Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Games

October 16th, 2008, 08:16 GMT · By

Blizzard Won't Use DRM for Diablo III

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


No DRM issues for this game
Enlarge picture
DRM or Digital Rights Management systems are the things that protect games from piracy. They impose several restrictions on games, like how many computers you can install the same version on, or how many gamers can play the same copy of the game. Although most of the times they don't make their presence felt, there are a few programs that have gained a not so good reputation. 

Such is the case with SecuROM, which was packed with the hit game Spore by Electronic Arts. Its quite restrictive terms generated a big backlash, some people even suing the company, which made other gaming developers quite aware of this sensitive issue, with many of them saying that they would impose less restrictive systems, like Ubisoft did on their upcoming title Far Cry 2. 

Blizzard on the other hand, says that it probably won't employ any kind of protection on its upcoming RPG, or Role Playing Game, title Diablo III. Through the voice of its vice president Rob Pardo, the company expressed its intention to have an anti-piracy system more similar to Steam, the digital content distribution network created by Valve. In this context, Blizzard will be using its online multiplayer service Battle.Net.

"The thing that I think helps us, is that since our games have such a huge multiplayer component, Battle.net really is our most effective DRM. If you wanna play online on Battle.net with other players you’re going to have to have a legitimate copy. That’s really kinda been the thing that’s always saved us from a lot of the PC piracy that I think hurts a lot of other single-player-only games." said Pardo in an interview with Wired.

This is a great idea coming from Blizzard, which is surely going to attract a lot of people. The company already has a reputation for offering great multiplayer experiences, with the likes of the original Starcraft and Diablo games being played nowadays on Battle.Net, and let's not forget the hit MMORPG, or Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game, World of Warcraft, with over 11 million subscribers worldwide.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

10,642 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Starcraft II Singleplayer Campaigns Could Have Years Between Them

Diablo 3 Might Be Coming to Consoles

Meet the Wizard Class of Diablo III

BlizzCon Starts This Friday

Lead Designer Talks about Diablo 3

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Tijmen on 10 Mar 2010, 18:12 UTC reply to this comment

Good news! :D

And indeed, SP Diablo will only leave you wanting more co-op online gameplay. :P
This will propably make the game way more usable..


Comment #2 by: NovBer on 01 Jun 2011, 10:53 UTC reply to this comment

i`m a single player gamer only, so when i NEED internet activation they can go * themselfs, reckon 60 euro would grand a legal buyer al RIGHTS he/she deserve`s, and no severe restrictions from dev/produsers.
Wonder why such smart people (CANT be easy the make a game)do not realise THEIR criminal behavior drives honest gamers to the BEST product possible,why shoul i pay 60 euro for restrictions if i can have a working, faster,better game for free?!?!

AC2 for example demanded i bought a xbox (no regrats:MK,RDR) but it should not be needed,i do nothing illigal but fully understand and respect the `criminals`who do, so please dev`s use your common sense and save the best invention since the wheel and porteble fire,

sorry for my bad english, i`m Dutch

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM