Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Microbiology/Genetics

August 21st, 2007, 18:06 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

Could Two Women Produce Their Own Baby?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Women already say that man is an appendix of the penis. As sex toys already replace the penis, only the sexual function remains. And when this will be gone, too, what will be men's fate?

If amongst vertebrates, only sharks and some lizards have been known to reproduce without requiring sperm for fertilization, a phenomenon called parthenogenesis ("virgin birth"), no mammal (thus species with a body structure like ours) is known to do this.

But now, a Japanese team has managed to bypass natural
barriers, generating apparently normal mice by mixing the DNA of two mouse eggs. They did this by reprogramming one of the eggs to act more like sperm.

Unfertilized mouse eggs can divide in the lab, but these embryos can't form a placenta and die soon, and a missing male element is thought to cause this. Each chromosome carries genes, specifically activated or deactivated in connection with their inheritance from the mother or the father. Both maternal and paternal activations are required for a mammalian fetus for a healthy development.

The Japanese researchers led by Tomohiro Kono at Tokyo University of Agriculture in Japan have revealed that once the imprinting issue is bypassed, two normal female mice could produce healthy embryos. 2 important DNA patches involved in paternal imprinting were found on chromosomes 7 and 12.

The team engineered mutant mice lacking the genes involved in the paternal imprinting, allowing the female genome to act like a male one. Immature eggs taken from newly born mutant mice were inserted into the nuclei of normal mouse ovules. With these in vitro "fertilized" eggs started division, forming hollow cell balls of cells called blastocysts, the team inserted them into the wombs of female mice. 27 "bimaternal" individuals survived to adulthood, with a success rate equalizing that of in vitro fertilized human embryos, being healthy and fertile.

"It's remarkable that one need only modify two small regions of the genome to make an egg genetically behave like a sperm. So could such a technique potentially enable two women to have a biological baby? Out of the question," said co-author Anne Ferguson-Smith, developmental geneticist of the University of Cambridge, U.K.

"One of the women would have to be a mutant to donate the necessary genetically altered oocyte. Still, the technology should give scientists a new tool for better understanding how parental imprinting works and just how sperm contributes to development," she said.

"Because the mutant oocytes were immature, it is likely that they retained some of the imprinting from the mutant mouse's father. That would confuse any attempts to pin down exactly which imprinted genes are truly crucial for normal development.", warned Davor Solter of the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology in Freiburg, Germany.
FILED UNDER:
embryo
sperm
egg
ovule

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

25,377 hits · 13 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Scientists Have Obtained Fertile Cloned Sperm!

Even from the Womb, Daddy Wants You Bigger, Mom Wants You Smaller

Hormonal Implants, the Contraception of the Future?

The First "Fibroblast" Cloned Rabbit

Baby Dino Fossil Explains How the Huge Beasts Grew

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Denequia on 15 Aug 2009, 06:24 UTC reply to this comment

me and girlfriend are interested in having kids.. do we have to go japan to get done?


Comment #2 by: Pop on 02 Feb 2010, 18:49 UTC reply to this comment

I feel as if researchers should go deeper into the research so that two women should be able to produce a child together...

Comment #2.1 by: L..LIL D on 03 May 2011, 22:20 GMT

My wife and I are MORE than willing to be apart participate of any potential experiment! (Besides death :)


Comment #3 by: jay on 25 Jun 2010, 18:26 UTC reply to this comment

me and my girlfriend want to have a baby, we dont wanna adopt we wanna have our own baby, so when can we be able to walk into a clinic and have this done? do we have to go to another country?


Comment #4 by: girlwhowantsakid on 19 Jan 2011, 03:39 UTC reply to this comment

i really hope that 2 girls can have there own baby soon with in the next 6 years bc i want to have a baby with my girlfriend by then i want our own


Comment #5 by: FishGirl on 14 Sep 2011, 16:21 UTC reply to this comment

I hope as well that it will soon be possible for 2 females to produce a baby genetically related to the both of them. I really hope that my girlfriend and I will be able to have our own child. The best part of the both of us... adoption just doesn't measure up...


Comment #6 by: curious on 06 Nov 2011, 18:04 UTC reply to this comment

i wish from all my heart that a method where two females can produce a baby together is found in the next 3 years . having traits from both the partners :) but what i cant figure out is that females have x chromosomes so there shoud be no problem producing a baby girl atleast !!?


Comment #7 by: Anonymus on 16 Nov 2011, 04:38 UTC reply to this comment

*sarcasm*
Oh this is just great! Now women are going to think men are "out-of-date"
*end sarcasm*


It never surprises me how far the LGBT community will go to fulfill their infamous liberal gay agenda. As a advocate of population control, I disagree with this kind of research. It's both immoral & degrading to men. And that alone can be dangerous to society.

Honestly, I have to say that this is scary. And I don't think it's right either. If research like this goes on, then there will be no men left on this planet. Leave the sperm & eggs alone goddammit!

Comment #7.1 by: Dr. McNinja on 12 Dec 2011, 05:57 GMT

Actually, I don't really see your point.
First of all, I don't see how it is degrading to men. you make it sound like if women could have children on their own, all women would suddenly become lesbians and men would not be needed at all anymore, which is just ridiculous in itself. I find your comment more offensive than the research actually, in that it seems that you think men are just walking reproductional organs, and only good for making babies. which is an equally, if not more disturbing thought.

Ultimately you say it's immoral, but strategically choose not to elaborate, which leads me to believe you don't even know what you mean, yourself, so in the meantime I will assume that you just don't like the idea of two women(or two men for that matter) raising a child and having the same rights as a couple made up of both sexes, thus ridding you of all credibility in my book. Especially since your typing that hypocritical "not natural" nonsense on a computer that runs on nuclear power. If you want to plead unnatural, then move out of your house, hunt for your own food, and make your own weapons for that hunt.

Finally, one more thing to say. I personally think that adoption is the better choice, for all couples, since the world is already swarming with parent-less children. But I also know there are people who desire nothing more than a biological child. And many of these are same sex couples. And there's nothing unnatural about that.

Comment #7.2 by: Amaranth on 10 Jan 2012, 20:49 GMT

Quote: "If research like this goes on, then there will be no men left on this planet."

News flash! The Y chromosome is disappearing! Even if we leave the sperm and egg cells alone as you suggest, there will be no men left on this planet.

I completely agree with Dr. McNinja on the other matters except for the tiny thing about adoption. Adoption is like (and I do not mean to sound offensive) buying a cat from an animal shelter. Millions of things can be wrong with the kid and you might have to return the child because it's simply not suited for your living environment. That's simply cruel. The world might be swarming with children that need adoption, but I really think adoption is somewhat of a last resort.


Comment #8 by: licie on 21 Nov 2011, 05:54 UTC reply to this comment

I really think that this should become possible. I would love to have a baby with my girlfriend and not need a sperm donor. Me and my girlfriend are up for any experiments. We really love each other and we both want a baby that is related to us both biologically.


Comment #9 by: helen hull uk on 29 Mar 2012, 11:44 UTC reply to this comment

think its amazing just what i was looking for now where do i find a way of doing this


Comment #10 by: rareitalian on 22 Apr 2012, 20:34 UTC reply to this comment

wow, i think it would pretty cool. just another way to create life and expand the population. I am a gay supporter, so I hope some day they crack this down. =]

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM