Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

December 27th, 2011, 13:26 GMT · By

Aliens May Have Left Artifacts on the Moon or Mars

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The Moon and Mars may hold signs of past alien incursions in our solar system
Enlarge picture
Experts from Arizona and Pennsylvania propose that the Moon and Mars may represent excellent places to start searching for alien artifacts. These objects may have been left behind by space probes or other spacecraft that may have visited our solar system a long time ago.

Both these celestial bodies have surfaces that could easily preserve any type of wrecked spacecraft for millions of years, without damage. As such, searching for such remnants could prove to be the best possible way to go about trying to find evidence of alien life.

This avenue of research could also benefit experts with the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute, in California. Traditionally, the organization has been focused on scanning the sky for radio beams transmitted from obviously-artificial sources.

Even those involved with the search know that it's a long shot, and apparent waste of resources. However, if SETI were successful, then the implications of this would be massive. A shift in the paradigm it is currently operating under could increase its chances of actually finding something.

Physicists Paul Davies and Robert Wagner, both at the Arizona State University (ASU), and colleagues at the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) propose searching the Moon and Mars, respectively, for physical signs of alien presence.

The assumption is that any extraterrestrial race capable of spaceflight would have surely sent probes throughout the galaxy. One of them may have crashed on the Moon, or Mars. If that is true, then the wrecks should still be there.

Atmospheric conditions on both these celestial bodies are extremely well-suited for preserving things for prolonged periods of time. The problem now is how to find any such potential signs. We would literally have to comb every square foot of both the Mars and the Moon to find anything.

Things are simpler when it comes to the Moon, since the NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft is capable of snapping images at a resolution level of about 0.5 meters per pixel. This provides an exquisite opportunity for researchers to look for anything out of the ordinary.

In excess of 340,000 LRO images have already been made available to the general public. “From these numbers, it is obvious that a manual search by a small team is hopeless,” the ASU researchers explain, quoted by Daily Galaxy.

“Extraterrestrial artifacts may exist in the solar system without our knowledge simply because we have not yet searched sufficiently. Few if any of the attempts would be capable of detecting a 1 to 10 meter (3 to 33 foot) probe,” scientists Jacob Haqq-Misra and Ravi Kumar Kopparapu explain.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,949 hits · 9 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


The Search for Extraterrestrial Artifacts Heats Up

White House Denies Establishing Contact with E.T.

Looking for City Lights May Reveal Alien Worlds

Alien Environment Analogs Can Be Found on Earth

Kepler Will Supply Even More Exoplanetary Candidates

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Ana on 27 Dec 2011, 15:51 UTC reply to this comment

S-ar putea sa avem surpriza sa descoperim urmele stramosilor nostri pe Marte; care, dupa ce au distrus planeta (asa cum sintem pe cale sa o facem cu Pamintul), s-au "refugiat" pe Pamint pentru a-si salva vietile. Cu siguranta ca ar fi fost mai avansati tehnologic decit noi acum care, iata, degeneram. Nu inteleg de ce savantii se gindesc tot la prabusiri si nu la eventuale constructii. Luna ar fi putut fi ca o statie de transfer/odihna/carantina pe timpul calatoriilor. Dar, succes cautatorilor!

Comment #1.1 by: Tudor Vieru on 28 Dec 2011, 10:19 GMT

E si asta o idee. Sunt multe structuri pe Pamant care preced cea mai veche civilizatie, adica cea sumeriana, si care nu pot fi explicate. Multa lume s-a gandit la teoria asta, dar e greu sa gasesti dovezi concludente in sensul asta.


Comment #2 by: ArkData on 27 Dec 2011, 17:09 UTC reply to this comment

What a gigantic waste of money. Life exists only on earth. The Bible says: "Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living." (Genesis 3:20). That's 'all' the living.

Comment #2.1 by: Nick on 28 Dec 2011, 08:25 GMT

Please pinpoint the exact location of Garden of Eden. You cannot, can you? What makes you believe this is on Earth?

Comment #2.2 by: Tudor Vieru on 28 Dec 2011, 10:20 GMT

And this is why, were we to stick with the Bible and religion, we would have lived in the Dark Ages even now.

Comment #2.3 by: Eric on 28 Dec 2011, 21:37 GMT

How arrogant and selfish...if you actually knew the scale of the universe, you'd realize how silly this assertion truly is. The idea that god picked our planet and only our planet in our little solar system in our galaxy among all the galaxies and the billions of stars is simply insane.

As for the location of the Garden of Eden, the Bible indicates that it was located between the Tigris and Euphrades rivers, so likely somewhere in modern Iraq. The Bible also talks about giants being born when angels mated with humans, so it isn't exactly an accurate book...but many Christians don't really even know the Bible that well, because they've only had it explained to them by pastors that, similarly, lack the analytic skills to understand the text, so I doubt this poster really even knows what he is talking about...but that won't stop them from passing judgement, certainly...

As it stands now, we know of no way to cross the vast distances of space in any reasonable time period, nor have we found any nearby planets able to support life. It certainly doesn't mean these artifacts do not exist...but there's no evidence for them, either.

It does seem unlikely, though, that some race many many light years away would be able to detect us and send a probe that would be able to reach us in any reasonable amount of time...possible, sure, but it still seems unlikely.

Comment #2.4 by: ArkData on 29 Dec 2011, 15:37 GMT

Reply to Nick (#2.1): Most likely the Garden of Eden was destroyed by the global flood of Noah's time. The scriptures say several times in Genesis 6-9 that God 'destroyed' the earth [things on the surface] along with all the living (except for those on the ark).

Reply to Tudor Vieru (#2.2): Judo-Christian scientists have lead the way in advancing science and technology. Newton wrote more about the Bible than about math or science. And there are many other: Kepler, Maxwell, Leibnitz, Pasteur ... It is evolutionist that have restricted science. The so called 'theory of evolution' is the biggest hoax to hit the planet.

Reply to Eric (#2.3): I have an Electrical Engineering degree, I understand the 'estimated' scale of size (14-17bly) of the universe. The size of the universe just shows how great our God is: "The heavens declare the glory of God". The present day Tigris and Euphrates rivers are not the same rivers mention early in Genesis, as I said in reply to Nick, those rivers were destroyed in the great flood. The rivers now called the Tigris and Euphrates have been given the same names, just like we have named New York, after York in England, or Athens GA after Athens in Greece. As you have said, for sure the universe is so big, we will never be able to travel far from our planet.

"When you read or hear anything about the birth of the universe, someone is making it up." Leon M. Lederman, Nobel prize for physics, 1988

Comment #2.5 by: Eric on 03 Jan 2012, 20:55 GMT

Having a degree in anything does not make you smart, and does not make your claims reasonable or rational. The fact that some scientists in our history have been Christian means nothing; Christians are capable of conducting science like anyone else, it is only their claims of god that do not hold scientific water; their religion doesn't matter when the science they are known for is secular.

Understanding the scale of the universe and still insisting as a matter of fact that this god you can't prove exists created us and only us seems like the claims of a child, not the claims of an educated man.

I should also note that the story of the ark is physically impossible for a whole host of reasons, not least of all the loss of every species of coral and plant that would be caused by a global flood...and the impossibility of surviving in a world of dust after such an event...but that isn't even relevant to the point at hand which is your insistence that aliens cannot exist because of god.

But then I'm wasting my breath, because anyone that turns to the Bible for answers about Science is living in a whole different reality...


Comment #3 by: Nate on 13 Feb 2012, 12:33 UTC reply to this comment

Good luck with that.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM