Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

November 4th, 2009, 01:01 GMT · By

Experts Struggle to Find What Makes Us Self-Aware

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


A study of a man with extensive brain damage (bottom) suggests that changes in heartbeat are normally detected via the insula (green) as well as the sense of touch (blue)
Enlarge picture
For many years, neuroscientists believed that the “headquarters” of human self-awareness were located in a portion of the brain called the insula, which allows us to realize the things that go on inside the body. For just as many years, this explanation had sufficed, and experts moved onwards with their research, to other areas of the human brain. However, the recent case of a patient with severe damage to the insula and still able to be self-aware has thrown the old theory into disarray and brought it back to the attention of the international scientific community, ScienceNow reports.

The reason why the insula remained the favored explanation for so many years is the fact that it's responsible for integrating a number of pieces of information the cortex receives from the body. The most important ones include things such as realizing that you have a full stomach, becoming aware of changes in body temperature, as well as a host of other internal sensations. Knowing this, experts have hypothesized that the insula somehow transforms these stimuli into conscious sensations, but the exact mechanisms employed to do this have proven to be extremely difficult to test.

But a patient named “Roger” has brought the existing theory to its knees. He developed a disease known as the herpes simplex encephalitis as far back as the 1980s. The condition destroyed between 25 and 35 percent of his brain, including his insula. Yet, the patient is perfectly able to communicate, has excellent language skills and a normal IQ. The only differences between him and a “normal” person are that he has bouts of amnesia, as well as the fact that he misses the senses of smell and taste. University of Iowa researchers Sahib Khalsa and David Rudrauf have been curious to know how Roger interprets visceral sensations, so they have asked him to undergo a few tests.

When compared with 11 healthy subjects undergoing the same trials, the patient proves just as able to detect changes going on inside him as any other individual. However, in a test where a drug was given to the participants that increased their heart rates, Roger could not feel the increase in beats when his chest was rubbed with an anesthetic cream. This means that parallel pathways in the brain might be at work, and that one of them integrates the sense of touch. The find is detailed in this week's online issue of the respected journal Nature Neuroscience.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,748 hits · 4 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Experts Create Silicon-Silk Electronics

MicroRNA Can Suppress Metastasis

Muscle Interfaces to Connect Humans and Computers

The Molecule That Promotes Fast Decision-Making

Carbon Nanotubes Adversely Affect the Lungs

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Mike on 27 Dec 2009, 14:58 UTC reply to this comment

I was thinking about self awareness today. I thought that it must be part of the brain that handles this, but apparently according to this article, it does not. I still say that it must be a part of the brain that at least processes some sort of information of self-awareness, some sort of instruction set, but what is this instruction set? How do we find it? It's easy to find a peice of software code that performs a certain action, but when it comes to biology, we have not cracked the code that makes us function. We could look at brain waves, but from what I gather, if this is the code, how do we decipher it?

Aside from that, I don't think it's our senses that make us self-aware, one could be blind and still be self aware, your limbs could "fall alseep" and that still makes you self aware of your own existance. Even loosing all of our senses, we would still be aware of our existance. The only time that I believe that we are not self-aware is when we sleep. Even when we dream, we are still not aware that we are alive. Because of this, I come to think that somewhere in the brain, or some chemical which processes the biological code that tells us we are self aware, is only active during the waking period. So how do we find it? One test that may move us closer to understanding what makes us self-aware, would be to supress everything else until we get to the point where the subject isn't self aware - short of putting the subject in a sleeping state or coma. If we can do that and study the brain as more and more of the brains functions are shut down, we may find the answer.

What will we do with that answer though? Thinking about my own existance and what the point of our awareness would be, I came to no conclusion. I started thinking that it is a waste of bio-technology in the billions to have it all shut down (die). If we can find the source of the self-awareness code that has been implanted in all of us, and create some kinda of data interface, perhaps then we may have discovered the cure for death. I belive that it may be a single peice of code that is processessed by a particular region of the brain and it may be possible to interface with it and transfer that code to another host, whereby extending the life of that individual indefinatly. Though memories and learned behavior would be abset; but that is not a part of what makes us aware of our own existance.

Comment #1.1 by: Lewis on 25 Apr 2012, 13:44 GMT

I read your comment, found it fascinating.
I'm colletting data for a research on programs, AI, and self-awareness..you have lightened some trace that could be interesting to follow, so..thank you!


Comment #2 by: Liam on 04 May 2010, 23:59 UTC reply to this comment

I think that there is no main part in the brain that holds the key to self awareness. But each segment means you are self-aware of particular parts so, as in the case of "roger", Even if part of your brain is damaged, you can still be partly self-aware.


Comment #3 by: broca on 28 Nov 2010, 05:47 UTC reply to this comment

neurosurgeons have cracked skulls open like eggs and searched in every single nook and cranny for the mind, the self, and they can't find it. we are machines, sadly.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM