Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Music

March 17th, 2010, 15:09 GMT · By

Director Michel Gondry Blasts Lady Gaga and Her ‘Art’

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Lady Gaga is “considered high art just because of the way she dresses,” director Michel Gondry says
Enlarge picture
Undoubtedly, the release of Lady Gaga’s latest music video, “Telephone,” a collaboration with Beyonce, has gotten people talking of just how much farther she can go in terms of pushing the envelope and challenging what is acceptable. Gaga herself says it’s her mission to “convolute everyone’s idea of what a pop music video should be,” but famed director and screenwriter Michel Gondry simply can’t see it in this light.

Speaking with Movieline, the director, who’s worked so far with some of the biggest names in the music industry, creating “indelible” music videos, as the publication calls it, blasts Gaga for both her latest vid and what she stands for in the industry. Personally, he’s not a fan of her music because he doesn’t see anything more to it than just what lies at the surface, but her videos aren’t that great either. Her most recent, for “Telephone,” is no exception, prompting the director to conclude that she’s only getting this kind of attention because she dresses unlike any other pop star.

“I’m not interested. To me it’s like a form of Marilyn Manson. It’s hard for me to talk about it; I’ve seen a couple of videos of hers, and not for very long. I stop watching them each time because I don’t think there’s melodies. I’m sorry to be negative. Like I’m not a big fan of Madonna. I respect her very much, but unfortunately the videos didn’t help the music in the long run. Well, I guess it helped it to survive to the point where the video was irrelevant. So music has to find its own way, which is good for the music. It becomes smaller and more alive and it’s not as crazy, except for some R&B. To me, it’s just talking about the surface. I compare it to Marilyn Manson. The music to me is very expected. I don’t think there’s anything in the tone or the melody that makes me say, ‘Oh, there’s something going on.’… And I like commercial music,” Gondry explains.

“Michael Jackson will always be my favorite pop musician; he was for years and years until his death, which was horrible to me. So I like pop culture. But to me, even if it’s popular, there is a quality in the music you have to be able to appreciate. And I don’t see it. Her melodies are very conventional. I remember when my friend and I would argue about Killing Joke. I remember him saying, ‘It’s so great!’ But I said, ‘It’s so conventional! How can you find anything original? It’s just surface!’ I don’t know, maybe the comparison is ridiculous. But the melody was very, very flat. That’s probably why they are famous. But maybe it’s considered high art just because of the way she dresses?” the director and Oscar-winning screenwriter further says.

Though Gaga fans will undoubtedly disagree, there are also those who applaud Gondry for standing up and speaking what should have been spoken ever since she broke in the spotlight. Lady Gaga shocks, there is no doubt to that, but it could very well be that there is nothing behind her doing that; in other words, her mission to deconstruct pop music and pop culture may be as devoid of substance as pop itself, they say. See here for more on that.  

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,290 hits · 7 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Facebook Group Wants Meryl Streep in Gaga Video

MTV Denies Banning Gaga’s ‘Telephone’ Video

Lady Gaga Almost Collapses in Concert in Auckland, New Zealand

MTV, Other Networks Ban Gaga’s ‘Telephone’ Video

Gaga Subjected to Body Search at Airport

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Chuckjones on 18 Mar 2010, 07:07 UTC reply to this comment

Meanwhile, Gaga's knocking 'em dead in New Zealand and Australia, as she did in the US, Ireland and the UK. The haters must hate that. I saw her in the US - she was amazing. Going again when she returns this summer. She said she was going to bring show biz back to pop, and she's done it. I thought the Telephone video was funny, entertaining and full of ideas. It's better every time I see it. My favorite videos remain Poker Face and Bad Romance, but Telephone is still the best music video (if you want to call it that) produced since Bad Romance. Beyonce was incredible in it. Kudos to Gaga for giving her such a prominent role and great outfits.


Comment #2 by: ScottD on 18 Mar 2010, 09:59 UTC reply to this comment

So what??? An obscure French film director saw a parts of a couple of Lady Gaga videos and was able to form an opinion on her work or on the international zeitgeist??? It seems like professional jealousy.


Comment #3 by: Jason on 18 Mar 2010, 12:09 UTC reply to this comment

It pains me that someone used the term zeitgeist in conjunction with Lady Gaga.


Comment #4 by: T-Bomb on 13 Apr 2010, 07:38 UTC reply to this comment

I normally don't do this but It's more fun than studying for a silly exam at 2AM.


Just because a musical artist does well commercially, it doesn't mean that they write music with any sort of depth or artistic value. The two properties are, for the most part in today's music scene, largely uncorrelated. In fact I would argue that a substantial amount of music that does well commercially has very little intrinsic artistic value. If you were to ask me why this I believe this, I would probably hint at the idea that mainstream music is generally created in an effort to generate profit and not to progress the dimensions of art for the benefit of human development. Then you may ask "well then why do I like it and why do so many others agree with me?". Well I would have to blame not only a slight lack of education and experience with the art itself (in this case music and possibly film) but also I would argue that and individual who truly finds "depth" in Gaga's writing hasn't spent much time or effort looking into music (or film for that matter) which actually is considered to be at the forefront of artistic boundaries and creative ideas.

Now that's not to say that I can't understand why Gaga's videos are attractive. They offer a new twist on pop art that does hint that there is a possibility for creativity other than the norm (that being what's presented through most mainstream media, to a “mainstream” listener - especially when it comes to media owned by major music labels). Unfortunately, I have to agree with Gondry in this instance. Other than the shock value and sheer humorous nature of the whole concept in the video I have trouble seeing much artistic value in it. It is however quite interesting to see how so many people now pay attention to this artist because she is throwing in "twists" such as bright colours or obscurely shaped costumes in a seemingly "normal" settings (eg. telephone eye-patch in a diner). I know this sounds facetious but bear with me. I think there is a large difference between being a performer and being an “artist”. I think Gondry is getting at is that Gaga doesn't really challenge music as an art but rather just uses gimmick methodology (like many pop stars before her) to stand out.

What's disheartening is that someone would brush off the fact that one of the most creative minds of our time (i.e. Gondry) chose to stand up against the general consensus to be honest about what he thinks has value in music. The fact that you would call Gondry a “An obscure French film director” makes me even more disheartened and frustrated. This only leads me to deduce that you have very little experience in viewing any kind of film truly worth watching... I would suggest checking out some of Gondry's work such as his music video with Radiohead or better yet download the movie “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”. If you still think he's a crank well then I don't know if I can debate any further since it becomes a purely subjective matter.

The final point I'll mention is that Gaga is quoted as saying she wants to “convolute everyone’s idea of what a pop music video should be,”. What does that even mean? I think what she's trying to say is she wants to convolute what most crappy commercial music videos should be, as in “wake up people most mainstream vids suck. Why don't you try expanding your creative intake a bit?”.

I honestly think that Gaga does have a sliver of artistic ability in the costumes/shock fashion aspect. I think this is why people find her so attractive because she's offering a product that appears to be different than those before her (i.e. possibly hints of real art seeping in). However, take away the video and her music is full of cheesy electronic sounds (probably not even created by her), boring rhythms, and poorly layered vocal harmonies. And Gondry's right if she is writing the melodies they're very weak in terms of any attractiveness beyond the vocals (which I wouldn't even brag about especially since the most exciting part is when they're chopped electronically) [and don't even get me started on lyrics].

Anyways feel free to bash my personal outlook on this whole ordeal. I love a good debate. I would like to make one final analogy though. Developing a good understanding and appreciation for true art takes a little time and effort, much like developing a palette for good wine (about which I have no clue). Maybe it's possible that you're missing out on a massive amount of entertainment that could leave you much more satisfied and replenished and you just haven't given it the chance. Maybe it's ok for someone who maybe has spent a little more time tasting all the different tastes to express dislike in the “Purple Kraft Dinner” (woa crazy!) of pasta dishes...


Comment #5 by: Nomis on 13 Apr 2010, 20:22 UTC reply to this comment

A lot of the people who read a bestselling novel, for example, do not read much other fiction. By contrast, the audience for an obscure novel is largely composed of people who read a lot. That means the least popular books are judged by people who have the highest standards, while the most popular are judged by people who literally do not know any better. An American who read just one book this year was disproportionately likely to have read ‘The Lost Symbol’, by Dan Brown. He almost certainly liked it.

— The Economist

Comment #5.1 by: Jhern on 04 Mar 2011, 05:43 GMT

Well said!


Comment #6 by: Jhern on 04 Mar 2011, 05:48 UTC reply to this comment

Gondry has worked with Bjork, Beck, Radiohead....his standards are high. I can't stomach Lady Gaga. It's probably because I don't believe her. I don't believe she is this unique artist. She reminds me of a first year art student that has been exposed to this whole new world and she's going straight to creating abstract art without first learning the basics.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM