NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Space

Space


Energy Alternatives for Mars Colonies

Experts assess what the best energy source would be

By Dan Talpalariu, Science Editor

13th of November 2008, 16:27 GMT

Adjust text size:


Mars' most likely energy forms will be solar and nuclear
Enlarge picture
With all the events going on, including Phoenix Mars Lander's recent demise and the discoveries provided by the two twin rovers, Opportunity and Spirit, as well as the uncertainty raised by the space shuttle retirement process and its replacement system, scientists still find the time to think about the future of Mars missions. More specifically – human colonization and the ability to sustain it energy-wise. A team of MIT specialists are focusing on this matter on NASA's behalf.

 

Among the discussed alternatives, which were eventually narrowed down to 13, were, of course, solar arrays (either fixed or tracking the Sun), nuclear (fission) power reactors, or radioisotope thermal generators (RTGs), which produce heat by means of a decaying piece of radioisotope and use the heat to create electricity. But the overall winners were nuclear power generators (for providing power in constant supplies) and solar thin films (if placed adequately), in spite of the distance between the planet and the Sun.

 

While nuclear generators may sound appealing (especially considering that they are used in fueling Cassini, Galileo and New Horizons probes), not everyone seems to think the same. The potential scenario of something going wrong could have catastrophic results and lead to important health issues due to the released radioactivity. Also, the equipment and the material needed in order to install an operating small-scale nuclear power plant are considered to be beyond the capabilities of modern probes.

 

On the other hand, the solar panels would have to be placed in the northern hemisphere (at a latitude between 0 and 40° north of the equator) and in such a way that they avoid the negative impact of the dust storms. But they are easier to carry and install on the Martian surface (it would take 2 trained people about 17 hours). And, as planetary scientist Colin Pillinger from the Open University in the UK explains, quoted by NewScientist, "Dust storms tend to start in well-known places in the southern hemisphere as it warms up, so it shouldn't be too difficult to avoid them."

TAGS:

Mars | energy | solar | nuclear | colonization
Read by 963 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
NOT RATED 0 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


First Moon, then Mars, Says NASA

NASA's Next Mission on Mars Will Be MAVEN

Phoenix Is Now Flat-Lined

Simulation for Mars Mission Begins in March

Opportunity and Spirit Roam on Mars Again

Spring on Mars Triggers Avalanche Season

Methane Sources on Mars

Magnetic Shields for Mars Trips Would Protect Spaceships

NASA's Orion Capsule Is Like Apollo, Only Bigger

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM