Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Movies

September 29th, 2010, 14:42 GMT · By

Darren Aronofsky to Direct Superman Reboot

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Darren Aronofsky may direct upcoming “Superman” reboot, produced by Chris Nolan
Enlarge picture
Four years after the box office disaster that was the reboot “Superman Returns,” Warner Bros. is again considering a reboot to the legendary franchise – and has just the man to do it in director Darren Aronofsky.

Reports in the blogosphere say that several directors are being considered for the job of bringing back the original caped crusader, a job that is anything but easy as the 2006 film proved.

However, of the lot, Aronofsky seems to be the one most likely to get the job, word has it, even though he has zero experience in the superhero / comics genre.

The director, who is now getting major Oscar buzz for “Black Swan,” has previous hits under his belt like “Requiem for a Dream,” “The Wrestler,” “The Fountain” and “Pi,” so there’s no doubting his worth as a director.

“The derby to helm the Christopher Nolan-produced Man of Steel pic has become the talk of the town. Nolan is knee-deep in the selection process, and he and producer/wife Emma Thomas will be heavily involved in the movie, so he’s looking for a director who is able to handle the elaborate production and willing to collaborate,” the Hollywood Reporter’s Heat Vision says.

“Word began to leak last week of directors who were meeting or will meet with Nolan and Warner brass for the relaunch of one of Hollywood’s biggest franchises,” says the e-zine.

“Duncan Jones (‘Moon’), Jonathan Liebesman (‘Battle: Los Angeles’), Matt Reeves (‘Cloverfield,’ this Friday’s ‘Let Me In’), Tony Scott and Zack Snyder are on the list,” Heat Vision says.

However, Aronofsky is in the lead in terms of odds of actually scoring directorial duties on the new reboot.

“Aronofsky, riding high on buzz generated by his upcoming ‘Black Swan,’ is still in active talks, according to sources. But it’s early,” the e-zine notes.

In another “Superman” related news, it seems that Nolan is very busy getting things done for the film to happen as soon as possible.

Even if he doesn’t have a lead yet (that is to say, no Superman is yet attached), word has it he’s set on getting Natalie Portman to be Louis Lane, in what ScreenCrave calls a rather odd move because he should find the male lead first.

For the time being, though, all of the above falls in the realm of speculation. Rest assured you’ll find out more about this here, the instant anything is made official. 

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,028 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


First Look at Chris Evans as Captain America

Ryan Reynolds Talks Deadpool Movie

Ryan Reynolds Reveals ‘Superhero’ Diet in GQ

‘Inception’ Is Still Number 1 at US Box Office

Next Hulk Will Be Made with Motion-Capturing Technology

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Kal El on 29 Sep 2010, 16:36 UTC reply to this comment

Superman was not a "disaster" at the box office. Of course Warners would have liked it to do better business,but the tepid and too long film within five days, took in over $84 million, a new record for Warner Bros., beating out The Matrix Revolutions (2003), which has since been surpassed by The Dark Knight (2008). Superman Returns went on to gross $200,081,192 in North America and $191 million internationally, earning $391,081,192 worldwide. Combine that with some very good DVD sales and you had a product that grossed well over $575 million. Not to shabby for a "disaster" whose budget total was $209 million. The starts and stops and money wasted on previous Superman film endeavors was factored in to the year that the pre-production was started.
Write what is truth, my friend.
Kal El

Comment #1.1 by: Elena Gorgan on 30 Sep 2010, 08:55 GMT

Kal El, while your numbers are accurate, we know that everything in this life is relative. Superman Returns was a disaster by comparison, not speaking strictly numbers: for the money invested, it did not return the profit Warners wanted.

Had it been the hit they were looking for, they wouldn’t have waited for so many years to start talking about a follow-up. Even more, they wouldn’t have done a “reboot” but a sequel – because, you know, the first flick was THAT successful. As it turns out, relativity won.

Superman Returns was also a “disaster” for the reasons you mention yourself, my friend: it was too long and too tepid. Reports said upon release the only reason it made money was because fans were too curious to miss it. A hit it certainly wasn’t, unfortunately.

Your comment is much appreciated, though. :) Best,

Elena

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM