Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Physics > Chemistry

November 21st, 2011, 09:52 GMT · By

Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos Do Not Exist

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


This is one of the detectors the OPERA experiment consists of
Enlarge picture
A few weeks ago, researchers at a lab in Italy took the physics world by storm, when they proposed the existence of neutrinos capable of traveling faster than the speed of light. Now, scientists from the same lab – but with a different experiment – show the results to be false.

The initial measurements were released by a team of experts with the Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus (OPERA) experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (GSNL).

Physicists here measured the speed at which neutrinos generated by the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) arrived at GSNL, and determined that elementary particles to travel the distance about 60 nanoseconds faster than photons.

If these results stand to scientific scrutiny, then this could mean that a huge portion of modern physics is wrong. Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity would also lose much of its shine, as the fact that light has the greatest speed in the Universe is one of its main tenets.

Now, researchers with the ICARUS (Imaging Cosmic and Rare Underground Signals) experiment – also at Gran Sasso – say that they were able to demonstrate an error in the OPERA results, which helps explain why their colleagues got the results they did.

Details of the new study are published online in the science journal arXiv. It holds that researchers at the GSNL should have observed a very significant deformation of the neutrino energy spectrum, if indeed these particles were traveling faster than light.

Additionally, the OPERA group should have also identified increased numbers of photons and e+e- pairs. Using data collected by ICARUS in 2010, also from the LHC neutrino beams, the second research team was able to demonstrate that no such variations were recorded.

Physicists with the ICARUS experiment also say that neutrino beams traveling faster than light should have lost some of their energy through the production of excess photons and e+e- pairs. This is not obvious in the data the detector collected.

In the group's analysis, the energy spectrum of the LHC neutrino beam is unaltered from expectations, proving that indeed no supraluminal (faster than light) events occurred. Scientists also show that the beams were not emitting coherent Cherenkov radiations.

The release of such radiations is expected to accompany any particle traveling at supraluminal speeds. In addition, the second team did not find any gamma-rays, which should have also been produced in such a scenario.

This is the second paper that proposes different interpretations for the OPERA results, after another research group indicated that small errors in the GPS satellites used to measure the distance between the GSNL and CERN may have been responsible for the readings.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,191 hits · 4 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Neutrinos May Travel Faster Than Light

Assessing the Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Theory

Explanation for Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos Proposed

Physicists Potentially Confirm CP Violation

Dark Matter May Be Cooling the Sun from Within

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: neil on 21 Nov 2011, 10:20 UTC reply to this comment

i think you mean that the speed of light is one of GTR's main "tenets"...rather than "tenant"...spell check fail :)

Comment #1.1 by: Tudor Vieru on 21 Nov 2011, 10:28 GMT

corrected, thanks!


Comment #2 by: anon on 21 Nov 2011, 14:12 UTC reply to this comment

Enjoyed the article but I have a qibble with this statement "as the fact that light has the greatest speed in the Universe is one of its main tenets. "

Actually, special relativity allows for some particles(taychons) to travel faster than the speed of light. They must always travel that fast, however, as the the theory doesn't allow crossing the light speed barrier.


Comment #3 by: Gwilym on 24 Nov 2011, 01:04 UTC reply to this comment

Iwould think that it is most probably an error of measurement bearing in mind the simultaneity referred to in the stellar burst measuerment over a a 1000 light year distance. I would think that a superluminal explanation is the least likely outcome. I would point out that the cern neutrinos are higher energy and are initiallyy of a single type of neutrino whereas the stellar burst would be a uniform source wrt the three neutrino types , and also the cern neutrinos are higher energy which might infer an effect wrt a fifth dimension and/or the mechanism of mutation of the neutrinos. It would be interesting to see if the result is reproduced, if it is a constant time difference or proporttional to the distance of travel. As the neutrino is termed a kaluza klein particle the fifth dimension in this theory may have some relevance and what if the cylindrical symmetry proposed by Kaluza was violated at higher energies? In short, as the monkey said when he did his business in the sugar bowl and covered it over " THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN "

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM