Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Security > Incidents

January 5th, 2012, 08:00 GMT · By Eduard Kovacs

Computer Virus Forces Court to Give Convicted Murderer a Second Chance

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Stenograph
Enlarge picture
In times where every single task is based on computers, a virus could be more than enough to give a convict a second chance.

After being convicted of second degree murder, Randy Chaviano, a Florida man, wanted to appeal his conviction, but to the court’s surprise the legal records of the initial trial could not be found, Graham Cluley reports.

It turns out that a computer virus’ destructive actions now force the Third District Court of Appeal to grant Chaviano a new trial.

So how could this happen, you may wonder?

The court stenographer that recorded the proceedings at the trial copied all the data onto her computer which mysteriously got infected with an unknown virus that somehow deleted all the legal records.

The trial that took place in 2009 should have been recorded both on paper and on the stenograph’s internal memory, but since the stenographer, Terlesa Cowart, didn’t bring enough paper for the machine, at one point she was forced to record the details only on the device’s storage unit.

When the trial ended, Cowart copied the data to her PC and removed it from the stenograph. Without a backup copy you can imagine that it’s not hard for even a simple virus to corrupt files, making them useless.

While this may seem like a malicious plot set up by the convict’s hacker friends (assuming he has any), what we’re dealing with is more likely an unfortunate incident that’s not very difficult to prevent.

“It seems very sloppy to allow the only record of a trial's proceedings to be held on an individual's PC - it's like asking for trouble if it isn't at the very least held securely as a backup elsewhere,” Cluley reports.

“It's claimed that stenographers in Florida have been resisting moves to replace them with digital recorders. Goofs like the one made by Terlesa Cowart are not going to do anything to help their argument.”
FILED UNDER:
incident
virus
lawsuit


1,587 hits · 2 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


1 Million Webpages Infected by Lilupophilupop SQL Injection Attack

Half of Americans Give In to Scams If Prizes Are Promised

Fujitsu to Develop Cyber Weapon for Japanese Government

Scareware Migrates to Android Devices, Beware of Opera Virus Scanner

Security Experts Find Defective SMS Trojan

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Stephen on 05 Jan 2012, 08:24 UTC reply to this comment

Really a most curious case!


Comment #2 by: Eric on 05 Jan 2012, 20:31 UTC reply to this comment

Stenographers are useless when we have the technology to simply record the trial. They have no point except to inflate legal costs; taxpayers have to pay their salaries to sit and record a trial when a machine can do it more reliably and much cheaper, without the risk of mistakes like these. Stenographers are a waste of money.

Our society is very inefficient and burdened by old, pointless things that we keep around just because we fear change...

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM