Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Movies

May 15th, 2009, 14:50 GMT · By

Dan Brown Is a Terrible Writer, ‘Angels & Demons’ Star Says

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


“Angels & Demons” star Stellan Skarsgard says Dan Brown is a terrible writer
Enlarge picture
The 2006 “The Da Vinci Code,” starring Tom Hanks, fared incredibly well at the box-office, having first managed to create quite a controversy and upset all the important players at the Vatican with the topic approached. Three years later, Hanks returns in the sequel, also based on a Dan Brown book, “Angels & Demons,” but star Stellan Skarsgard says, if anything, Brown should not have gotten into the business of writing.

According to the actor, Brown is not a good writer. As a matter of fact, he’s so terrible at what he does that he only accepted the part in “Angels & Demons” after reading the movie script, meaning, after several considerable modifications had been made to the plot. The star also compares Brown’s writings to peanuts, a snack many people eat without even liking, simply because they can’t seem to be able to stop.

“I think Dan Brown is a terribly bad writer, but he has cliffhangers after every chapter which makes you continue reading.” Skarsgard said for Swedish broadcaster SVT, as cited by USA Today. “It’s like eating peanuts at a bar. You don’t like them, but you keep on eating them anyway.” he added. Still, the actor insists “Angels & Demons” is much better than the first film because it has a much simpler plotline, while also being more dramatic.

In all fairness, critics have welcomed “Angels & Demons” much more warmly than they have “The Da Vinci Code.” They still argue, though, that director Ron Howard, albeit a brilliant craftsman who knows how to build a scene to really cause an impression, needs to understand that any movie labeled as a “thriller” must have thrills no matter what, which is far from the case with “Angels & Demons,” of which many say it might prove a tad too “boring.”

However, since enjoying it could prove to be just a matter of taste in the end, fans are urged to see the film regardless of negative or positive reviews. “Angels & Demons” is already running in several European countries, and it drops in US theaters today. As regards the earlier mentioned campaign against it carried out by the Vatican, just recently, it was revealed that the Vatican had reviewed the film and found it “innocent.”

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,873 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


The Vatican to Boycott Tom Hanks’ ‘Angels & Demons’

First ‘Expendables’ Promo Posters Hit Cannes

Heath Ledger’s ‘The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus’ Screened, Looking for Buyers

Fox Confirms Deadpool Spinoff

‘Inglourious Basterds’ Is a Masterpiece, Quentin Tarantino Says

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Kristine on 20 May 2009, 17:25 UTC reply to this comment

“I think Dan Brown is a terribly bad writer, but he has cliffhangers after every chapter which makes you continue reading.”

LET ME SEE : TERRIBLY BAD WRITER ... isn't this Redudant? I think you should think twice before uttering something and... telling someone that hmm.. they are "TERRIBLY Bad WRITER" oops!


Comment #2 by: Paul on 26 Nov 2009, 14:42 UTC reply to this comment

Kristine,

"LET ME SEE : TERRIBLY BAD WRITER ... isn't this Redudant? I think you should think twice before uttering something and... telling someone that hmm.. they are "TERRIBLY Bad WRITER" oops!"

What point are you trying to make here? It makes no sense!

P.s. What does "Redudant" mean?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM