Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

February 22nd, 2012, 17:51 GMT · By

Adobe Drops Flash for Linux Except in Google Chrome

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Adobe won't support Flash Player beyond 11.2 on Linux
Enlarge picture
Adobe is not done killing off the Flash Player. It announced that it would be dropping mobile efforts last year and now it's revealing that it will no longer be providing a Flash Player download for Linux.

The only way to get Flash on Linux beyond the upcoming Flash Player 11.2 is to use Google Chrome, which will continue to come bundled with future versions of Flash Player. Flash Player 11.2 will be updated with security patches for five years on Linux.

Linux users won't be very happy about this as it means that Flash won't be supported on their favorite operating system on Firefox or any other browser than Chrome.

There is one slight possibility that there is a future for Flash on Linux, a Pepper-based version of the plugin for other browser. But Mozilla said it has no plans to support the alternative plugin API dubbed PPAPI that Google has been working on.

What's more, Adobe has said that there will be no downloadable versions of Flash Player for Linux.

PPAPI is still labeled as experimental and Google has, so far, only based some internal Chrome plugins on it, such as the built-in PDF Viewer.

One of Pepper's big advantages is that plugins have to be less customized for different operating systems. This is why Adobe will able to offer a Pepper version of Flash for Linux, it is virtually identical to the one for Windows and Mac OS X.

"The PPAPI, code-named “Pepper” aims to provide a layer between the plugin and browser that abstracts away differences between browser and operating system implementations," Adobe explained.

"Because of this work, Adobe has been able to partner with Google in providing a 'Pepper' implementation of Flash Player for all x86/64 platforms supported by the Google Chrome browser. Google will begin distributing this new Pepper-based Flash Player as part of Chrome on all platforms, including Linux, later this year," it added.


5,691 hits · 6 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Adobe Flash Player 11.2 Beta 4 Brings Hardware Acceleration to More People

Google Open Sources Video Player App for the Chrome Web Store

YouTube Crashing Chrome Issue Highlights Deeper Problems

Adobe Debuts Secure Sandboxed Flash Player for Firefox

Chromebooks Get Chrome 18 Update, Chrome 19 Not Available Yet

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: The People on 31 May 2012, 04:57 UTC reply to this comment

Honestly, Adobe. * You.

Comment #1.1 by: The person on 14 Sep 2012, 07:05 GMT

Dear Adobe. Your bedside relationship with Microsoft is really pissing the world off. And because Mac dropped you out of Ios you decided to punish Linux user?!!! Shame on you. Corporate chronie- ism at it's finest right there.

Comment #1.2 by: Linux_user on 21 Nov 2012, 14:37 GMT

I believe it's obvious that the reason Adobe is doing this is because they are "in bed" with Microsoft. They will do anything they can to try to steer people away from Linux, back to Windows, so they don't lose any more money. It's all about corporate greed. Just look at the reasons why Microsoft keeps changing their OS to a version that is more hardware dependent. They don't want you to use a computer that is over 4 years old because they want to force you to buy a new one every couple of years, bundled with their latest version of Windows. Later versions of Windows simply cannot be run on older systems due to the higher hardware requirements. Linux, on the other hand, runs very well on older systems, even better on newer systems, has virtually no virus or spyware, and best of all is completely free of charge! Couple that with the fact that newer Linux distros such as Ubuntu and Linux Mint are much more user friendly now than the older versions were...in fact equally as user friendly as Windows and Mac OS X. At least Apple allows you to update your OS to the latest version without buying completely new hardware!


Comment #2 by: brant on 26 Aug 2012, 03:01 UTC reply to this comment

I'd love for the Flash source code to be opened up to the public. Flash has a poor security track record, mostly because of its closed-source model. It's not like I'm asking for Photoshop to be reasonably priced or anything!


Comment #3 by: teejay on 15 Sep 2012, 11:14 UTC reply to this comment

Not really bothered to be honest. I use Chrome anyway but I do think Adobe are cutting off their nose to spite their face. The more they * people off, the less people will use their products. However big they think they are, the consumer always wins this sort of battle.


Comment #4 by: Githlar on 29 Sep 2012, 01:45 UTC reply to this comment

PAPPI sounds interesting, I'll have to look into that. But, no matter how you spin it, not having Flash support in Linux will have a crippling * . While I'm not sure if Chromium will have the same bundled Flash package (it tries to strip out all of the proprietary stuff), Firefox is still the browser-of-choice for most Linux distributions. That is, the majority of major distributions have it installed as the default. If Chromium doesn't have the bundled Flash plugin, then there will be some hard days ahead for those that are FOSS to the core. Couple that with the fact that they've dropped Reader from the platform as well and we're in for dire days ahead.

I am an avid supporter and promoter of Linux to anybody who will listen. I'm also tell people how much greater it is than the Windows that they're used to. Couple that with the fact that no modern viruses target the system and it's a win-win.

That said, Adobe has monopolized web media. Photoshop is the de-facto standard for image production, Flash for animations/games/interactivity (though I'd like to see some HTML5 canvas game libraries show up), Premiere/After Effects for video, etc. If the products of the tools of choice for most media creators are not available to Linux end users, then why would anybody want to switch over?

It's truly a crippling * . If Linux can not bring users all the content they are used to receiving, then it seems crippled to anybody looking to switch over.

Let's hope this PAPPI thing catches on.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM