Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > History

June 18th, 2007, 12:57 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

DNA Analysis Has Cleared Up The Origins of the Etruscans

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Etruscan warrior
Enlarge picture
Tuscany's name in modern days comes from the Etruscans, a very advanced ancient civilization, highly influential in the development of the early Roman civilization. But the origins of the Etruscan civilization has been a vivid debate amongst archaeologists, historians and linguists for centuries.

Three are three main theories about their origin: they came from Anatolia (modern day Turkey), as stated by the Greek historian Herotodus; they developed from the local Iron Age Villanovan society, as suggested by another Greek historian, Dionysius of Halicarnassus; or they came from an Indo-European invasion from the north, like the Latins did.

Now, the most accurate approach, the DNA analysis, was applied. A team led by Professor Piazza has investigated genetic samples from three present-day Tuscany (central Italy) populations from in Murlo, Volterra, and Casentino. "We already knew that people living in this area were genetically different from those in the surrounding regions. Murlo and Volterra are among the most archaeologically important Etruscan sites in a region of Tuscany also known for having Etruscan-derived place names and local dialects. The Casentino valley sample was taken from an area bordering the area where Etruscan influence has been preserved."

This DNA samples were compared to those coming from healthy males from Northern Italy, the Southern Balkans, the island of Lemnos (Greece), Turkey, and the Italian islands of Sicily and Sardinia.

The Tuscan samples came from individuals living in the area for at least three generations, based on their surnames, having a geographical distribution limited to the linguistic area of sampling. "We found that the DNA samples from individuals from Murlo and Volterra were more closely related those from near Eastern people than those of the other Italian samples. In Murlo particularly, one genetic variant is shared only by people from Turkey, and, of the samples we obtained, the Tuscan ones also show the closest affinity with those from Lemnos", Piazza said.

Previously, the same relationship had been found for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in the female lineages. Another mtDNA of local ancient breeds of cattle still living in Tuscany and other areas found a close link to those from Anatolia.

Many Etruscan
cities were continuously inhabited since the Iron Age, and the people who lived in the ancient Etruria region did not appear "out of the blue". The Etruscans took the Greek alphabet, and their inscriptions revealed a language developed in situ before their first historical record, in 800 BC, without any connection with the Indo-European languages, thus the third theory was totally excluded. By 265BC, the Etruscans were totally incorporated into the Roman Empire. "But the question that remained to be answered was - how long was this process between pre-history and history?" said Piazza.

In 1885, an inscription in a pre-Greek language discovered in the island of Lemnos, dated to about the 6th century BC, presented many similarities with the Etruscan language both in its form and structure and its vocabulary. Herodotus' theory, criticized by many historians, claimed that the Etruscans emigrated from the ancient region of Lydia (now western Turkey). Half the population sailed from Smyrna (now Izmir) until they reached Umbria in Italy.

Indeed, tombs discovered in ancient Lydia are extremely similar to those of the Etruscans. The Etruscans were also skilled sailors, who traded with the Greeks and Cartagena and the God of the Sea, Neptunus, was important in their religion.

The Lydian theory also links the Etruscans to the Minoans and "People of the Sea", seafaring raiders that were at war with the Egyptians in the 12th century BC. Their civilization was centered in Crete (now an island in southern Greece) and other neighboring islands (like Lemnos) and these people spoke non-Indo-European related languages. There are significantly increasing proofs that match the Crete and Minoan civilization to Atlantis and its decline in a huge ancient tsunami.

"We think that our research provides convincing proof that Herodotus was right and that the Etruscans did indeed arrive from ancient Lydia. However, to be 100% certain we intend to sample other villages in Tuscany, and also to test whether there is a genetic continuity between the ancient Etruscans and modern-day Tuscans. This will have to be done by extracting DNA from fossils; this has been tried before but the technique for doing so has proved to be very difficult." said Piazza.

"Interestingly, this study of historical origins will give us some pointers for carrying out case-control studies of disease today. In order to obtain a reliable result, we had to select the control population much more carefully that would normally be done, and we believe that this kind of careful selection would also help in studies of complex genetic diseases." he added.

The theory of Dionysos of Hallikarnas would have linked the Etruscans to the Basque, but the probability for Indigenous pre-Indo-European people to survive the massive Indo-European invasion for millennia and even impose their domination afterwards was relatively low.
FILED UNDER:
Etruscan
Roman
DNA
origin


16,512 hits · 16 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Giant Crabs Living in Roman Ruins

The Tomb of the King of the Magi Found Near Jerusalem

New Viagra Pills Made of Walnuts!

The First Virtual Model of Ancient Rome

The First Gladiator Graveyard Ever Discovered

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Ponto on 12 Oct 2009, 01:17 UTC reply to this comment

It is known that the Lydians spoke an Indo-European language, the Etruscans did not. The Lydians had more in common with the Latins, Celtic speaking peoples of Italy and their languages had a similiar origin point to Iranian, or Indian languages, that is somewhere in Asia. There are no indigenous languages left in Europe, barring Euskara. Saying the Etruscans are from Asia Minor is like saying English speakers in Britain come from India.

Comment #1.1 by: samaia on 29 Sep 2012, 20:58 GMT

There were many nations in Anatolia in ancient times. In Lydia as well (not only "Lydians"). Many of them non-Indoeuropeans or people only influenced culturally by Indoeuropeans. Using an Indo-european language doesn't mean being Indo-european in whole. Take a look at present day Turks. You know their origin. Do they differ much now from say people from Greece? This means I can't agree with you :)

Comment #1.2 by: PDR on 13 Jan 2013, 18:25 GMT

The Anatolian, non-Indo-European origin of the Etruscan language is not an isolated matter. There were quite a few non-IE peoples in this region several thousands of years BC, e.g. Hurrites, Hatti, and so on. The great Russian linguist Igor Diakonov showed very convincingly the genetic relationship between their languages and languages which still today are spoken in the north-eastern part of the Caucasus, such as Dagestan. Modern American linguists like John Bengtson and Merritt Ruhlen proved the genetic relationship between Basque and Dagestan languages. And the British linguist Ed Robertson publicized a breathtaking papar in 2006 showing the kinship between Etruscan and Dagestan. So, the circle is rounded: Basque, Etruscan, Dagestan, Hurritic, Hatti and most probably als Sumerian belong to one and the same languages family. Also relationship have been proven between these languages and Burushaski (in northern Pakistan), Yennisseian (in central Siberia), Sino-Tibetan and Na-Dene (in northern America). Al these languages together are aptly called the Dene-Caucasian language family. The origins of this mega-family lies probably in the region in Africa which we nouw call Sahara. Because of major climate changes at the end of the last Ice Age, inhabitants of this region migrated to the Middle East on the one hand, and to Marocco and a little bit later to Spain on the other hand. This explains the family relationship between Basque in Europe's south west and the other languages just mentioned in the Middle and, later on, Far East. The Etruscas were juist one of the many peoples of this family. By about 1200 BC they migrated to the centerpart of Italy.


Comment #2 by: Pauilo on 26 Oct 2009, 20:13 UTC reply to this comment

There is a Turkish hater in the place,Ponto are you Greek or Serbian.Ancient Etruscan in Turkey were probably half-half Lydian and Iranian since it was not uncommon to find Cimmerians and other Iranian tribe during the same period.


Comment #3 by: Richard Welch on 08 Dec 2009, 00:45 UTC reply to this comment

Ponto has a telling point. The Etruscans were not Indo- Europeans so they could not have originated in ancient Anatolia (Turkey). Some Anatolians are said to have fled to Etruria after the fall of Troy, which accounts for the genetic tie, but the true Etruscans were already there. (See Roots of Cataclysm, Algora Publ. NY 2009)


Comment #4 by: Neoetruscan on 11 Oct 2010, 01:23 UTC reply to this comment

this would tend to support my own theory of minoan origin based on cultural similarities

Comment #4.1 by: velthur on 11 Nov 2011, 18:12 GMT

The impact of barbarian invaders in Italy has been overestimated:Ghots and lombards were no more than 200000 and left a weak print in the italian genetic background;there is no trace of mass migration to Italy(except Sicily)after 568

Comment #4.2 by: Singeli on 11 Dec 2012, 02:39 GMT

Wouldn't there be a difference between the DNA of Minoans before the destruction caused by the eruption on Thera and the later, more warlike Mycenean civilization on Crete after it was invaded by Greeks?


Comment #5 by: Alex on 10 Apr 2011, 02:14 UTC reply to this comment

The legend of Ashina/Asena was one of ten sons born to a grey she-wolf mentioned in Chinese documents. Ashina reformed the Turkic confederation in Central Asia. That might be a coinsidence but we can't ignore the similarity betwen Romulus and Remus. Turks/Turkic peoples spread from Turkey to east and west. The language spoken or religion practised by them today cannot be a reason to deny the only countable scientific evidence (DNA) about Etruscans. Languages, religions, alphabets change, but DNAs are preserved. We need to keep state and religion seperate from science.


Comment #6 by: I don't have one that I am aware of on 29 Oct 2011, 10:00 UTC reply to this comment

The premises of this research are invalid. Murlo was destroyed and deserted for at least 1500 years, ther repopulated by immigrants from the Levant in Dark Ages. Volterra was destroyed during the Gothic wars and repopulated by immigrats from all quarters of the world. The Casentino is known for have a highly mixed population. The written records in Poppi's archives speak of immigrants coming in from as far as England and Scotland, not to speak of Syrians, Armenians Cipriots and Jews. No Etruscans survived the Gothic wars, the documents are clear. The "eastern" genes found by reaserchers in Tuscany refer to immigrants coming to fill an empty country between the VI century and the XIV century especially, but also later, a lot of Jews pushed out of Spain in 1492 came to the Casentino where surnames speak very clkearly. Giovanni Caselli

Comment #6.1 by: Frans on 13 Nov 2011, 14:09 GMT

It may be frivolous to speak that way about "eastern genes". DNA specialists can be rather specific about the time and place of SNP mutations. If the DNA found in Tuscany includes SNP mutations, which occurred in eastern Turkey in the 4th to 14th century, they would have come to different conclusions.


Comment #7 by: Dato on 29 Dec 2011, 02:05 UTC reply to this comment

I think that etruscan, basque,georgian and generally caucasian people are decendents of proto iberian people once leaved around the bleak sea

Comment #7.1 by: weirdo on 21 Jan 2012, 03:40 GMT

hhahaha, you people, in the end we are all descendant from two persons.


Comment #8 by: Josephine on 31 Jan 2012, 22:02 UTC reply to this comment

I can't believe I never read this since I have searched for information on the Sea people for some time, thinking they had a connection to the Etruscans before they settled in Italy. Thanks.


Comment #9 by: LibraryGuy on 11 Mar 2012, 19:27 UTC reply to this comment

Later research on Tuscan cattle revealed close similarities to Anatolian breeds. I think the case for Etruscan origins in Anatolia is fairly strong at this point. What I would really like is for someone (Cavalli-Sforza?) to compare Tuscan, SW Anatolian, and Cretan DNA. There are still gaps in this story.


Comment #10 by: ata on 31 Oct 2012, 03:16 UTC reply to this comment

E-Trusc : Turkic origin !

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM