Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

January 15th, 2008, 11:15 GMT · By

Can You Build Applications that Swing to Both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows Vista
Enlarge picture
While Apple has already made the jump to exclusively 64-bit architectures with Mac OS X, Microsoft is lagging behind, and is still in the transition process from x86 to x64 with the Windows operating system. The reason why the Redmond company has shipped all the editions of Windows Vista in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions, as well as the reason why it will continue to do so with Windows 7, is related to the ecosystem of hardware and software products built around the platform, and that is currently focused on the x86 version of Windows.

One way for the Redmond company to smooth out the transition period, at least as far as software developers are concerned would be to provide a way for applications to come in a single package but permit the end user to install them on both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows. The first step in this regard would be the evolution of the Windows Installer in order to provide the possibility of a single package deploying 32-bit binaries on x86 Windows, as well as 32- and 64-bit binaries on x64 Windows. For the time being this is impossible.

"If you're actually trying to install 64-bit binaries to appropriate directories and write to the 64-bit view of the registry, the short answer is that you can't build a single package. Before delving into the details, let me clarify that both 32- and 64-bit binaries can be installed to either ProgramFilesFolder or ProgramFiles64Folder, but may not load correctly into a 64- or 32-bit process, respectively. The Windows Installer SDK, for example, installs all of x86, IA64, and x64 binaries under ProgramFilesFolder for link time support. But when you need to install files correctly, multiple packages are required because not all 64-bit features are lit up if the package isn't marked as a 64-bit package," explained Heath Stewart, Microsoft Software Design Engineer.

Essentially, architectures including Intel for x86, Intel64 for IA64, and x64 for x64 have to be distinctly listed in the Template summary property. There is simply no way around this. The Template summary property documentation actually restricts developers to a single platform, meaning that you will not be able to support both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista with a single installer package, as listing multiple platform values will cause them to be invalid.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,018 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Microsoft Makes Its Own: 32-bit Windows Vista vs. 64-bit Windows Vista

6 Caveats - 64-bit Windows Vista

Vista SP1 Won't Resolve the 4 GB RAM Limitation of 32-bit Windows Vista

Update Available to Bulletproof 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista Sidebar

Microsoft Kick-Starts the Process of Serving Vista SP1

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Chief Software Architect on 30 Jan 2008, 20:15 UTC reply to this comment

IMHO this is not a major issue.
Download and or launch either 32 or 64bit setup files - so what - if you want to install software you should know what you're doing anyway. On many download sites you've got to make decisions - stable/beta/older/free/trial... version.
32/64 in addition won't hurt 64 early adopters and I'm pretty sure MS will come up with solutions.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM