Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

December 12th, 2008, 10:30 GMT · By

Before the Big Bang There Was Another Universe

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Big Bang as the link between two universes
Enlarge picture
A new challenge to classical cosmology comes from a novel field named loop quantum cosmology (LQC), which started from applying rules of loop quantum gravity on the context of general relativity. The new vision states that the universe we live in did not emerge from an infinitely small particle with a similarly infinite mass (the dreadful singularity all scientists have been trying to avoid). Instead, the authors claim that another (possibly similar) universe existed before.

The laws of physics to which singularity abides are still elusive, but theoretical aspects suggest that it is highly likely that Planck-scale densities are impossible. So, Martin Bojowald, an assistant professor of physics at Pennsylvania State University, and Abhay Ashtekar, Eberly professor of physics and director of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at the same institution, have devised a model where the universe is the result of another kind of Big Bang, called a Big Bounce.

 

In their vision, another universe existed before our own, but at some point, due to gravity, it started to contract and collapse upon itself, much like a dying star, but on a far greater scale. It is estimated that it had not reached the Planck density of 5.1 × 1096 kilograms per cubic meter, the rough equivalent of the mass of some trillion Suns squashed to the size of one atom (but it wasn't far, either), when an immense repulsive force occurred in the fabric of space-time, overcoming gravity. This caused the matter to expand all over again, in what is, perhaps, a cyclical process.

 

Although the cycles of inflation and deflation are not a new concept, the complicated theory (which involves superinflation and a particle called inflaton) is the first that fits in the large picture. The developers of the novel concept are striving to improve their theory by using the latest technology to search for patterns in the gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Whether a similar fate awaits our own universe is yet unknown, but some speculate that the effects of the dark energy that pushes the universe apart might reverse at some point, causing it to collapse and go through the same process all over again.


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

4,368 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Physics Nobel Prize Winners Involved in Symmetry Breaking

The Dark Matter Amount Is Perfect for Life

Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Now Dark Flow

An Eluding Big Bang Equation for Galaxy Formation

Space Dust Is Dark Matter

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: JTankers on 14 Dec 2008, 13:30 UTC reply to this comment

Recent analysis by Dr. Otto Roessler also finds that black holes are not infinitely dense, they only approach infinite density. It appears to follow that if a black hole becomes massive enough it might have the potential to explode.

Pre-big bang mechanics suggested at open-source physics site bigcrash.org also sound compelling (matter creation from virtual particles around black holes).


Comment #2 by: E. Griffith on 07 Jun 2009, 22:18 UTC reply to this comment

This is not a new idea. I learned about this theory in grade school in the 1970's.
Thisatrons and Thatatons can seem like deux ex machina, or just stand in names for either unknown particles, or particles with certain actions in unusual situations.


Comment #3 by: Gilbert Labour on 27 Jul 2009, 05:48 UTC reply to this comment

It is a soothing thought that the universe is not merely 16 billion years old but older and that the current universe was created in an infinite process of which 'our' Big Bang (or Big Bounce or whatever) is just one of such events that have occured in the last infinite number of years. The rocks (we only have moon and earth to compare) seem to indicate an age of < than 16 billion years for the current universe but of course the geological evidence which is available is but a fragment of the true picture whatever that turns out to be. I am glad that the prediction of Stephen Hawking that 'before the Big Bang was not within man's current understand to explain' is being challenged. I do have a problem understanding the density of trillions of suns compressed into one atom (or even less maybe - we are dealing with a new physics and perhaps need another Newtown to describe it for us) but then who doesn't. The other beauty of this research is that the forces that created the universe are cyclical. It makes death seem almost like a birth.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM