NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Games

Games


ELSPA and BBFC Are Not Friends

It's still unclear who should rate games in the UK

By Calin Ciabai, Games Editor

8th of July 2008, 17:06 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
The Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA) supports the Pan European Games Ratings Information (PEGI) rating systems and not the homebrew British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), as some might think should be the case. Thus, since two companies with different opinions on how things should be done and lots of money involved, the BBFC and ELSPA keep fighting against one another.

Using doctor Tanya Byron's review as a cover, the ELSPA keeps asking the UK government to
adopt the PEGI rating system since only they "fully assess all games content," being specifically designed for interactive content (as its name suggests, the BBFC's main domain are movies). Also, the association believes that having a unique rating system across all Europe would be the best thing to do, since it would make things clear for everybody.

"People are not stupid and shouldn't be treated as such. When they see an 18 roundel on a box, they know what it means, regardless of the current classifier. Nevertheless, it is essential that the public has confidence in any ratings administrator," said Paul Jackson, Director General, ELSPA.

The idea of using the PEGI rating system is supported by most of the big game developers and publishers, such as Nintendo, Ubisoft, Sega or Electronic Arts. And this is just one of the reasons the BBFC wants to grab a piece of the pie, too.

"The trouble is that it is not clear who PEGI is," BBFC boss David Cooke told The Times. "Administration is handled by the Dutch film regulator, who subcontracts to a couple of blokes [the Video Standards Council] in Borehamwood."

He continues to say that the board is ready to review 300 to 500 games per year with its 12 specialized testers and that there will be no delays (it usually takes eight days for a game to be reviewed by the board). David Cooke added that reports regarding a possible increase in the rating costs are rubbish - now, you have to pay £1600 ($3200) to rate a game but the price can only go down as the testers gain more experience and start working faster.

So... it's a game ratings war out there. Any idea who's going to win?

TAGS:

ELSPA | BBFC | rating system | UK | PEGI
Read by 624 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
NOT RATED 0 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


You Can Beta Test Stone Age 2 Now

This Is Vegas Delayed

Every Extend Extra Extreme Achievements and Cheats (Xbox 360)

PS3 Consumes Five Times More Power than a Fridge

Blazing Angels 2: Secret Missions Of WWII Cheats and Achievements (Xbox 360)

Rick Nash, Cover Athlete for NHL 2K9

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM