Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

GAMES

Electronic Arts, Not the White Knight

- Analysts consider Rockstar independence

By: Andrei Dumitrescu, Games Editor

EA Chief Executive John Riccitiello, the man who wants to start a revolution at Electronic Arts, has recently made a very interesting comment regarding the offer of his company
to take over Take Two and, implicitly, game developer Rockstar. The New York Times has him on record as saying "We, in many ways, represent a white knight [to Rockstar]".

So this is how it is: Rockstar is the pure maiden in distress, running around while stepping on its own dress, who is hunted down by the dark husband that is Take Two, while the handsome knight called Electronic Arts is trying to overthrow the husband and then re-marry the damsel. Does something feel weird in the above description? Several analysts seem to think that Rockstar is not a pushover and certainly doesn't need EA to be a better game studio.

Three games industry analysts have offered opinion on Riccitiello's comments, while talking to GameDaily, and they all disagree with him. Mike Hickey of Janco Partners was pretty frank with his statement. He said: "My belief is Rockstar would be perfectly happy if EA never put a bid in at all. White knight commentary is total bulls**t, and disrespectful to both the developers at TTWO and the new management team that has already achieved success."

David Col, from DFC Intelligence, thinks Rockstar have no real distribution problems, this being the only segment where EA could help. To him, it is all about whether "EA is a white knight for Take-Two shareholders by offering to pay them the maximum value they feel they can get" and Rockstar is not in any way involved in shareholder matters.

Michael Pachter, a renowned game industry watcher, is more blunt and says that EA "are in no sense a White Knight". But he underscores the fact that the GTA intellectual property is actually not Rockstar's, but rather Take Two's, so the hostile takeover Electronic Arts is attempting might very well be aimed at seizing that IP rather than Rockstar itself.

MORE RELATED ARTICLES: Max Payne Movie Still On GTA MMO a Real Possibility Rockstar Apologizes to Gamers Bully Launches, Controversy Revives GTA IV Gets Big, Huge, Impressive... Wanted No BioShock Without GTA The Sims Castway Stories Released for Mac Rock Band Comes to Europe With New Songs New Tricks at EA Sports
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


19th March 2008, 11:45 GMT | Copyright (c) 2008 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 536 user(s) | Rating: | 5 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Electronic Arts, Not the White Knight - USER OPINIONS




We are sorry, there are no opinions available for this article.






SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Electronic Arts, Not the White Knight

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive