NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Behavior/Humans

Behavior/Humans


Does Death Exist?

Maybe not, according to some quantum theorists

By Vlad Tarko, Senior Editor, Sci-Tech News

17th of January 2006, 10:26 GMT

Adjust text size:


Such a question might seem inappropriate for the Sci/Tech section but, relax, I'm not going to talk about religion and the afterlife, I'm going to talk about quantum mechanics. Or more precisely, the consequences of certain popular interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics is first of all a mathematical tool for predicting the results of all sorts of experiments. This tool happens to be incredibly accurate - its predictions fit the facts extremely well. However, when people start wondering about the actual significance of what they're doing, things get tricky. I had once given a talk about the various interpretations of quantum mechanics and at the time I managed to find seven totally different interpretations. A week later I came across another one! Probably there are at least a dozen totally different interpretations out there and each physicist has his own slightly different opinion about what is real and what is not in the mathematical fabric of quantum mechanics.

One of the most popular interpretations however, and which is now supported by the proponents of String Theory (one candidate for the so called grand-unified theory - of quantum mechanics and gravity), is that the mathematics of quantum mechanics actually reflects reality itself.

The problem with that: In order to compute anything in quantum mechanics, one identifies all the possibilities,
assigns to each of them a certain tag (called 'amplitude of probability'), mixes up all the tags together and obtains a some sort of average tag (sums all the amplitudes), and then uses this average tag to say what is more or less probable to happen. The problem is that, if you take this mathematical scheme seriously, you are lead into believing the world around you is nothing but some sort of average world, and that, in Reality, all the possibilities actually co-exist beneath the surface of your observations. It's just that you are too dumb to see all the possibilities; you are just seeing some sort of average.

This may sound like rubbish (if it weren't for the experiments). One example: Everyone knows that light reflects from a mirror according to the reflection law (the incident angle is equal to the reflection angle). However, according to quantum mechanics, all the other possibilities (light reflecting in completely weird ways) do exist. It's just that, usually, they are eclipsed by the normal reflection law. Is it possible to make these possibilities visible?

Well, the mathematics of quantum mechanics tells you how to make them visible. It tells you: Get rid of most of the mirror, make all sorts of very closely tied scratches on a remote part of the mirror, and light will reflect at unusual angles. Well, this actually works! You can verify it yourself with the help of a laser pointer and a CD. If you point the laser to the surface of a CD you will see that light reflects from the CD in more than one way - in more than the usual reflection law kind of way.
So, does this prove that in fact all the possibilities co-exist? No. But it makes it reasonable for some people (e.g. the string theorists) to believe such a thing.
What does all this have to do with death?

When you apply such ideas as superposition to life (or to the universe as a whole), you get the idea that you yourself don't exist in just one instance, it may seem so to you in the same way as it wrongfully seems that light reflects from a mirror only via the reflection law, but 'in Reality' there is an infinity of instances of yourself co-existing with 'you'. You, the one you perceive, is just a sort of average you.

Now, you may perceive death similar to the event of getting rid of a part of the mirror and scratching the remaining piece. When you die, today's average you disappears, in the same way as the normal reflection law may be made to vanish. But you don't disappear completely, you just change your ways. In this way it may be argued that in fact you will never really die completely and maybe even that you were never really born.

This view also changes things like ghosts from being nothing but paranormal absurdities to quantum mechanical predictions. If you take such a string theorist view you are bound to believe that ghosts exist!

It seems fascinating to me that modern fundamental physics is compatible with such ideas. Although I personally am totally against this kind of interpretation of quantum mechanics, as you can see from what I write on quantum teleportation, it is interesting that the experiments conducted so far don't actually deny the possibility of such beliefs.

Image credits: Touch of Death #3 cover, G.W. Fisher

Quantum Teleportation - The Fabricated Mystery

Superfluidity makes headlines once again

First Quantum Chip Takes Us One Step Closer to Quantum Computers
Read by 7,379 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.9/5) 16 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Eddie on 21 Sep 2008, 00:40 GMT reply to this comment

When you refer to adjusting your ways,what consequence does it cause?


Comment #2 by: Tristan on 15 Dec 2008, 20:54 GMT reply to this comment

It is interesting how closely we see western science, especially with regard to quantum and/or atomic related application, get towards "discovering" the actual structure, production, and maintenance of the universe (and life). It is interesting because such information has been readily available for thousands of years from Santana Dharma, and passed down through the ages by a few dedicated spiritual "scientists." Of course, their exploration of the universe cannot rightly be called "science" because it predates our concept of such study. However, they long ago revealed (using the unparalleled technology of mind power) the structure, production, and maintenance of all existence to reflect three qualities. In the most relevant sense, this is the physical, astral, and causal dimension of all matter within this universe—the physical being composed of frozen energy particles, the astral being composed of quantum/electric subatomic particles, and the causal being the structural foundation of every instant since this universe first began timing itself. The causal field has been explained as the conscious "thoughts" of God, willing creation into existence (constantly and continually). Yet perhaps we can consider the causal field as the manifestation of complicated forces which lead towards occurrences with insignificant probabilities (which might be nearly every single feature of our universe, considering its advanced present state with its relatively young age). Anyways, I’m rambling, but I sometimes wonder what a few simple words might do for a few intelligent minds awaiting their ascension from plato’s cave.


Comment #3 by: David Clarke on 25 Feb 2009, 11:09 GMT reply to this comment

The description of the processes in this article are splendid. Since being made aware of quantum theory some years ago I have had similar thoughts of its effect on what we understand to be death. As I unfortunately do not have the academic ability to comprehend in depth the more advanced intricacies of the quantum state I was very pleased to stumble upon this article. Thank you.

Dave.


Comment #4 by: paul thompson on 27 Apr 2009, 19:22 GMT reply to this comment

I have been through 3 experiences that should have resulted in my death. As far as I am aware, I can not die (however I am ageing so travelling toward an outcome of some sort). I have a photographic memory, so I am acutely aware of little things that have changed throughout the day, yet should have remained the same. I also give off electromagnetic energy in times of stress. Bulbs blow, and computers hate me. Any ideas?
Paul.


Comment #5 by: Jon on 02 Nov 2009, 18:35 GMT reply to this comment

This is stupid...if you shine light off of a CD or scratched mirror OF COURSE it isn't gonna reflect at the correct angle of a flat mirror! By creating those ridges you provide a surface for the light to bounce off at an angle defined by that raised surface. So the fact that he was portraying there is wrong.

Am I saing that I don't believe that there is other parallel universes? No.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM