Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

January 14th, 2011, 15:08 GMT · By

Dark Energy May Not Exist at All

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Studies of radio emissions from Jupiter helped the Durham team came to the new conclusions
Enlarge picture
A group of astronomers in the United Kingdom proposes that the errors experts discovered to exist in the “gold standard” of the Universe may in fact be a lot larger than previously calculated. This standard is set by results obtained with the WMAP satellite.

The spacecraft spent years analyzing the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which is the relic radiation left over after the Big Bang exploded everything into being.

Durham University expert astronomers Utane Sawangwit and Tom Shanks says that the WMAP results include data on the exponential expansion process the Cosmos has been undergoing since its first day. The process is called inflation, and it explains why the Universe is expanding increasingly fast.

The surveys the satellite conducted also covers the existence of dark matter and dark energy. In fact, it's WMAP datasets that let astrophysicists establish that the Cosmos is made up of 4 percent regular matter, 22 percent dark matter, and 74 percent dark energy.

The purpose of the NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe mission is to scan the CMB in search of variations in the background temperature this photon layer has. This is an all-sky survey.

Experts base their current view of the Universe on the patterns of temperature ripples that WMAP saw in the CMB during its surveys. Most of these ripples occupy about 1 degree in the sky, which is the rough equivalent of twice the area covered by the full Moon.

Scientific models that are designed to explain how the Universe is set up without using dark energy or dark matter propose the existence of small, narrower temperature variations in the CMB, which the satellite did not see in the actual studies.

What the Durham team did was test to see how much the WMAP survey smooths the CMB ripples. In order to do that, they had to look at a lot of point-like radio sources throughout the Universe.

They found evidence that “beam smoothing” from the satellite was a lot larger than scientists operating the satellite first calculated. The major implication of this is that models of the Universe that do not require the presence of dark matter or dark energy may be easier to prove.

In other words, it could be that the existence of dark energy is not as bullet-proof as originally thought, Daily Galaxy reports.

But the team that operates the satellite is happy to defend its science results. “We're happy to defend WMAP,” explains team member Gary Hinshaw, who is based at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), in Greenbelt, Maryland.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,087 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Large Galaxies Get New Dark Matter Maps

Explaining Gravitational Lensing Without Dark Matter

X Particle Could Explain the Universe

Dark Matter Could Cool Down the Sun's Core

Hubble Produces Universal Dark Matter Map

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: solaisenberg on 17 Jan 2011, 20:01 UTC reply to this comment

There is a lot of information already available about the universe - but most of it is wasted because of the wrong interpretations that the scientific community is currently using.

Before building massive new detectors and accelerators we should first make correct use of the information already available.

Examples: dark energy that depends upon the linear extrapolation of the Hubble linear dependence on distance to the point where the photon energy goes to zero.

Example: assuming that the redshift shows recession of galaxies based upon belief that it is due to the Doppler effect - neglecting the gravitational red shift contribution.

Example: assuming that the supposed receding velocity of galaxies showing that the universe is expanding - leading to the unproven belief in the big bang.

and more ---

Comment #1.1 by: Whatever on 31 Jan 2012, 22:32 GMT

Quit Acting Like You Know What Your Talking About.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM