Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

April 9th, 2009, 07:42 GMT · By

Citizen Media Less Comprehensive than Established One

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


News blogs are very unlikely to allow users to post comments or share their ideas about news, the researchers say
Enlarge picture
A new research from the University of Missouri School of Journalism shows that traditional media still holds a better position than citizen journalism, in professionalism, comprehensiveness, as well as in broadcast and distribution technology.

Over the recent months, the deteriorating financial condition in which newspapers have found themselves has prompted a lot of comments on their faith, as well as on the gap they will leave behind. Some market analysts have been quick to point out that citizen media, as in independent news sites and agencies, as well as blogs, would rush in and fill the void, while at the same time providing news services of a decent quality.

“We found that legacy sites offered almost double the percent of news (89 percent) in comparison with citizen news sites (56 percent) and three times that of blogs (27 percent). The topic coverage on blogs and citizen new sites is generally narrow and the sourcing is light,” UMSJ faculty Chair in Strategic Communication Margaret Duffy explained.

“One of the biggest surprises we found was that mainstream media Web sites were almost as welcoming to citizen participation as citizen journalism sites, and they were far more welcoming than blogs. Many industry professionals hope that citizen sites will democratize news media, but that hope has yet to be realized,” Associate Dean for graduate studies Esther Thorson added.

A team of investigators, consisting of Thorson, Duffy, Michigan State University Professor Steve Lacy, and University of North Carolina Professor Dan Riffe, analyzed citizen media outlets in 47 American cities, and learned that, on average, each of the cities had only two or three citizen news sites. Of the discovered pages, about 66 percent were blogs and the rest were actual news sites.

Duffy shared that many of the sites that were discovered were in a “dormant state,” or hadn't been updated in a long time. She added that, while some independent news agencies were doing just fine, others were fighting for their very survival and faced bankruptcy just as much as newspapers did in the “real world.”

The study also revealed that citizen media websites often had links within their articles to traditional media outlets. The same was twice less likely to happen in the opposite direction, from established outlets to citizen media. In addition, blogs and other news sites were also very likely to have at least one link to an outside source in their articles, as opposed to the “competition,” which often made its own stories. The team also learned that few citizen news sites had policies for regulating comments, posts and other materials contributed by their users.


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,250 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Social Media Experiment to Get People Involved in the News

Scientists Say that Journalism Is Evolving

How Politicians Use Fear to Manipulate People

Taiwan Officials Blackmailed into Becoming Chinese Spies

New Code Can Detect Modifications in Media Files

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Internet Strategist on 12 Apr 2009, 00:29 UTC reply to this comment

One reason there may be fewer active citizen news blogs is that they have moved to micro-blogging sites such as Twitter. That may be what happened to those you found that are now dormant.

Most cities today only have ONE newspaper so two to three citizen news sources is an improvement. Some would see not censoring commentators to be a good thing - not a negative.

The researchers obviously do not read the blogs I frequent. Wise bloggers DO specialize in narrow niches and that is why they are useful to their readers. The best not only encourage comments, some reward them by using CommentLuv and KeywordLuv plugins. Some authors actually answer comments and discuss what they've written with the public.

Major media sites frequently have registration requirements that discourage interaction. Some do not even allow comments. How could anyone decide they were "far more welcoming than blogs"?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM