Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple > Personal Thoughts

January 28th, 2010, 12:35 GMT · By

Apple iPad - Drawbacks & Advantages

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The Apple iPad showcased in various stances
Enlarge picture
Ok, now that the word is out, let’s all just settle down and reflect a bit on what Apple has told us, and showed us about the new iPad. Most rumors about this thing have proven to be accurate. Why? Because this was the only obvious direction for Apple, if it really wanted to build the tablet. Sure, some of you wanted to see more from the iPad (Softpedia included), but we’re getting a good deal for that $499 price tag. Or so it seems.

· You get WiFi-only with the base model, yes. But, the Apple iPad isn’t really for geeks, is it now? Most people will be happy to get Internet access at home, via occasional hot spots here and there, the coffee shops and pubs they regularly go to, etc., so I don’t think Internet will be such a big problem for these people. And those who want the Internet at their fingertips all the time can just go for the more expensive models, get an unlimited data plan while they’re at it, and still spend less for more. Even though there’s still a good couple of months (maybe more) before we get to hold this thing in our hands, the iPad makes a lot of sense for all kinds of people, particularly for those who are not computer experts. And that’s Apple’s customer, right there. A monkey could use this thing!

(Seriously, does anyone have a monkey around, and would be willing to do some tests when this thing is out? Let us know. We’ll write about it.)

· Yes, Apple also ties the 3G model to a microSIM card that limits your choices for preferred carriers. AT&T is the only carrier confirmed to support the iPad in the US. The company is also one of the few that offers that pesky, tiny SIM card, which many people still wonder why it was even necessary to invent.

· Battery life. Apple says ten hours. Softpedia says, “Not likely” and, “Would you like to put your money where your mouth is?” That’s how sure we are the iPad will not live up to its name, from a battery life standpoint, just like the iPhone. Your regular iPhone user - who browses the web, downloads an app or two, sends emails and listens to music on their iPhone, every day - will tell you that he or she needs to recharge that baby once every 24 hours. Apple claims up to seven hours of video playback on the iPhone 3G, and ten hours on the 3GS. These figures don’t reflect our experience with any of the iPhones we’ve employed. Sure enough, graphics-intensive apps - like racing games, for instance - will drain the iPad’s lithium-polymer battery before you can even reach for the charger. Of course, this is one take on the matter, based on experience with other Apple portables. We truly hope we’re wrong here. On the other hand, the device really belongs in a bag, or on a tabletop, so it’s bound to either have a plug nearby, or always be close to its charger.

Shape, size and weight are likely winning features of the Apple iPad
Enlarge picture
· I don’t think we even need to go into the whole size-and-weight thing, not to mention the design. Apple has always done well from both these standpoints, and will surely continue to do so with every upgrade / new product to come. You don’t need to turn the iPad around to see the sleek Apple logo on that finely finished aluminum casing to know you’re looking at a product designed at One Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California.

· But there are more aspects that can be considered drawbacks. Here’s one: for the love of God, doesn’t Apple see the importance of multi-tasking on such a device? Also, no camera? Not even one? We get that video conferencing was too much to ask from a 500-dollar Apple portable, not to mention the difficulties AT&T is encountering with its 3G network, but there are some things that simply need to be part of a device like the iPad. And one of those things is a camera. If a webcam was too much to ask for, then the ability to take a picture with the thing, include it in one of those fancy Keynote slideshows and email it to your loved ones really sounds like a key feature Apple missed out on.

· According to those who’ve had a go with it (following the end of Steve Jobs’ keynote address yesterday), the device is extremely snappy. No surprise there - it’s powered by Apple’s own chip. That should translate into many years of flawless operability, but also limitations, so we’ve got a good and a bad inside the 1GHz A4 silicon. Perhaps there’s also some hope for that ten-hour battery life thanks to the A4.

· Oh, how could we forget about the screen? Is that thing gorgeous, or what? It sure makes the iPad look like the device to watch video on (in bed, drinking your morning coffee, etc.). The increased real estate clearly provides tons of benefits for any activity, including using some third-party apps like Brushes. When the iPad is out, Brushes will be there to complement that glossy 9.7-inch display, its developer has confirmed, and we bet there will be quite a few artists taking things to a whole-new level, thanks to the iPad.

· “iPad”...hmm. We think Apple could have done a little better here as well. Of course, with no better suggestions for a name, we’re not going to weigh in on this too much. We just thought the company had it in it to come up with something better than the obvious name “iPad.”

iPad does away with some apparently lacking features by connecting to various accessories
Enlarge picture
It connects to a lot of neat accessories, like the iPad Keyboard Dock, which only enhances the tablet experience, combining Multi-Touch with traditional controls - a dream come true, for many Apple fans. The accessory combines a dock for charging your iPad with a full-size keyboard. Featuring a rear 30-pin connector, it lets you connect to an electrical outlet using the USB Power Adapter, sync to your computer, and use other accessories like the Camera Connection Kit.

· The storage capacities are OK. 16GB, 32GB, or 64GB flash drive for $499, $599, and $699, respectively (WiFi-only models). However, 16 gigs may not be enough for regular use in the nearby future. Apps will get bigger, as developers try to take advantage of the increased number of pixels, video automatically gets bigger for the iPad as well, etc. Hopefully, this will not prove to be a drawback. So far, storage sounds good.

We could go on forever about the things we believe are good with the Apple iPad, and those that are not so good. Basically, the iPad seems to combine Apple’s best features with many of its restrictions. But we're going to save our energy for when it ships. In the meanwhile, why don’t you help us see what everyone thinks about this thing, what are the key points Apple has nailed, or failed to get right, and so on. Use the comments at will. With enough feedback from you, we'll be able to do another piece, based entirely on your comments.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

61,876 hits · 24 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Apple Introduces the iPad

Apple's 'Latest Creation' - Event Coverage

Apple Tablet Specs, Features Leaked by Actual Tester

Updated iPhone Developer Agreement Mentions New iPhone OS

New Photos of iTablet Leaked - Prototype

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Joshua on 28 Jan 2010, 13:38 UTC reply to this comment

After watching WWDC, the iPad didn't really appeal in the first half of the conference. It was basically an enlarged iPod or iPhone. However, the second half showed some interesting new things, such as the iBook Store, the new possible apps, and iWorks. I would say this iPad is indeed cutting edge technology at the moment and it is expected to have some drawbacks, but just like the iPhone, I'm expecting in the future for Apple to upgrade, add on, and give iPad more power (maybe a video cam will be installed later in the year or so). Additionally, I'm hoping that iPad will be able to carry computer programs such as those of, perhaps, Adobe. Observing the new user interface for iWorks on iPad, it would truly be remarkable to integrate those technologies into the Adobe softwares, like Photoshop (when erasing dust residue, the touch ability will really come in handy).

Comment #1.1 by: moomoo2 on 22 Jul 2011, 00:38 GMT

i got a puppy


Comment #2 by: Blooskyy on 28 Jan 2010, 13:38 UTC reply to this comment

This device has been created with one thing in mind, 'THEIR ONLINE SHOP' and driving as many people as they can to it. This is why they keep creating locked down devices with no other option but to use other than the apps from their store. This device and Steve's marketing spiel reminds me of a wolf in sheep's clothing.

I was really hoping that this would be more than a shopfront device and rather include a Finder and the ability to install other applications such as Photoshop etc. Now I realise this isn't the direction Apple want to head, for obvious reasons mentioned above. But from what I gathered from the keynote, this device is still as dependent on a standalone Mac/PC as a iPod Touch is. Without another computer you won't be able to add all those lovely photos or music tracks. From what I gather this device is partly marketed at people who don't want to own a full blown computer but they're stuck with one if they wish to add their content.

Not to mention no isight camera???

I'll be waiting to see what direction this takes when the next version is released. Maybe then they will get it right, but not likely as money talks.
In my opinion Apple have missed the boat unfortunately, and all due to greed.


Comment #3 by: Sin3Killer on 28 Jan 2010, 17:23 UTC reply to this comment

In regards to advantages and disadvantages is it know whether it is possible to connect external storage devices such as a HDD it an iPad? If so can this only be used to store things like or is it possible to run apps from the external device?


Comment #4 by: Waylo on 28 Jan 2010, 20:21 UTC reply to this comment

I wish it was more Macbook and less iPod Touch. With the fast processor and big screen real-estate, there is no excuse for no multitasking.


Comment #5 by: terry on 28 Jan 2010, 23:12 UTC reply to this comment

The true apple tablet was years ago released - Axiotron "Modbook" (http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook). So, what we saw - iPad - is just a shadow... Axiotron's modbook is a full fledged ... pre - 'Netbook era" touch-tablet. So, if you need an bigger ipod touch, just buy a non-multitasking, applestore - dependent ... gizmo. I'm very disappointed. I prefer a Macbook Pro or an iMac. This "thingy" will be bought only by Apple fans and maybe by other fashion/trend/metro lovers. The true Apple fans will ignore this "thing". Steve Jobs seems to loose his "touch", I prefer G4, G5, and newest Intel based products.


Comment #6 by: Evgen on 29 Jan 2010, 05:59 UTC reply to this comment

Could iPhone owners explain to me a few things:

1. Can you install third-party software on your toy? I mean legal stuff, not hacks?

2. The iPhone/iPad SDK is free to download. If you develop your own application,
should you place it on AppStore for other people to download and install? I mean
the AppStore is the only way to install soft on iPhone/iPad?

Comment #6.1 by: Filip Truta on 29 Jan 2010, 07:38 GMT

@ Evgen

Yes, Evgen, third party software is already present on the iPhone. In fact, most of the 140,000 apps sold via the App Store are what you and I call "third party software".

However, if you were wondering if there was a way to avoid sumbitting a new app to Apple (App Store), legally, there is not. That's why some iPhone owners decide to jailbreak their devices (a practice Softpedia does not condone). By using hacked iPhones, these people can get access to applications that haven't been reviewed and approved by Apple. I know jailbreaking sounds attractive at first, but there are some drawbacks tied to this, so it's better if you document yourself before taking any action.

And yes, either way, a developer would have to use the iPhone Software Development Kit (SDK) to develop an app for iPhone, iPod touch, and now iPad.

Bottom line. If you want an app on either of these devices (the legal way), iPhone SDK + App Store approval are the requirements.


Comment #7 by: Filip Truta on 29 Jan 2010, 07:30 UTC reply to this comment

@Sin3Killer

"In regards to advantages and disadvantages is it know whether it is possible to connect external storage devices such as a HDD it an iPad? If so can this only be used to store things like or is it possible to run apps from the external device?"

Unfortunately, there is little chance Apple will allow such third party hardware (hard drive, flash drive) to connect to the iPad. Even if the company does provide support for additional storage in the future, running applications from another volume is just not Apple's thing, when it comes to systems running the iPhone OS.

So, if you get the 16GB model when it's out, you'll most likely be stuck with that much storage. If you're considering buying the iPad, but don't think 16GB will be enough for your photos, music, books, and apps, better head over to Apple's web site and check out their offerings on the iPad.

http://www.apple.com/ipad/pricing/

For example, the 32GB WiFi-only model will retail for $599 ($100 above the price for the 16GB base model). The WiFi+3G version is set at $729. 64GB versions will also available at higher prices.

Hope this helps.


Comment #8 by: Maurice on 29 Jan 2010, 10:31 UTC reply to this comment

Nothing complained, but just dreaming to have an iPad with a multi-touch piano keyboard and one or two lines of staffs appeared above. I then could think and play and record my composition immediately in Starbucks or on my bed. Then load the piece to Garageband or other composing tools on a new i5 iMac for editing...

...Perhaps with the SDK, I should consider to make something like this myself...

Comment #8.1 by: Filip Truta on 29 Jan 2010, 10:56 GMT

@Maurice

No reason to be disappointed, Maurice. I am 100% positive one of the tens of thousands of developers out there will re-scale their music apps to fit the iPad's 9.7-inch screen. New such apps will emerge as well. Apple itself may well see the musical potential behind the iPad (in time) and release a stripped-down GarageBand for the device.

Just give it time. After all, the iPad not even out yet ;)


Comment #9 by: Chiplunkar G K on 29 Jan 2010, 11:38 UTC reply to this comment

Now that Apple has showed their product iPad, it is now for others to come up with the product / specifications that Apple has left out. In my opinion these are :

1. Expandable Memory, by providing memory card slot. Support 16 GB cards.
2. User replaceable battery. Socket to accept power from external source.
3. PC connectivity with USB port.
4. Possibility of connecting TV tuner.
5. Possibility of putting my own documents (PDF, Word, Spreadsheets) and read them on the go.

Comment #9.1 by: CHIPLUNKAR on 10 Aug 2010, 14:53 GMT

MR. G.K.CHIPLUNKAR
ARE YOU SAME PERSON WHO STUDIED AT COEP 1978-82 B.E.(MECH)
IF YES PL REPLY
...........SANJAY B. JOSHI


Comment #10 by: Rob on 29 Jan 2010, 22:17 UTC reply to this comment

humm...what to think you ask? again until it's my hands..touchy feely sensation...dont' really know. only comment I can make is it looks like a huge Iphone minus the phone.......so you are left with only "I"


Comment #11 by: Iphonefan on 30 Jan 2010, 20:49 UTC reply to this comment

Apple please read this! Hopefully u guys add this in the next updates or new releases!

1. Flash player! If my macbook can do it why cant the iPad?

2. iSight Camera! I want to ichat/skype/msn/yahoo chat with my frenz and families!

3. Multitasking! Please add this feature Steve! You want consumers to be happy? Add this feature for God's sake! I want to play Need for Speedwhile listening to my music! And while playing it, i can sms my fren and still continue with my game!!

Comment #11.1 by: Ash on 26 Apr 2010, 05:23 GMT

Good ol' Steve will charge you a neat thousand bucks for all that. dont worry there will be cool 'upgrades' in the near future to make you empty your pockets....LoL


Comment #12 by: ch.aamir on 15 Feb 2010, 19:37 UTC reply to this comment

i pad is the coolest technology of 2010


Comment #13 by: madteech on 25 Feb 2010, 23:41 UTC reply to this comment

Steve,
Our school is thinking of equipping our 2010-11 school year of middle schoolers with iPads. Do you think that they will support all that is needed to eliminate textbooks and begin our college prep curriculum right from the start? Will there be enough memory to sufficiently support all that today's middle school student needs to depend on only this device for covering all the subject areas?
Thanks,
M.A.D.


Comment #14 by: brian on 13 Jun 2010, 01:43 UTC reply to this comment

I tested it at JBHI , its ok i played PvZ (plants vs Zombies) altogether OK


Comment #15 by: your mom!! on 26 Oct 2010, 23:18 UTC reply to this comment

Since when do people ask Steve Jobs questions on Softpedia. I mean, really, u guys actually think Steve's gonna read this. lol:)


Comment #16 by: YYYY on 15 Nov 2010, 10:22 UTC reply to this comment

why dont you just get a iphone


Comment #17 by: dsm76 on 06 Mar 2011, 19:03 UTC reply to this comment

so true


Comment #18 by: buntttzzz on 22 Aug 2011, 04:33 UTC reply to this comment

i pad sucks

Comment #18.1 by: тлр on 05 Mar 2012, 15:08 GMT

I agree

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM