NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
Home / News / Technology / Systems

Systems


Dell, Sun to Quarrel over Blade Servers

Apples are not quite a good match to peanuts

By Bogdan Botezatu, Hardware Editor

29th of January 2008, 10:08 GMT

Adjust text size:


HP C-Class blade server
Enlarge picture
PC and server vendor Dell last week announced the availability of a new blade chassis and server. It seems that each time a new server kicks in, the allegedly perfect equilibrium between the major server
players (HP, IBM, Dell and Sun) snaps and all hell breaks lose.

This is somewhat normal, as the server business is a great revenue magnet and seems to be the engine of the x86 business. Dell's newcomer triggered such a scandal by simply attempting at competing with HP and IBM's units in technical specifications (performance, energy efficiency and simplicity of packaging).

Dell claims in the issued press releases that it has revolutionized performance and packaging tests. The standard benchmarking procedures involve the usage of the SPECjbb2005 tool, but it has to be applied on systems belonging to the same class in order to be efficient. How would it sound to compare a dual-processor server platform to the latest model of Asus Eee PC and claim that the latter is a bad choice as server?

IBM, Dell and HP use the same Xeon chips and same hardware base configuration. However, Dell managed to score a raw performance of 25 percent over HP and IBM. But Dell did not benchmark its products against Sun's Blade 6000 chassis that comes in a somewhat similar configuration. Dell's M1000e chassis can hold up to 16 slim blades rigged with two processors each in a 10U chassis, while the Blade 6000 can only hold 10 blades in a 10U unit.

Sun executive Marc Hamilton was pretty annoyed at Dell's "omission" and wrote it down in a blog post. "Dell's new blade does have half the memory, half the CPUs, half the disks that the SunBlade 6000 can pack in the same 10 RU of space, but that is not all it's missing, it also comes up short with no RAID5/6, no SAS backplane and no storage blade," Hamilton noted. "Of course just for fun, I went ahead and configured one of Dell's new blades on their web site, and received an estimated ship date of March 10. Can't wait until March 10th to get your blade, don't despair, you can get a SunBlade 6000 shipped to you in a few days."

Hamilton also seems to omit something: you cannot compare four-socket blades against two-socket ones. Moreover, Sun's four-socket blades have yet to show up, so let's consider Sun and Dell even on that.

TAGS:

Sun | Dell | Blade Server | IBM | Hewlett-Packard


Rating:
Good (3.0/5) 5 vote(s) so far    

Read by 501 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article
Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2008 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Extending the Blades

IBM and Sun - The Blue Blades

Dell Gains Some Ground

Dell Gains The First Place

IBM Boosts Blade Servers' Performance

UltraSparc T2-powered Servers from Sun

Dell Servers with OpenSolaris Coming Soon

Intel to Unveil Two Low-Cost Clear Bay Server Platforms

Dell to Introduce New Blade Server Family: the PowerEdge

Lenovo to Acquire Server Technology License From IBM

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

You are not logged on. Comments can still be added, but they will have to be approved before going live.
Log on to get your comments posted and visible instantly.
Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Your review/opinion:

 






SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM