Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Games > Gamer Diary

April 8th, 2011, 14:40 GMT · By

Crysis 2 Diary - PC Gaming, DirectX 11 And Why Crytek Should Focus on Consoles

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Crysis 2 looks great on PC even without DirectX 11
Enlarge picture
Crysis 2 is a great title, with its top notch gameplay and gorgeous graphics compensating for its lackluster story.

Sadly, even if it's quite an impressive game, it received quite a lot of critiques from PC gamers, who felt that Crytek betrayed them in multiple ways.

The first was because Crysis 2 would appear on platforms other than the PC, unlike the first two games, including the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.

Despite Crytek releasing multiple statements in which it revealed that it's not forgetting about the PC, many people already said before the game was released that they wouldn't purchase it.

The second main critique came after the game's launch, when PC owners were outraged that the title doesn't have a huge amount of graphics settings, which they could tweak, and that it doesn't have support for DirectX 11, the newest graphics interface software for the Windows platform.

Crytek opted to not even comment on the situation, which made some PC owners say that they were cheated out of a game, forgetting that even without a huge amount of visual customization options or DirectX 11, Crysis 2 still looked amazing when compared with other titles, which had such features.

While I do agree that Crytek could have handled these situations better, I'm actually pretty glad that Crysis 2 appeared on consoles, as the German developer could finally make some money out of its hard work.

Why am I saying this? Sales data released by the game's publisher, Electronic Arts, showed that customers favored the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of the game, which accounted for 57 and 29 percent of all sales, respectively, while the PC version was last, with just 14%.

The original Crysis and Crysis: Warhead, while getting a lot of hype around them, failed to become sales success stories largely because they were barely playable on all but the most powerful and expensive PCs.

I love all platforms and wish that all games would appear on them so that anyone can enjoy them.

But, after seeing a developer try its best to deliver a quality experience on the PC, and then get criticized because of technicalities, I'm beginning to favor more and more the current approach of Rockstar, which is just releasing titles for consoles, bypassing the PC altogether.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

10,272 hits · 7 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Download Crysis 2 Multiplayer PC Demo

Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 Leaked and Available for Download on Torrent Sites

New Crysis 2 Patch Arrives This Week

New Crysis 2 Update Now Available, Fixes Security Problems

Crysis 2 Diary - Playing as an Invisible Predator

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Robar on 08 Apr 2011, 15:27 UTC reply to this comment

This article is going entirely in the wrong direction. Well, what if all the developers just produced console games? Well, we will be stuck with crappy old Xbox 360 and PS3 for 2-3 more decades, still playing DirectX 9 titles. Crysis 2 is not an amazing title on PC. It lacks features PC games should have and it doesn't look better than Crysis. It is the best looking game on consoles because that is what the consoles get maxed out at.


Comment #2 by: Xessive on 10 Apr 2011, 11:31 UTC reply to this comment

The hardcore PC players and tweak-enthusiasts are certainly disappointed that Crysis 2 lacks configuration options on PC. I agree that these options should be mandatory, however I feel the criticisms were harsh and, in some instances, totally uncalled for.

Crytek have done a great job of streamlining the performance of Crysis 2 (technical and gameplay). It just would have been nice to have the option of tinkering with the settings like many of its peers.


Comment #3 by: Crysis Addict on 15 Apr 2011, 02:01 UTC reply to this comment

Sorry but the last paragraph is wrong in my opinion.Crytek promised a Crysis that would exceed the first ,look it up it is stated every where.I have the first and yes Crysis 2 is some what better ,better the very high only!!.Add to Crysis 1 the ultra high mods and now you have a old school engine out performing a brand new "state of the art" engine.Makes no sense to me to spend all that time on something that doesn,t exceed the original.That is why pc gamers are shouting out. They are tired of getting half * efforts.To say pc gaming is last or not worth it any more is pretty much telling all the video card an related PC hard ware makers to stop improving on PC hardware stuff because expecting high end pc gaming is whining.So when PC gaming disappears because programers are to lazy to take the time to make use of the latest tech then what happens to the massive PC hardware market.?? Why would i spend money on a high end gaming rig if all i am going to get it console graphics ?? lets all just buy consoles and let the PC fade out then.Sounds like millions lost to me.What worse is now some people want me to be pretend like Crytek did an technical break through game .no they did not and when i know * well they can do better and make a game that shatters the pc world with mind boggling graphics i wont settle for anything less.If they had said we will make crysis 2 as good as the first on all platforms then i guess i wouldn,t have anything to be angry about .Like i say look it up they promised a lot more then they delivered.


Comment #4 by: Silent on 15 Apr 2011, 03:11 UTC reply to this comment

I'm all for Cryteck making the money, because I believe they deserve it, because I enjoyed Crysis and Crysis 2. But for a columnist to advocate abandoning PC gaming entirely is atrocious to hear. Simply put, Crytek did abandon the PC with this release. Now supporting the PC doesn't mean abandoning the consoles. They can have the dumbed down lower version the hardware can run. Just give the flexibility to the PC gamers. PC gamers are going to be able to draw the best out of the programing, its a shame that they aren't letting us show that programming off.

Comment #4.1 by: Xessive on 18 Apr 2011, 11:57 GMT

The issue seems to be that the PC versions usually end up being poor ports. They create the games for the consoles and then rush to upscale them for the PC, rather than creating the high-quality PC versions and then stripping them down to work on the consoles.

In a recent article on Kotaku "Crytek moans about the current RAM of the X360 and PS3" right here: http://kotaku.com/#!5792848/of-course-crytek-wants-16-times-more-ram-in-the-next-console-generation

It's pretty ironic.

I like DICE's views in a recent interview with www.GeForce.com about Battlefield 3. Apparently, they are developing BF3 as a PC game first and foremost and then they will scale it down for the consoles.


Comment #5 by: the other guy on 16 Apr 2011, 17:26 UTC reply to this comment

this game is cool lol


Comment #6 by: kushgrind on 19 Apr 2011, 16:12 UTC reply to this comment

Why are you saying Rockstar ignores the PC when i can go on Steam and download every Rockstar game ever made on my PC. That doesnt make any sense? Advanced graphics options are only a download away. If you search Google you can find a Crysis 2 graphics modifying program made in visual basic by a guy on some forums, and your telling me Crysis with all its money cant * code out a simple program like that? *

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM