Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

August 5th, 2011, 15:06 GMT · By

Comparisons Between Spektr-R and Hubble Have No Merit

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


This is the Russian Spektr-R telescope
Enlarge picture
Since the launch of the Russian Spektr-R radio telescope coincided with the retirement of the American space shuttle, numerous news outlets used this opportunity to publish articles arguing why the US space program is going downhill. Experts say that comparing the telescope to Hubble is useless.

The Hubble Space Telescope has been the flagship telescope at NASA since 1991. Nearly everyone has heard about it, even if only in passing. Its photos adorn every science manual from Asia to Africa and America, and its contributions to understanding the Universe are more than obvious to anyone.

But somehow the instrument made it inside comparison charts that media outlets put together in order to prove whatever point they were trying to make. Given the advanced specifications of the Spektr-R observatory, the two were automatically compared.

First and foremost, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched the Herschel Space Observatory in 2009. This is the most advanced orbital telescope ever built, and no one appeared to have a problem with it, or compare it to Hubble. Why? Because they are telescopes of different class.

However, the same restraint was not practiced when Spektr-R launched, on July 18. The event took place around the same time the space shuttle Atlantis returned from its STS-135 mission to the International Space Station (July 21).

Given that news editors were obsessed with the retirement of the orbiters, they began to make comparisons between NASA's future and policies and those of the Russian Federal Space Agency (RosCosmos), which finally managed to launch Spektr-R after a decade of delays.

Comparing a near-infrared/visible-light/ultraviolet telescope like Hubble to a radio astronomy observatory like the Russian spacecraft is out of place, since the two don't even compete in the same wavelength ranges, Universe Today reports.

The two observatory will produce/continue to produce very different results. While Hubble will continue its 21-year career, Spektr-R will be arrayed with Earth-based radio telescopes, and conduct studies at a scale that has never been achieved before.

At this point – other than Herschel – the James Webb Space Telescope is the only contender that could challenge Hubble's domination in space. However, the JWST is a NASA telescope as well.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,423 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


ESA Telescope Reveals Possible Origins of Life

RosCosmos Launches Massive Radio Telescope

New Insights into How Superclusters Assemble

ESO Telescope Sees Hydrogen Peroxide in Space

We Could Make Contact with Aliens in 20 Years

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Remigijus on 21 Jan 2012, 22:37 UTC reply to this comment

The author criticizes comparisons, yet he goes on to declare HST as the dominator of space? Get over it!, the HST has been in the spotlight for over two decades, can't you handle a little time out?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM