Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Security

May 13th, 2011, 08:54 GMT · By

Facebook Taps Web of Trust to Improve Its Malicious Link Detection Capability

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Facebook will use WOT data to flag malicious links
Enlarge picture
Facebook has partnered up with website reputation service Web of Trust (WOT) and will leverage its data to detect malicious URLs on the social network.

Facebook already has its own URL filtering system which has been in use for a long time, although a lot of abusive links continue to make their way onto people's walls.

The social networking website has become one of the primary hunting grounds for scammers, spammers and malware distributors and the company is trying to fight it.

Tapping into WOT's intelligence will allow Facebook to detect phishing, spam and other malicious URLs faster.

WOT is supported by a community of millions of users who have installed its toolbar and are rating websites based on several criteria. These ratings are coupled with data from other partners to determine the reputation of URLs.

When users will attempt to visit an URL flagged as malicious by WOT by clicking on a link posted on Facebook, they will be blocked and prompted with a warning dialog.

"The link you are trying to visit has been classified as potentially abusive by Facebook partners. [...] This warning is provided in collaboration with Web of Trust," the dialog reads.

Users will have the option to return to the previous page or ignore the warning and continue to the destination, which can be useful in case of false positives.

Facebook plans to set up partnerships with other parties that maintain similar malicious URL blacklists. Such data feeds are available from some antivirus vendors, but also from free services like Google Safe Browsing or Phishtank.

Of course users are also encouraged to use Facebook's own spam reporting features which are available for posts, pages and other messages. Excercising caution and common sense when dealing with links in the first place, goes a long way in protecting users from becoming victims.



1,926 hits · 6 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


All Facebook Apps to Support HTTPS by October

Facebook Begins Rolling Out Two-Factor Authentication

Facebook Deploys Anti-Likejacking Solution

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: blaclie22 on 13 May 2011, 16:38 UTC reply to this comment

I love wot but I do see a problem with this. I see people rating bad cause they are a competing business or just for the heck of it.WOT needs a way to double check some of the raters before they change a page's rating.


Comment #2 by: wonderWoman on 20 May 2011, 02:30 UTC reply to this comment

This is totally not cool This so called WEB OF TRUST is censoring my access to facebook postings by organizations that I know are trustworthy.

This is nothing more than an attack on freedom of thought since it is a blatant attack on religious freedom. Search facebook for WAY TO HAPPINESS and look for the religious tolerance commercial.

Either Facebook fires this so-called WEB OF TRUST or I'm off Facebook and if you value your freedom, you should be as well.

DON"T TRY TO CENSOR OUR THOUGHT!

Comment #2.1 by: Memmy on 28 Jun 2011, 19:21 GMT

"Users will have the option to return to the previous page or ignore the warning and continue to the destination, which can be useful in case of false positives."

On the right is the button that says, "Return to previous page", on the left is a link that says, "Ignore this warning".

If you wish to continue to use the internet I suggest you learn to read everything before you fly off the handle.

Comment #2.2 by: Tim on 12 Jan 2013, 22:41 GMT

What a terribly ignorant and poorly thought out response from memmy! I'm guessing he/she is a hired hand. You are right Wonder Woman. This s about as out of order as is possible.


Comment #3 by: David on 31 May 2011, 01:43 UTC reply to this comment

I see a big problem with this. This is an attack on freedom and businesses who fall victim to inaccurate data being held and potential customers are given the wrong information undermining reputations without any legal basis at all.


Comment #4 by: Splish on 13 Dec 2012, 00:13 UTC reply to this comment

Scary scary scary! Already had great link to academic article censored by this. Who the heck is choosing the criteria?

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM