Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple

June 25th, 2008, 20:11 GMT · By

Apple Sued for Online Store 'Add-to-Cart' System

SHARE:

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Clear With Computers (CWC), a Texas-based company, has filed a patent suit against Apple and HP alleging that they are infringing its 1994 patent related to a system that says customers can sign in electronically and "build a list of products or parts from a form." The patent also includes the provider's ability to update the product list from time to time.

Sounds like just another company that felt a small boost of image was in order.

"The Electronic Proposal Preparation System patent and the Computer-Assisted Parts Sales Method patent were issued to CWC in 1997 and 1994, respectively, for computer-based techniques to propose and complete the sale of multiple parts in a single order," CBR Online reveals. Yes, this company is crying that Apple and HP have "stolen" its add-to-cart method of selling things proposed more than a decade ago.

First of all, Apple and HP aren't the only ones (ebay and Amazon are the kings of add-to-cart). Second of all, isn't this just standard issue e-commerce?! Come on people, enough with the stupid patents! At the rate things are evolving (involving, really) Neanderthals could claim infringement on catching a fish with your bare hands.

As explained in court documents filed in the Texas Eastern court this week, the case alleges HP and Apple infringe the CWC-held United States Patent No. 5,615,342, entitled "Electronic Proposal Preparation System." The patent was issued on March 25, 1997. The US Patent No. 5,367,627, "Computer-Assisted Parts Sales Method" was issued on November 22, 1994.

Ever notice how these patents tend to be so ambiguous that you don't even make the difference between a universal recipe for things and a discovery, or an invention? Don't get me wrong, we're not taking any sides here. For all we know, Apple and HP really could infringe CWC's patent by as little as using two words together the same way CWC did back in 1994. But whoever holds the truth, ambiguous patents such as this one should be banned... or patented.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,954 hits · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Sydney Apple Store Grand Opening this Week

Did You Know: Carl Sagan Fought Apple

New Sleeves for a New iPhone

New 3G iPhone Pics Surface - Front Camera Not Placed Right

$500 iMac Rival on Track for September Release

READER COMMENTS:



No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion!
Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM