NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Internet Explorer

Internet Explorer


Apple's Safari Finds Windows Vista an Unfertile Soil

Just as Windows XP

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

7th of August 2007, 08:50 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Apple's Safari 3 transitioned onto the Windows platform is going nowhere fast. Praised as an epitome of performance, design, style, security and usability, Safari 3, migrated to the alien Windows operating system for the sake of the iPhone, found that both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows XP and Windows Vista are nothing but unfertile soil. Perhaps because the Safari engine is powering iTunes for Windows, Apple was expecting nothing short of the same adoption rate for the browser.

"We think
Windows users are going to be really impressed when they see how fast and intuitive web browsing can be with Safari," stated Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO on June 11, celebrating Safari's move to Windows. "Hundreds of millions of Windows users already use iTunes, and we look forward to turning them on to Safari's superior browsing experience too."

But Windows users saw right through Jobs, and discerned through the propaganda and marketing promises. And the "fastest" browser for both PCs and Macs, is slow in its uptake. This despite a lightening start, with over 1 million downloads in just the first 48 hours. But outside of its limited exposure in the limelight, Safari for Windows faded into the background of anonymous browsers for the Microsoft platform. At the end of its first two months on the market, according to statistics from Market Share by Net Applications, Safari only managed to capture a share of 0.41%.

Of course that the browser is still a product in testing stage. Apple promised to make the final version available concomitantly with the final release of Mac OS X 10.5. In the meantime, Windows users can get a taste of the Leopard operating system on XP and Vista. But it's not an experience designed to take you away from Internet Explorer, Mozilla and Opera. Safari is built for the Mac OS X, and it shows. Neither Windows Vista nor Windows XP do it justice. By comparison, in just the first month of availability IE7 jumped from a share of 3.18% to no less than 8.84%. Mozilla's Firefox 2.0 grew from 0.69% to 3.61%. At the end of July, IE7 accounted for a share of 33.15% while Firefox 2.0 owned 12.38% of the market.

TAGS:

Safari 3 | IE7 | Firefox 2.0


Rating:
Fair (2.8/5) 5 vote(s) so far    

Read by 880 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article
Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2008 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Firefox 3.0 Delayed, Neither Firefox Nor IE Will Put Up a Fight to Safari

IE7, Firefox 2.0 and Safari 3.0 Share Security Vulnerability on Windows Vista

It's as if Firefox and Safari Didn't Even Exist, When Contrasted to Internet Explorer

Firefox Users Deserting to Safari, IE Still Top Dog

IE7 Up! Firefox 2.0 Up! Safari 3 Up!

Want Security? Move to Vista - Apple Patches Flood of Vulnerabilities in Mac OS

iPhone Display Runs Windows XP. Need I Say More?

Mozilla Slaps Apple with New Firefox 3.0 Alpha 7

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: biill on 07 Aug 2007, 18:21 GMT reply to this comment

I like it tho' it doesn't seem to support Windows Clear Type on my Dell laptop. Small type is fuzzy. Is this a Display Postscript issue?
I use it regularly, and like the look, so it's a win for me. If there are problems with it I'm not seeing any.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 






SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM