NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Entertainment / Cinema

Cinema


Dakota Fanning, Naked and Raped

All in the sacred name of art...

By Elena Gorgan, Entertainment News Editor

21st of July 2006, 13:03 GMT

Adjust text size:

The 12-year-old actress has no problems with nudity or violent scenes when it comes to her movies. Dakota will be the star of 'Hounddog', a movie about violence, abuse and Elvis Presley adulation and the character she plays is subject to rape and must appear naked or wearing only underpants in some of the scenes.

Both Fanning's mother, Joy, and her manager, say that the movie is a potential Oscar contender and they manifest no objection to the director's idea whatsoever.

Even more, her agent is very thrilled about the rape scene, which was already filmed, as he puts it himself:

'It's not just the rape scene - the whole story is challenging Dakota as an actress. And I've never been so proud of her in my life. I've seen the dailies, and in every scene she gets better and better'.

The investors refused to agree with the little actress' representatives and, at the present moment, the movie is put on hold because of the lack of funds. This may come as a shock, considering the fact that the little girl has proven all along that her image and her name are very bankable and especially that 'Hounddog' is only a $5 million project.

One of the persons who did not agree to finance the film explains his attitude in a brief interview: 'The two taboos in Hollywood are child abuse and the killing of animals. In this movie, both things happen'.
Read by 103,250 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.5/5) 29 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Tom Cruise Gave Dakota Fanning A Cell Phone For Her Birthday

Denise Richards Gives the Clothes Off Her Back

Naked Actresses - Hot Issue on Debate

Will Superman Pose Naked?

Britney Naked, Pregnant and Desperate

Gillian Anderson to Reveal Her Breasts on the Big Screen

Natalie Portman in the Full Monty

Britney Looks Better Naked...

Lindsay Lohan Is Willing to Take Her Clothes Off for Fame

Salma Hayek and Colin Farrell in the Nude

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: fran_tangela on 16 Apr 2007, 19:48 GMT reply to this comment

When I learned that Dakota Fanning was doing (had done) a rape

scene, my heart broke. I actually cried. I love Dakota Fanning. She

is an extraordinary actress. She is so adorable and her personality

is tremendously sweet and happy. But now someone decides that

having Dakota Fanning (a child) raped in a scene is Oscar-worthy.

And what's even worse is her own mother agrees. I don't care that

all you see in the scene is Dakota's hand and maybe her bare

shoulder, it is a rape scene involving a wonderful child. Once

again, Hollywood has finally corrupted another wonderful, innocent

Human Being. SHAME on her mother and her Agent for allowing it. You

want Oscar-worthy material from Dakota? Try watching "Man on Fire",

"War Of The Worlds", "Hide and Seek" or ANY film that Dakota

Fanning has been in! This child IS Oscar-Worthy. And she DOESN't

have to have her clothes removed and her very essence violated to

prove it! SHAME ON HER MOTHER FOR ALLOWING THIS HORRIBLE EVENT TO

HAPPEN!

Comment #1.1 by: Angry.At.Idiots on 03 May 2007, 17:53 GMT

Seriously though -Fran T. -do you NOT realize how OUT OF YOUR MIND you are!?! Dakota is not your little perfect innocent version of a lost childhood! SHE IS A MEGA STAR ACTRESS!! Secondly- I dunno what skin YOU grew up in, but EVERY kid I knew was WELL AWARE of what was between their legs (boy AND girl)!!! Quit it with this fantasy land horseshit of a lust free innocent childhood-everyone with a brain is SICK OF IT!!
This is NOT a rape scene directed by H.Bosch, or H.P.Lovecraft!! She is NOT nude head to toe,we do NOT see her "innocent" piggly wigglies conveying all YOU imply! There is NO bare ASS shot of a child, as is JOYFULLY WELCOMED in ANY gyno-flick over the past 2 decades!! I've seen SO MUCH kiddie gentials through mass media in the name of innocent art, & in the name of a parent's right to let their kids run around nude cuz it's so cute, regardless of genre! That you say what you do in regards to THIS example, simply betrays your sentiments as mindless dribble, misdirected by another invisible idiot amidst the ever breeding masses.
Your opinion is a poster child for depicting all that is woefully inept in this society, & how a cross-eyed, inbred, bobble head like G.Bush could be RE-elected during the vag-centric election campaign we were all forced to endure! I describe it as so, b/c you would've expect such vitale issues to be raised as child rape, but alas nothing but abortion is muttered. I see. If you & your croonies spent MORE time concerned with REALITY, instead of THEATRE, this world wouldn't be the toilet you infer it to be! Alas, you were all too busy forgetting what went on while we let his daddy run the nation NOT a decade earlier. Somehow this movie is what is important.
Dakota was NOT raped!! (REREAD THAT) Because apparently that matters LESS to you & your like minded leeches, than the REAL innocent children that ARE RAPED EVERY GOD DAMN DAY-with NOTHING done about it! This is a society that NEEDS Movies to react to, like it or not! If you REALLY abhore child porn & child rape, you SHOULD recognize this as what it is, & why a "little innocent" like Dakota would be SO eager to take on the role!!!
She is NOT advocating child rape. Her family is NOT advocating child rape. Movies exist that depict child rape with no-name child actresses, which resulted in NO MOVEMENT, & NO attention!
If pretending to be raped & showing some "shoulder" invokes YOU to CRY-but not shed a tear to be bothered about REAL child rape-then you should truely be sentenced to death immediately. That is absolutely rational, & absolutely true! People who agree with your opinion are wastes of life & destroying society everyday! This is a f-a-c-t. Reevaluate the relevance of your perspective, what it IS you are talking about here, then CALL a hotline to speak to real rape victims & learn something!
"Hollywood has finally corrupted another wonderful innocent Human Being"!? Again-do you NOT realize how utterly out of your mind you are!? Hollywood has corrupted our wonderful innocence with so many examples of low brow horseshit, that I couldn't possibly list it all here, but this film is what draws the line for you!? It wasn't EVEN released!!! (as of this date) You need to educate yourself quick, before you infect otherwise intelligent people around you.
In an age where I MUST be molested every 10 minutes in my home-AGAINST MY WILL- with another emotionally laden lie of a whore commercial. Flaunting deception, Sex, & false insinuations, which bank on & exploit the very sincere empathy you are attempting to exhibit here. While kids are openly sold for sex across the 3rd world, & the free-est nation on Earth elects a wacko thumper as its Pres. to scab-pick a world war III - ALL YOU can find to CRY about is a role in a movie an ACTRESS is playing in the hopes of dragging awareness into this reality tv, smut guzzling culture!! Oh yeah-the movie DOES NOT EXIST !!!!!!!!!!!!! How about spending some sincere emotion saving REAL VICTIMS,& keep your little fragile whimpers for when your favorite flavor of ice cream is sold out at the local ShopRite! So it's actually shame on YOU, & your like minded twits, for being exactly who you are, instead of the postulated ideal you actually can't describe accurately. If this world was 100% devoid of child porn & child rape you would have a point, b/c this would be an introduction, but what you say is SO beyond meaningless, that it is HIGHLY offensive. This wasn't to be a pro rape film, unlike the pro murder fests I don't see you harping against EVERY summer.
Other than those trivialities, I agree that she IS an Oscar worthy actress now, without bearing the skin! I also agree that actresses should NOT have to be naked to win an award- adult/child/cgi/ or animal. This will not alter the smut slung in my face by mainstream media, regardless of the tickets,mags,etc that I don't buy, in order to NOT support it. You want to bash something, attack those media whores that rape our ADULT innocence & integrity away at least 4 separate 900 second occations per hour!!! Maybe then an ADULT wouldn't write the script.
In my opinion, ridiculous or profound, from what I've seen so far; Dakota Fanning is actually the ONLY child actress CAPABLE, of doing a film completely naked the WHOLE TIME, & forcing our attention beyond her buttcrack & on her performance. She doesn't even do a single scene nude & you garner this tear jerking opinion?!
You really need help. You really need help.You really need help. Unfortunately you won't seek it, & even worse is the FACT, that you are probably among the lowest on the ladder of society's flaws. Perhaps if your views were more relevant, we'd be living IN that world where such a movie script could tarnish or corrupt our innocent persuit of happiness. That you think it does so, here in our world of primetime smut, speaks only to your inability to observe what is occuring around you.
Please take my words dearly, & to be directed at your state of mind, as well as toward those who share your perspective. I do not know YOU, outside of your conveyed opinions here, & do not intend to insult your soul, or genetic constituents, beyond their contribution to your state of mind.


Comment #2 by: jaxx0rr on 16 Aug 2007, 02:50 GMT reply to this comment

true, so true
nuf said


Comment #3 by: Anna on 09 Apr 2008, 13:17 GMT reply to this comment

Are you done? I doubt it. My guess is you're still rambling on in your mind, if only to hear your own thoughts, which undboutedly are the only ray of light in your otherwise dark and miserable life. I mean honestly - you're obviously trying VERY, VERY, VERY hard to sound intelligent and original. If only you knew how completely deluded and self-indulgent you truly come across. And to spend that much time on a post like this - how sad is that!?!? All of that time and energy put forth just to defend a movie that depicts the rape of a 12 year old girl. I think, even those that support your post, are thinking one thing. Yup - no doubt - definitely a pedohile.


Comment #4 by: ray on 17 Jun 2008, 05:35 GMT reply to this comment

hey anna, shut up, apparently YOU'RE trying very very very hard to sound intelligent. Its called freedom of speech, he can say whatever he thinks and wants cuz thats what this is for, expressing your opinions and thoughts on the subject, he was defending/stating what he thinks, so unless its about the subject, dont post in the means to TRY to put others down to make yourself feel better about your pety life . you didnt evan say anything about the subject, which btw i agree with him


Comment #5 by: TWC on 12 Sep 2008, 18:42 GMT reply to this comment

OK, I usually don't post such places, but felt the need to post this time. I have been a fan of Dakota's for quite some time, since I saw the natural talent that lies within her. As for Hounddog, which is the subject, and the specific scene, being the so-called "rape scene", I must tell you, that this scene, in itself, portrays an occurrence that most likely, from my own research, occurred more often than not during the time period this film is set in.

In this film, Dakota is NOT nude. There are no scenes that promote any illegal or immoral activity, but rather bring to focus that these things happen and something must be done to stop it. Movies are a depiction of real life in many cases. This story is just that, a depiction of real life.

Dakota put her heart into this role and regardless of your personal opinions of whether or not the story should contain such material, you should all support her endeavors. She IS an Oscar Quality actress, and deserves all the recognition she can get for her role in this film.

And, everyone needs to look past her "age". She is not a child any longer, but a young lady who is starting to get much more mature and more difficult roles. Let her perform these roles and applaud her for her abilities. Same goes with the directors and writers of her films.

The fact of the matter is that child rape occurs even today, and if this is the type of film that needs to be created to bring that issue to soceity to open their eyes, then that's what it takes. I am against abuse of any kind towards children and I applaud anyone that brings the issue to the viewers to open their eyes and make them see what's going on in this world of ours and what's happening to our children, whether it be sexual, physical, or mental abuse.

I will support Dakota in this film and in any other roles she takes on in the future.

I've babbled on enough.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM