NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Health

Health


Does Circumcision Decrease Sexual Sensitivity?

A new research says no

By Stefan Anitei, Science Editor

28th of July 2007, 09:02 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
This is seen by many people as a form of genital mutilation, similar to what they do in west/central/northeastern Africa to women, practice aimed to decrease sexual sensitivity and pleasure.

Many researches have revealed a decreased penis sensitivity in the case of circumcised penises. But a new research made at the Department
of Psychology of McGill University in Montreal comes to challenge this. The authors say that sexual sensation in circumcised and uncircumcised men may not be so notable after all. They made genital sensory testing on circumcised and uncircumcised men during states of sexual arousal and non-arousal.

The results revealed no difference between the two groups in sensitivity to touch or pain. "This study suggests that preconceptions of penile sensory differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men may be unfounded," said lead author Dr. Kimberley Payne.

"People have been arguing about the sexual effects of circumcision for at least 1,000 years and I hope these data will encourage more research," said co-author Dr. Yitzchak M. Binik, Professor of Psychology at McGill and Director of the Sex and Couple Therapy Service of the McGill University Health Center.

The authors signal that the scar tissue formed from circumcision, but also the functional and mechanical changes linked to sexual activity, are factors that could have secondary effects on the genital sensitivity and should be investigated in future researches.

"In this fascinating study performed by renowned sexual medicine researchers, not only do they dispel the myth that the glans penis is more sensitive in the uncircumcised male due to the protective function of the foreskin, but they show that both circumcised and uncircumcised participants were less sensitive to touch overall during sexual arousal. This appears to be an important factor in the normal sexual response and pleasure," wrote Irwin Goldstein, Editor-in-Chief of The Journal of Sexual Medicine.

"While more research is needed, diminishing genital sensitivity during sexual arousal may be an important factor helping protect against pain during sexual activity."

TAGS:

circumcision | penis | sensation
Read by 6,656 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.5/5) 6 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


What Is the Kanamara (Iron Penis) Festival?

Penis Lubricant Could Stop HIV and Genital Herpes

The Vagina/Penis Parasite Fish!

Egg Laying Mammal Found Alive in the Mountains of New Guinea

How Does HIV Infection Spread Inside the Body?

Oral Sex Can Transmit HIV!

Green Monkeys' HIV Explains How We Will Get Rid of HIV

Marital Sex, The Greatest Risk for HIV Infection in the Case of Women

Which Are the Targets of the Vaccines of the Future?

How Do Sex Hormones Protect You After Trauma?

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Anon on 06 Jun 2008, 11:36 GMT reply to this comment

A study that shows us "no difference" doesn't disprove a study that shows some difference. Such studies use statistics, and statistics is up to interpretation. I am not dismissing his findings. However, to really understand his finding, we need the real data, because even a little difference can be interpreted as "no difference." For example, if their sample size were small, then statistical noise would likely not "support" a "significant difference," while a larger sample size would "support" significance. So sample size of the study can be a factor.

Also, we would get a better idea of the issue if we compare a few study instead of just one.... something of statistics' concern. It's like rolling a die, and asking if it is loaded. By definition of conventions of statistics, an unloaded die will appear to be loaded once every 20 times. My question is, is this the study that is the one in twenty? Besides, the author of this one study may be biased.

I am opposed to routine infant circumcision and am in support of maintaining a person's choice.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM