Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Green > Research & Tech

November 7th, 2011, 07:42 GMT · By Oana Grigoras

EPA Tries to Control the Coal Ash Which Threatens to Bury America

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The headquarters of the United States Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C
Enlarge picture
Nowadays, the US coal industry burns approximately 900 million metric tons of coal every year. This entire process in responsible for spreading billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, substantially decreasing the air quality.

Since the carbon footprint reaches alarming rates, the governments scale up their efforts to replace the coal-based power with greener sources of energy.

According to experts in this field of activity, another negative effect of the coal usage is the significant amount of coal ash which is left behind. The construction industry managed to apply the benefits of this residual compound by integrating it in the manufacturing process of its final products, like cement, concrete.

Coal ash can also be spotted in farmers' fields and in old coal mines, but the experts warn that the product's usage isn't always beneficial. In most of the cases, it ends in dumps near coal power plants and it seems that landfills can't always store the entire amount.

The most relevant example seems to be the coal ash collapse which affected Lake Michigan earlier this week, or the unfortunate incident that took place in December 2008, affecting the natural balance of Emory and Clinch rivers, located in Tennessee.

As governments are struggling to provide an effective legal framework which could regulate the present situation, major companies that operate on the coal market are trying to fight against such projects.

Their efforts are comprehensible, taking into consideration that a potential labeling of coal ash as “hazardous” would increase the costs of disposal operations.

Officials from EPA determined that coal combustion wastes (CCWs) from landfills and surface impoundments should be regulated "under Subtitle D of RCRA (the solid waste regulations), whereas CCW used to fill surface or underground mines (minefill) should be regulated under authority of Subtitle D of RCRA, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), or a combination of these authorities."

As we speak, EPA is studying the products left behind by the coal industry, while trying to find out which coal ash piles are really a threat to the environment and to the wellbeing of local communities.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

512 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Power Plants Might Turn Hybrid to Decrease Costs

The Shipping Industry Could Re-evaluate the Benefits of Wind Power

9 out of 10 Americans Support the Solar Industry's Development

Coal-Burning Processes Remain a Dirty, Profitable Business

Desertec Will Supply the European Market with Clean Energy from African Solar Plant

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: J Bird on 08 Nov 2011, 02:23 UTC reply to this comment

When you fight coal you fight Jobs and Support Higher Electric Bills. I Fill Sorry for you

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM