14 DAY TRIAL // Casey Anthony’s legal woes, stemming from the murder of her daughter Caylee, of which she was accused, are far from over but, if one woman has her way, the one the press dubbed “Tot Mom” will be facing even more of the same legal troubles.
A Pennsylvania woman is taking Anthony to court for the whopping amount of $3 billion (€2.3 billion), on claims that Casey threatened to kill her and, in the process, caused her terrible “emotional and mental stress,” Radar Online reports.
Because of the sum asked as compensation, the e-zine even goes as far as to label the lawsuit one of the “craziest” ever – and not just involving Casey Anthony either.
Judging by the claims the woman makes in official court documents, that statement isn’t far from the truth.
“Casey Anthony is an Illuminati actress who has used the summers 2009-2011 to mock and harass my current circumstances. Casey Anthony and Nancy Grace are working in cahoots with one another to fill the media with propaganda so that American Citizens believe there is Justice in this country,” the woman writes.
“Casey Anthony called my house August 2011 and told me that my life was being exploited and that I was a hated nation wife, she told me she would come to my house in Fort Collins, Colorado and kill me just as they did Peggy Hettrick in 1987. She let me know that my left eye would be stabbed out as a part of the Illuminati symbolism,” she adds.
The woman goes on to say that Anthony threatened her that the government would poison her water, so, as a consequence, she became afraid to drink tap water or even shower anymore “for months.”
There’s more where that came from too.
“She (Casey Anthony) told me that there were cameras lodged in the back of my eyes and that my life is a reality show for the Elite. Because of her, I suffer from severe psychological damage,” the woman writes.
“For months I couldn't use the bathroom to go number 1 or 2 without thinking there was some sick wealthy pervert watching me through cameras Casey Anthony claimed were lodged in the back of my eyes,” she claims.
The lawsuit has already been dismissed because “the fantastic allegations [in it] do not meet the plausibility standard,” the report further notes.