Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

February 11th, 2011, 12:02 GMT · By

Corporations Could Finance Mission to Mars

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


A trip to Mars could be made possible by corporate sponsors, NASA experts suggest
Enlarge picture
According to a new proposition by experts at NASA, corporate partners could help an upcoming mission to Mars by sponsoring the construction of a spacecraft and the training of a crew to go there.

A human mission to the Red Planet is one of the main goals in space exploration today, and the really interesting thing is that the problems preventing us from going there are strictly financial.

In other words, we have the desire, the will and the technology to embark on this groundbreaking trip, but no money to do it with. The cost of sending humans to Mars is estimated to be about $160 billion.

The American space agency could never hope to muster up this huge amount of money, so it proposes that corporate partners be put in the loop. If their plan materializes, then astronauts could descend on Mars from a spacecraft called Microsoft Explorer or Google Search Engine.

The exorbitant amount of money needed for exploring our neighboring planet also includes the costs associated with setting up a permanent colony there. Understandably, governments will never be able to get the type of resources they need to support such a plan, even if they decide to work together.

In the $160 billion price tag, NASA scientists included the spacecraft phase, tests associated with determining the medical health and psychological issues of a future crew, the creation of a Martian outpost, as well as the colonization of the planet, explains Joel Levine.

The expert holds an appointment as a senior research scientist at the NASA Langley Research Center. The facility plays a crucial role in approving the use of manned spacecraft outside Earth's atmosphere.

One possible avenue for getting the mission funds could be the licensing of toys, games, books, movies, clothing lines, and broadcasting rights. Selling land and potential mineral resources on Mars could also help generate the funds.

“The solution is marketing, merchandising, and corporate sponsorships, which is something NASA has never done before. It's a whole new economic plan for financing a journey to Mars and what will become the greatest adventure in the history of the human race,” Levine argues.

Additionally, the aerospace industry and manufacturing sector could receive a tremendous boost from such an endeavor. Over 10 years, the country could create up to 500,000 new jobs in the two industries, Space reports. 

“A mission to Mars would motivate millions of students to pursue careers in science and technology, thereby providing corporate America with a huge talent pool of tech-savvy young scientists,” explains Rudy Schild.

“Then there are the scientific and technological advances which would directly benefit the American people. Cell phones, GPS devices and satellite TV owe their existence to the space programs of the 1960s,” the expert adds.

“The technologies which might be invented in support of a human mission to Mars stagger the imagination,” concludes Schild, an expert at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA).

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

853 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Viking May Have Found Organic Molecules on Mars

NASA Reaches to General Public for Ideas

Antarctic Depths Reveal Surprising Inhabitant

Mars Express Images Craters in Arabia Terra

New Mars Rover Is Hugely Popular on the Web

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Eric on 11 Feb 2011, 20:36 UTC reply to this comment

"Selling land and potential mineral resources on Mars could also help generate the funds."

Seriously? We haven't even got there, and NASA is already willing to give parts of Mars to the very organizations that plunder the Earth's resources without even an afterthought on sustainability? I think we shouldn't be so quick to give corporations...well, anything.

Not that it really matters; corporations care about money and money only; I don't think many will see this as a financially justifiable project. It is true they'd get some good press, but billions of dollars is a big price tag.

Frankly, it is a bit sickening that NASA is so willing to team up with the forces that are, without a doubt, a force of pure greed, selfishness, and evil. Corporate America isn't the answer to all of our problems, unless our problems have to do with making money on the backs of sweatshop workers or stripping the planet of resources or dumping massive amounts of pollutants into the atmosphere...I am not saying that every ounce of what they do is purely bad, but their one and only concern is *always* and exclusively making money, whereas NASA should be concerned about science. Imagine the problems when NASA is trying to do something for science but the corporations decide they shouldn't because they are part owners. Really, this isn't a good idea.

The world's governments CAN afford this if they really wanted to; they certainly make more than corporations. Maybe now really isn't the time to go to Mars. I don't think we should go at any cost; I'd rather we postpone the mission until it is more affordable or when there's more political/governmental will rather than sell out and give corporations even more potential power, this time over NASA.

If I have to read about a Burger King space ship I won't be taking NASA very seriously.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM