Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Health

December 4th, 2010, 11:15 GMT · By

Electronic Cigarettes Proven Dangerous

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


E-cigarette fluid leaking out of a cartridge, making it difficult to handle without touching the nicotine solution
Enlarge picture
E-cigarettes, officially called 'electronic nicotine delivery systems,' are more and more popular among smokers who want to reduce the risks of smoking-related cancers but will not give up their favorite vice – nicotine.

They are available worldwide and in the US, you can find them in shopping malls in most states, and, of course, on the Internet.

But in order to see just how 'safe' they are, a group of scientists at the University of California, Riverside tested five e-cigarette brands and found a lot of issues, enough to conclude that e-cigarettes are potentially harmful.

After their analysis, they urge regulators to consider removing the products from the market until their safety is adequately evaluated.

Prue Talbot, the director of UC Riverside's Stem Cell Center, whose lab led the research, and also a professor of cell biology and neuroscience, conducted the study along with Anna Trtchounian, the first author of the research paper.

They looked at the design, the accuracy and clarity of labeling, nicotine content, defective parts, disposal, leakiness, errors in filling orders, instruction manual quality and advertizing, for NJOY, Liberty Stix, Crown Seven (Hydro), Smoking Everywhere (Gold and Platinum) and VapCigs.

They have made several observations that include the lack of important information concerning e-cigarette content, use and essential warnings, on batteries, atomizers, cartridges, cartridge wrappers, packs and instruction manuals.

Some e-cigarette cartridges leak, and that could expose nicotine, an addictive and dangerous chemical, to children, adults, pets and the environment.

For now, there are no methods for proper disposal of e-cigarettes products and accessories, including cartridges, which could result in nicotine contamination from discarded cartridges entering water sources and soil, and adversely impacting the environment.

And last but not least, the manufacture, quality control, sales, and advertisement of e-cigarettes are unregulated.

The principle behind the e-cigarette is that instead of burning tobacco, it vaporizes nicotine along with other compounds, in the form of aerosol resulting from heating.

Although it is said to be safe because it does not contain the thousands of chemicals and toxicants emanating from tobacco combustion, nothing is actually known about the chemicals within the aerosolized vapors of e-cigarettes.

Talbot said that “as a result, some people believe that e-cigarettes are a safe substitute for conventional cigarettes.

“However, there are virtually no scientific studies on e-cigarettes and their safety.

“Our study – one of the first studies to evaluate e-cigarettes – shows that this product has many flaws, which could cause serious public health problems in the future if the flaws go uncorrected.”

Kamlesh Asotra, a research administrator at University of California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (UC TRDRP), said that “more research on e-cigarettes is crucially needed to protect the health of e-cigarette users and even those who do not use e-cigarettes.

“Contrary to the claims of the manufacturers and marketers of e-cigarettes being 'safe,' in fact, virtually nothing is known about the toxicity of the vapors generated by these e-cigarettes.

“Until we know any thing about the potential health risks of the toxins generated upon heating the nicotine-containing content of the e-cigarette cartridges, the 'safety' claims of the manufacturers are dubious at best.

“Justifiably, more information about the potential toxic and health effects of e-cigarette vapors is necessary before the public can have a definitive answer about the touted safety of e-cigarettes.

“Hopefully, in the near future, scientists can provide firm evidence for or against the claimed 'safety' of e-cigarettes as a nicotine-delivery tool.”

The study was funded by a grant to Talbot from TRDRP, and the results appear in this month's issue of Tobacco Control.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

3,268 hits · 8 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Harder to Quit Smoking for Anxious People

Smoking Shuts Down Tumor-Suppressing Genes

Smokers Risk Having a Thinner Brain

Innovative Smoking-Prevention Program at Work

Passive Smoking Rises Hearing Loss Risks

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: starranger on 06 Dec 2010, 15:28 UTC reply to this comment

If you view these devices in the context that everyone who uses them is probably a smoker who would burn their tobacco if not afforded the means to partake of their nicotine in this form, then the "dangers" are probably overstated and sound like some nitpickers who have nothing better to do.


Comment #2 by: Eric on 07 Dec 2010, 20:16 UTC reply to this comment

I tend to agree. Vaporized product is generally much safer than combustion, no matter what. However, I don't view this as "nitpicking". E-cigarette companies cannot wildly claim these devices are safe if there is no science to support that. Hasn't society already been through this once, where tobacco companies lied about their product being dangerous and addictive? Don't we know better?

At the very least, a real study on these products is needed. My guess is they will be proven to be much healthier than normal cigarettes because vaporization is much cleaner, but we shouldn't allow these companies to sell whatever they want with little regulation without having the science to know for sure how dangerous these products are.


Comment #3 by: JB on 07 Dec 2010, 21:52 UTC reply to this comment

Why was a biochemist studying the engineering, packaging and marketing characteristics of the devices instead of the actual nicotine liquids and how they react. If all they could find were design, packaging and instructional issues shouldn't the thrust of this article be different? It seems like a lot of conclusions are being reached by this "study" just because there is a Ph.D or M.D. behind their name. Would you take your car to an M.D. to evaluate it? The M.D. should evaluate things that pertinant to his field, leave the engineering to the engineers and the writing of documentation to the tech writers.


Comment #4 by: jackyboy on 18 Feb 2011, 05:11 UTC reply to this comment

dosen't really sound like anything was "proven" in this article.


Comment #5 by: BenZen on 11 Mar 2011, 10:51 UTC reply to this comment

Between the cigarette and the ecigarette?

For me, anything but the tobacco!

It's not rocket science to think about!


Comment #6 by: LondonWater on 17 Jun 2011, 20:41 UTC reply to this comment

We should be able to drink mercury if we want to. To each his own, I don't need regulation and studies just to allow me to do something. Less rules, less stress. I'm not saying a study wouldn't be good but I can make my own choices without the governments ok. I'm sucking on an ecig right now and I think some of the juice has leaked on my tongue but I have google and I know that 60 mg would kill me which is a very tiny amount. I also know that my device might not be all that safe and it could leak. Smoking 2 packs a day is also unsafe. We are all gonna die someday, I just think we should get to decide what to put in our own bodies. So many people in jail just for putting something in their bodies, its not right. If the government wants to control unsafe things then they should put alcohol and tobacco on that list as well as hotdogs, crisco and yelling at each other. Its just crap, all of it. We are humans with only one life to live each and what we do as individuals to pass the time or entertain is a choice that should be left to the individual so long as he/she is not harming others lives. It makes me very sad and depressed that the choices my parents had when they were kids have been taken away from us and even though most of us agree that we are less free than ten years ago, our choice only lies in what governor or President we elect and not in the actual decision.


Comment #7 by: adicted on 09 Dec 2011, 10:35 UTC reply to this comment

What total BS. The cartrige could be harmful to the environment due to it having traces of nicotine. What to do think millions and millions of traditional buts have in them? Where have they been disposed of for the past 150 years plus? Who wrote this article?

No don't use e-cigs if you don't smoke. Nicotine is harmful!!! Yes we all know that.

If you do smoke and cannot go cold turkey, try them. It could be the one product that makes the difference, between you becoming a non smoker or remaining a hopllessly adicted traditional smoker like me . It has worked for me where NOTHING else has. They are not healthy but a much better alternative when you are trying to quit.


Comment #8 by: bradman on 24 Mar 2012, 05:24 UTC reply to this comment

they shouldn't ban them. compare it to an actual cig. the e cig clearly is much safer. the government is only trying to eliminate people switching to the e cig because they wont make as much money from the huge taxes they impose on real cigs. they will find a way to put the same tax on e cigs and claim its not the tobacco but the harmless nicotine they are taxing. bull #@!t is what I say about the government wanting to eliminate our rights.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM