Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Security

January 18th, 2012, 12:58 GMT · By

Expert: Bank Transactions Can Be Manipulated Even If OTP Devices Are Used

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Screenshot from the POC video
Enlarge picture
Security experts show that a virus can take full control over an Internet Explorer browser and manipulate bank transactions in real-time even if the bank’s customer that’s about to perform the task relies on an OTP (one time password) device.

Yash K.S., chief technology officer at Red Force Labs, released a proof of concept video to show how a cleverly designed virus can be used in a Man-in-the-Browser (MitB) attack that targets HSBC Bank transactions.

The point of the video is not to encourage illegal activities, so no code or details of the virus are released, instead the aim is to raise awareness on the security issues that affect online banking systems, even if sophisticated anti-fraud mechanisms are utilized.

“We believe, that unless you know how to ethically hack, you cannot defend yourself completely from malicious attacks,” reads the video’s disclaimer.

In the clip, the expert shows how an unsuspecting user logs in to his HSBC online banking account using an account password and a one-time password provided by the OTP device.

While the user enters the details of the destination account and the amount of money he wishes to transfer, the cybercriminal that controls the virus works in the background and alters the transaction’s details to his own liking.

The victim confirms the transaction, again with the OTP device, and completes it, but when he checks to see if the money arrived to its destination, he finds that not only the amount transferred is considerably higher, but also that the destination is a Citibank account, other than the one he chose.

In his demonstration Yash utilized a Windows 7 operating system, an Internet Explorer browser and an up-to-date Kaspersky anti-virus.


FILED UNDER:
POC
bank
MITB
virus


3,749 hits · 8 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


$6.7 Million (€4.6 Million) Stolen from Postbank by Hackers

FBI Wants Money to Erase People from Most Wanted List, Scam Email

ANZ Bank Phishing Campaign Powered by Google Docs

Zappos.Com Hacked, 24 Million Users Exposed

Israeli Hacker Exposes Details of 5,000 Credit Cards

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Aditya on 19 Jan 2012, 03:33 UTC reply to this comment

Its time banks make effort to make online banking secure for its users.


Comment #2 by: MattPW on 20 Jan 2012, 03:14 UTC reply to this comment

OTP is and has been vulnerble for a long time. Zeus malware has had MITB modules for many years. The way to stop this is to use passive transaction authentication like the passwindow method provides where actual transaction information is encoded along with an OTP directly from the server to the user regardless of what the malware inbetween does. With just an OTP request the user has no idea what they are authenticating.

Comment #2.1 by: Dana on 08 Feb 2012, 17:20 GMT

Check out SafeNet's new transaction signing token at: http://news.softpedia.com/news/SafeNet-Releases-Optical-Signing-Device-to-Prevent-eBanking-Fraud-247247.shtml

Its meant to fight exactly this kind of financial fraud which happens even when the customer has been authenticated with otp.

Comment #2.2 by: pres on 15 Feb 2012, 14:31 GMT

SafeNet's signing token doesn't work for these types of attacks

Comment #2.3 by: present on 15 Feb 2012, 14:52 GMT

SafeNet's signing token doesn't work.......!

Comment #2.4 by: infosec-anon on 22 Mar 2012, 18:27 GMT

Actually the SafeNet Optical Token does work because it sends the end user a message telling them what they are saying yes to versus just saying yes to authorizing the removal/transfer of funds. You could still compromise the initial stages of the SafeNet Token (i.e. the malware is still logging in behind the scenes to the account), but once the transaction is presented and scrolls across the token, if the user reads the information on the token versus the screen, they will see they are getting swindled. I saw a demonstration of this token and it is amazing. There is an over $15 million deal with a bank right now that they independently validated this defeats the hack.


Comment #3 by: vinay on 20 Jan 2012, 06:45 UTC reply to this comment

Good work by Yash....Vinay


Comment #4 by: zerog on 05 Dec 2012, 03:39 UTC reply to this comment

Use google chrome

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM