Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

VIDEO

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX Doesn’t Rise to Expectations

- 12-inches long and still not good enough?

By: Dan Frincu, Hardware Editor

It’s time for ATI to put their money where their mouth is, because there have been just too many, rogue testing going on with their "still unreleased, under NDA" graphics cards. I realize that these are just engineering
samples, whose features and performances don’t reflect the ones of the finished product, but so far, all of the products I’ve seen that were engineering samples behaved a lot better than the final product.

In this case it means that what we have seen so far is the best of what these cards could offer, but then again I could stand corrected. This being said, I pity AMD for dragging along ATI into this because it seems that both of these companies’ misfortunes have joined forces and created a big hurricane of problems that is swiping everything in its path, draining their money as it moves along.

It seems the guys over at Anandtech.com have gotten their hands on the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX and tested it, after finishing up with the tests on ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT some time ago. This new series of tests went on to prove that NVIDIA’s 8800GTX overpowered the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX, in some cases too badly to mention. But I will give out some of the numbers the cards scored, in HL2 Episode One, 8800GTX got 157.1FPS, while 2900 XTX got 117.9FPS at 1280x1024. Even when the resolution got pushed up to 1920x1200, in Company of Heroes 8800GTX got 80FPS while 2900 XTX got 53.2FPS.

These numbers could be taken and broken into little arguments such as "the drivers were to blame", "the cards were engineering samples" a.s.o., but the biggest argument I could bring at the present time is that the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX has a problem right now, which I’ve discussed about a while ago. As more and more benchmarks appear on the Internet, it’s hard to convince even the most hardcore enthusiasts that these graphics card will have that extra edge, not to mention normal users. So marketing genies should click their heels three times and wish their way out of this one, because it seems praying is all they’ve got left.

MORE RELATED ARTICLES: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX Is Worse than 2900 XT AMD Athlon to Get Renamed ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT Benchmarks Agena Goes for 128 FPU While R600 Does 102.4GB/s NVIDIA Drops 8800GS, Adds G98 ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Uses GDDR4 AMD R600 Has 320 Stream Processors
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


26th April 2007, 13:06 GMT | Copyright (c) 2007 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 2,712 user(s) | Rating: | 5 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX Doesn’t Rise to Expectations - USER OPINIONS




We are sorry, there are no opinions available for this article.






SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX Doesn’t Rise to Expectations

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive