Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nano-Biotechnology

July 31st, 2007, 17:56 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

Does Time Really Exist?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Dali Time
Enlarge picture
The more advanced the science, the more difficult puzzles emerge. Now, the shortest time intervals ever have been observed.

Ferenc Krausz in his lab at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany, has managed to do this by using ultraviolet laser pulses to detect the absurdly brief quantum leaps of electrons within atoms, an event lasting roughly 100 attoseconds (100 quintillionths of a second). Like a second in 300 million years.

But even so, on the Planck scale, attoseconds would be like eons. The scale would define a region where distances and intervals are so short that the concepts of time and space start to disappear.

Planck time, the smallest time unit with any physical meaning, would be 10-43 from a second, less than a trillionth of a trillionth of an attosecond. And furthermore? Tempus incognito at the limits of the current physics. But this run touches the very basics of the problem: time may not exist in physical reality. Then, what is time and why are we its slaves?

"The meaning of time has become terribly problematic in contemporary physics. The situation is so uncomfortable that by far the best thing to do is declare oneself an agnostic." said Simon Saunders, a philosopher of physics at the University of Oxford.
One hundred years ago, Einstein's theories of relativity eliminated the concept of time as a universal constant. The past, present and future would not be absolute. But these theories, aiming for gravity and the large-scale structure of the cosmos, do not match quantum physics, the realm of the tiny.

40 ago, John Wheeler, at Princeton and Bryce DeWitt, at the University of North Carolina, tried to combine them through an equation that turned the concept of time into a more confusing one.

"One finds that time just disappears from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation. It is an issue that many theorists have puzzled about. It may be that the best way to think about quantum reality is to give up the notion of time-that the fundamental description of the universe must be timeless," said Carlo Rovelli, a physicist at the
University of the Mediterranean in Marseille, France.

Many physicists believe that Wheeler-DeWitt equation rather describes a timeless universe. Another strange law of physics is that time always points to the future. All the physics laws could be applied as well if time ran backward. But for the moment, time is a one-way process; it never goes in reverse, even if no laws impede it.

"The usual explanation of this is that in order to specify what happens to a system, you not only have to specify the physical laws, but you have to specify some initial or final condition." said Seth Lloyd, a quantum mechanical engineer at MIT.

"The mother of all initial conditions was the Big Bang. Physicists believe that the universe started as a very simple, extremely compact ball of energy. Although the laws of physics themselves don't provide for an arrow of time, the ongoing expansion of the universe does. As the universe expands, it becomes ever more complex and disorderly. The growing disorder-physicists call it an increase in entropy-is driven by the expansion of the universe, which may be the origin of what we think of as the ceaseless forward march of time." said Loyd.

But as Einstein showed, time is a component of the universe. Our clocks don't measure something independent of the universe.

"In fact, clocks don't really measure time at all. I recently went to the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder. (NIST is the government lab that houses the atomic clock that standardizes time for the nation.) I said something like, 'Your clocks measure time very accurately.' They told me, 'Our clocks do not measure time.' I thought, Wow, that's very humble of these guys. But they said, 'No, time is defined to be what our clocks measure.' Which is true. They define the time standards for the globe: Time is defined by the number of clicks of their clocks." said Loyd.

"We say we measure time with clocks, but we see only the hands of the clocks, not time itself. And the hands of a clock are a physical variable like any other. So in a sense we cheat because what we really observe are physical variables as a function of other physical variables, but we represent that as if everything is evolving in time," said Rovelli.

"Is time a fundamental property of reality or just the macroscopic appearance of things? I would say it's only a macroscopic effect. It's something that emerges only for big things."

"Big things" would be anything above the mysterious Planck scale.

Even if physicists ever make it to join quantum theory and general relativity, space and time will be assessed by some changed quantum mechanics, in which space and time would be clearly separated and no longer smooth and continuous.
They would be made of tiny building blocks, quanta, just like light is made of photons, individual bundles of energy.
"In quantum mechanics all particles of matter and energy can also be described as waves." said Rovelli.

A peculiar trait of the waves is that they can exist in an infinite number in the same location. Quanta could be piled together in just one dimensionless point.

"Space and time in some sense melt in this picture. There is no space anymore. There are just quanta kind of living on top of one another without being immersed in a space," said Rovelli.
FILED UNDER:
time
quantum
realtivity

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

7,390 hits · 9 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Elephant-Mammoth Evolution Explains Human Evolution

Dinosaurs Took Control Smoothly

Why Do People Enjoy Watching Horror Movies?

How Can You Lose Weight While Having a Sedentary Job?

How to Avoid Back Pains

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Justin Rockwell on 08 May 2008, 13:27 UTC reply to this comment

I think the big bang did occur but god must of created that gigantic explosion or nothing would exist not even time!

Comment #1.1 by: P. F. Dassonville on 29 Dec 2010, 18:01 GMT

Archeology demonstrates that God was invented by men...


Comment #2 by: john derrack on 13 Aug 2008, 15:49 UTC reply to this comment

about Does Time really exist?

whats happen? I do care about this issue from 15 years ago, I did researches, I read almost written about this issue, from 2 years ago there were a few number of sites, part of it about Quantum, relativity,!!! the others ,,,!!! nowadays there r a huge number of sites, Whats happen within last two years? do you think people suddenly became smart !!!? where they were from 2 years ago? I think something did happen ? its HUGE NUMBER of site discuss this matter, I did search the Internet from less than 2 year ago, there were no more real 10 cites!!!!!!!!!


Comment #3 by: alfred Herman Schrader on 27 Sep 2009, 12:08 UTC reply to this comment

The source of time is the particle I discovered, the Graviton.
Gravitons orbit all atoms and create gravity and inertia by bumping into things. They have tiny, to huge orbits and travel at ridiculous speeds.
They are a "constant" controlling the orbits of planets, timing of a pendulum, etc...Alfred Herman Schrader


Comment #4 by: boris prashant on 20 Nov 2009, 12:30 UTC reply to this comment

proving existence of time will be a paradox.

the basic unit of defining one second of time:
the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.
as is in use today,the definition itself provides a brief,but valuable insight into the nature of time.it's a measure,developed to study the processes (known,unknown,being discovered).
time in itself cannot exist.it will exist only along with the perceived changes and processes going along.
and since it is not possible to remove even a single atom from the boundaries of the known and imagined universe,application of relativity will prove useless,simply because the basic function of relativity depends on the fact that we take two processes separately,which is impossible.as even two hypothetical separate processes boundaries will exist in the same plane which proposes to divide them.and if this division is not achieved,then time itself will turn into hypothesis or simply a measuring tool for understanding,not a self exiting entity or a noun.
taking the whole universe and n number of factors affecting it,hasn't been achieved as yet.but even if it is supposed,then too proving is arduous.
eg.
at t=0 an egg appears
at t=1 a chick hatches
at t=2 it dies
simply put,
all three things are evolutionary and not time dependent.but we can undersatnd it by putting milestones for stages,and not the other way round,that definitely a chick will hatch at t=1.
hence it is a supplementary measure to understand not self -existent.

even if two separate processes move along at same beginning point,we can only state that a process is reaching its end point faster than the other,using time measure,but not the other way round that time measure will be long or short because of it.
also during comparing analysis all the events occur at the same time,if not,then we are just analyzing a snapshot of an event happening in the past or testing to be,in present form all occur at same time.
for eg. einstein's body is still existing in a transformed state of dust,including of all those who have lived in the past or will come to exist in the so-called future,ourselves too.
first law of thermodynamics- nothing new can be created,nor destroyed,only transformed.
i hope this helps,even to some degree.
thanks
boris prashant.


Comment #5 by: joe on 29 Dec 2010, 13:08 UTC reply to this comment

i dont quiet understand quantum physics, but i believe there is no time, the past was before we are born and the future is death, we live in the hear and now the present, we are not growing old as time makes us believe, my opinion is we are born and live then die because our bodies are old, what has time got to do with it?...we need time that was invented just to measure were we need to be otherwise our brains wouldnt be able to cope and every thing wood happen in an instant, but from getting up and going to bed everything is just the same nothing changes, yesterday is like today and tomorrow is like today, the big picture.


Comment #6 by: boris prashant on 02 Mar 2011, 06:17 UTC reply to this comment

new observations reveal presence of 75 % dark matter/energy,this is present even under normal circumstances,which causes the matter to expand,while gravity pulls it in.unifying the both is still being worked out.(current state= don't know.)
as scientists doing research on these theories based on observations,form the concept of an event horizon.
example: if a person adjusts his clock accordingly an enters a black hole,he will no longer be able to calculate the effectiveness of his observations once he/she enters the hole or is under the influence of it.that is,(as thought),within a black hole time ceases to exist but space remains.
but the error still remains as, for the person not under its influence can still use the measure of time,while the one inside is trapped in the present.
the theory/formula unifying these two remarkably separate situations is still being worked out.the unifying theory of universe still exists,the result may or may not be in the form of a traditional fixed formula but that of an evolving change studied day-to-day.
(hope it helps,i could be wrong) :)


Comment #7 by: picko on 19 Jul 2011, 17:35 UTC reply to this comment

if time doesnt exist the neither does rate of travel being that speed is measured using time, therefore would it be safe to assume that it does not require an infinite amount of energy to move as fast as the speed of light or even faster for that matter.


Comment #8 by: picko on 19 Jul 2011, 17:47 UTC reply to this comment

if time does not exist then neither does speed [speed is distance vs. time]
couldnt we assume that it no longer would take energy to move through the universe at all ??? is movement real are we moving or is the universe moving are we just sitting still while the universe distorts and the location of everything in it changes??? if this is true then the fabric of the universe can be manipulated [gravity] if gravity did not exist would everything just stop

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM