NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
Home / News / Science / Behavior/Humans

Behavior/Humans


Blood Controls Our Thinking

Blood flow controls brain's activity

By Stefan Anitei, Science Editor

18th of October 2007, 10:10 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
'Thinking with the heart' and 'hot blooded' can get a new real meaning now. Besides, ancient Greeks, like Aristotle, were convinced that the circulatory system dictates thoughts and emotions.

The new Hemo-Neural Hypothesis, brought forth by a team led by Christopher Moore, a principle investigator in the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT and an assistant professor in MIT's Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, states that blood is not just a food and oxygen supplier for neurons, but actually shapes the brain activity.

"We hypothesize that blood actively modulates
how neurons process information. Many lines of evidence suggest that blood does something more interesting than just delivering supplies. If it does modulate how neurons relay signals, that changes how we think the brain works." said Moore.

Punctual shifts in blood flow would model the activity of close neurons, changing the signals they pass to each other and tuning data flow throughout the brain. This affirmation is based on ongoing researches made in Moore's laboratory. This could change our knowledge on Alzheimer's, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis and epilepsy.

"Many neurological and psychiatric diseases have associated changes in the vasculature. Most people assume the symptoms of these diseases are a secondary consequence of damage to the neurons. But we propose that they may also be a causative factor in the disease process, and that insight suggests entirely new treatments." said Moore.

Epileptic people often display abnormal blood vessels in the brain area linked to seizures and the new hypothesis says that the abnormal flow could provoke epileptic attacks. Thus, chemicals targeting blood flow could come as an alternative to current cures.

The novel idea also changes the importance of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

"Scientists looking at fMRI currently regard blood flow and volume changes as a secondary process that only provides read-out of neural activity. If blood flow shapes neural activity and behavior, then fMRI is actually imaging a key contributor to information processing." said co-author Rosa Cao, a graduate student in Moore's lab.

Investigations led in Moore's lab match this supposition. fMRI researches made on the sensory homunculus (brain's map of body parts like fingers, toes and limbs) found that increased blood flows to the fingertip area made people perceive more rapidly a light tap on the finger.

The new hypothesis does not oppose prior knowledge. In fact, it fits perfectly and comes with a more detailed interpretation, enhancing fMRI's role.

The team tries to explain these effects on diffusible factors that could pass out of vessels, changing neural activity and blood volume changes could influence their levels. Neurons and support glia cells could also be affected by the mechanics of the expanding/contracting blood vessels. Blood flow also influences the brain's temperature, directly linked to neural activity.

TAGS:

blood | brain | neuron


Rating:
Good (3.1/5) 8 vote(s) so far    

Read by 2,256 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article
Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2008 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Are Sleepwalkers Real Killers?

How Is the Brain of the Anorexic Women Different?

New Technology Will Enable Your Computer to Read Your Mind

The Alien Head Condition

Mobile Phones Cause Brain Cancer

Why Do Professional Players Miss the Easy Shots?

Meditation Improves Attention and Reaction to Stress

10 Tips for a Better Memory

Human Brain and Sex

13 Reasons Why Chocolate Is Good for Your Health and Sexuality

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: neurogrrl on 09 Nov 2007, 01:12 GMT reply to this comment

In this article I see evidence for a correlation between perfusion and thinking, but not evidence for causality. Have I missed something?

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 






SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM