Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Web resources

April 12th, 2010, 15:06 GMT · By Catalin Cimpanu

Dribbble, the Web-Design Community Hall of Fame

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Dribble launches as a closed web-design community website
Enlarge picture
The design community has seen a huge expansion in recent years with thousands of blogs or community sites trying to copy or imitate the success of more successful ventures like CSS Globe, Smashing Magazine, Wired, MIX Online, Tuts+, Designer Depot or Noupe.

Recent blog posts and articles show a trend in the web-design community, started by more veteran artists, to isolate itself from all the copy-cats, kiddie designers and Photoshop noobs that have flooded the market recently.

All of this commenced at the beginning of the 2000s, when designers started getting together and sharing knowledge on sites either built by themselves or hosted by more famous design magazines (print or web issues).

While the artists expanded their sites with easy-to-learn tutorials and easy-to-find information organized in listicles (list articles), the success itself almost killed the entire community. Every person with Internet access and an image-processing software like Adobe Photoshop, PaintShop Pro or Paint .Net had aspirations of entering the design market.

In the meanwhile, really talented artists and veteran illustrators saw their fees take a plunge thanks to the huge number of freelancers and cheaper designers. This surely but slowly led to a rift being created between the real-design community and the recent newcomers.

Sites like Drawar and Smashing Magazine are places with the biggest databases in web artistry and articles, but more and more articles are taking shots at the talent-less newcomers.

At the end of 2009, Dribbble launched, entering its public beta period. The website accepted members by invitation only. That meant that old design veterans or world-famous and established artists have gathered together and are almost screaming, “The real stuff is right here” in an attempt to isolate themselves from all the cheap and untalented part of the community.

At the end of March 2010, the website officially left beta and entered the design community to rave reviews and lots of attention. To enter its user base, a well-established designer has to invite you, and by doing so, they are fully responsible for your actions.

After joining it, Dribbble works as a graphic Twitter. Members (web-designers, code developers, logo artists, illustrators, cartoon artists, etc.) can publish a small image of 400 by 300 pixels as a short preview of their current work. Their motto, “Show and tell for designers in 120,000 pixels or less” is very similar to Twitter's motto, “Broadcast yourself in 140 characters or less.”

For now, Dribbble has reputation on its side, entertaining famous artists like Doug Bowman (currently Twitter, former Google design mastermind), Trent Walton, Dan Cederholm (Electronic Arts, Google, MTV, ESPN, Inc.com), Jeffrey Zeldman, Elliot Jay Stocks (EMI Records, Virgin, .NET Magazine) and Simon Collison.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

3,681 hits · 10 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Mozilla Picks Its Favorites in the Home Tab for Firefox 4 Design Challenge

Adobe Launches Creative Suite 5

20 Years of Adobe Photoshop

Top Web Trends for 2010 - Part II - Web Design Trends

Top Web Trends for 2010 - Part III - Programming Trends

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: dcmjs on 28 Apr 2010, 14:49 UTC reply to this comment

You obviously have never read Drawar at all. Please do your research before claiming something like that.

Comment #1.1 by: Catalin Cimpanu on 10 May 2010, 14:24 GMT

@dcmjs and @Dani Kelley
Please consult this link: http://web.archive.org/web/20080517125451/http://drawar.com/ As you can see Drawar hosted list articles.

I have been a reader of Drawar since it's birth in 2008. Drawar did feature list articles, but does not do it now, opting for a new vision on design and graphics websites.

I have mentioned Drawar for its impact it had in the past, being an important place for inspiration and news.

My mistake was to mention only Smashing Magazine and Drawar in that paragraph, and not mention a lot more sites that applied that strategy. So I might understand that someone might think that only SM and Drawar are the only ones that do it (did it).

People regard list articles as bad because of recent critical articles. Per example "Smashing Magazine Killed The Community (Or Maybe It Was Me)" on Drawar, and much many more.

Personally I've always liked listicles. I was ONLY REPORTING on what is going on and on what people have been saying on sites like SM and Drawar. If designers are jumping at each others throats for ultra-populating the web with listicles that's your problem and should not be offended if this is the way people are perceiving the recent forum talks or articles. This trend is not present only on Drawar but on many other design blogs out there. Your community is at a crisis and the way you handle it is your own business.

Comment #1.2 by: dcmjs on 19 May 2010, 22:55 GMT

Please don't misunderstand my intentions. I too am fond of listicles. While they still afford the opportunity for untrained designers to pass off someone else's creativity and skill as they're own, those rare cases are eclipsed by the usefulness of a listicle in the hands of a skilled web design practitioner.

My qualms with the mentioning of Drawar in this article was that the site is depicted as a current propagator of list articles. I understand that Drawar may have hosted list articles in the past, but he does not now, nor did he at the time of this article's publishing.

It's equivalent to reporting that Senator Arlen Specter is an active member of the Republican party. Though Senator Specter was at one time a republican, he currently is not. In fact, the switch in his affiliation is worth as much (if not more) of a story than his republican career, debatably even MORE so if he was an influential member of his former party. So to speak of active republican activity and mention Senator Specter is incorrect and bad journalism without mentioning his defection.

The analogy applies: If you choose to discus list articles and mention a website that was once a propagator of them (by using "are" instead of "were"), you mislead the reader into thinking the site is still a list article site, which, in the case of Drawar, it's not. Also, depicting Drawar as a list site is in direct opposition to Drawar's target audience and presumably also hurts its number of page views.


Comment #2 by: badjedi on 28 Apr 2010, 16:40 UTC reply to this comment

Smashing Magazine and Drawar should not be the scapegoats to an ever changing community of web and graphic designers.I am a recent graduate in web design and I'm not in the least bit coveting a invitation to dribble why it's closed. If that community wants quality designers then maybe more openess and teaching should be done.Not some ole boy club where people are going around begging for invites. In my opinion it's just adding to the meltdown.


Comment #3 by: Dani Kelley on 28 Apr 2010, 18:56 UTC reply to this comment

My hope is that most people go to Drawar's site from your article and realize that he's never written a "listicle" - rather, he's quite passionate about listicles being a not-so-great thing. Curious why it's stated otherwise?

Comment #3.1 by: M. Pollard on 11 May 2010, 05:19 GMT

When listicles were hot, Drawar had a lot of them.
When listicles are bad, Drawar completely removed them.
When CSS galleries were cool, he added one to his site.
When it's cool to criticize new artists and rip on the design community's choices, Drawar is at its forefront.
The guy at Drawar has always sold out on his own vision only following the revenue stream. He has no back bone, only a wallet.
Don't tell me is not so. I learned to create fonts from his listicles, and now, after 3 years of activity, Drawar has only 46 articles hosted on its site. That's because he's ashamed of his lsiticles and deleted them. You can't be criticizing listicles if you're hosting them. He deleted them a while back and now he acts like he's never done it.
And I'm sure that whenever CSS galleries will be bad, he will delete his own gallery section.
SELL OUT!


Comment #4 by: indu havru on 16 May 2010, 08:28 UTC reply to this comment

Why does Drawar show now that they started in oct 2009?
What are they trying to hide?
Are they really that ashamed they shown listicles in the past? :))
Drawar = Scam
Smashing Magazine, CSS Globe = no 1


Comment #5 by: Scrivs on 20 May 2010, 04:27 UTC reply to this comment

I'm writing this just in case people in the future come across this article and don't understand the history of Drawar. When Drawar was started I was running 9rules. Drawar was created as a Digg for designers so whatever was posted there was by the community. I wasn't greatly involved in the design community then.

We sold 9rules and shut down all the other sites including Drawar. These sites were shutdown for over a year. Last year I decided I wanted to start a design site and still owned drawar.com and went with that. I knew the direction I wanted to go in and I have been going strong ever since. I say things that not everyone agrees with, I can deal with that. People won't like me because I say what is on my mind with regards to the design community, but I'm not immune to taking shots myself. Many are deserved, others are just people with anger.

The problem with this article is that 1) the way its worded makes it seem like Drawar is part of the lists fad and 2) if you really are talking about the OLD Drawar then you are misleading others.

However, if people want to blame Drawar for things then I will shoulder the blame and carry whatever torch people are running away from. I'll be the scapegoat.

Comment #5.1 by: Tootsie on 10 Aug 2010, 17:54 GMT

Drawar is good but Design Informer is Great! Drawar always put people down, to put him in the pedestal, at others expense.....he is not good for the community


Comment #6 by: Camute Pogoker on 05 Jun 2010, 13:27 UTC reply to this comment

Well drawar is a good site. It had list articles so i don't see why poeple make such a big deal from this anyway.
For a while it did criticize on its forum and articles the design community, but due to some harsh words against it, it backed down.
@Scrivs: there's no blame. you did a bad thing allowing criticism on your website against design new-comers (like me) and it back-fired when we didn't read that site anymore. drawar presents good discussion threads nevertheless, but the mass of your readers are people trying to learn about design. when old designers started regreting sharing their knowledge and calling the present design a fad, we the noobs started hating on them and eventually on drawar
as cssglobe and envato showed: love the noobs and they'll love you back, because we are 95% of all traffic

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM