Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > CPU

May 16th, 2012, 22:31 GMT · By

AMD Trinity Trounces Ivy Bridge in Diablo III

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Diablo III Art
Enlarge picture
As most experts said before, AMD seems to be winning the Fusion bet. We were able to write about some of AMD’s achievements last year, and we have another win to report today.

Llano and Brazos already conquered 43% of the desktop market, although AMD doesn’t have a superior x86 CPU in any price range.

The ultrathin / ultralight / ultrabook bet seems to be also leaning towards the green side.

When it comes to Diablo III and when we mention that its predecessor was, and still is, one of the most popular games of the last decade, the question of what new CPU runs the game better naturally pops up.

There are many Diablo II players out there that did not really see any reason to upgrade their systems for the work they were doing, nor for browsing or music and movie playback.

When given the opportunity and reason to upgrade, what would be the most advantageous solution, Trinity or Ivy Bridge? Well, if Diablo III is the tool to measure the two CPUs, Intel’s Ivy Bridge comes over 40% behind today’s winner, AMD’s Trinity.

The hardware experts from legitreview.com have managed to test an Intel Ivy Bridge based laptop against AMD’s reference Trinity mobile platform.

AMD Trinity vs Intel Ivy Bridge in Diablo III
Enlarge picture
When running the game in FullHD, Trinity achieves 48% better scores in Blizzard’s new game.

Lowering the resolution to 1280 x 720, the lineup doesn’t change: AMD’s Trinity is still 40% faster than Ivy Bridge, despite the much more modest x86 performance.

The second most important fact of this test was that not only does AMD offer much better performance despite the “older” 32 nm technology and the x86 handicap, but the fact that the game is practically unplayable with Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

Managing only 17 FPS, Intel’s Ivy Bridge is clearly not acceptable for FullHD high-quality Diablo III gameplay.

When comparing the price, we’ll only mention that the Core i7-3920XM tested against AMD’s platform is an Extreme Edition Intel CPU that works at 2900 MHz default frequency.

It can clock up to 3800 GHz when only one thread requires maximum performance, it has a huge 8 MB level 3 cache and a 55 watts TDP and yes, it is extremely expensive.

At 1,096 USD, it costs more than Nvidia’s GTX 690 dual GPU card, and this is the price for the mobile CPU alone, not the whole laptop.

If getting out the best CPU / APU for Diablo III was a bet, AMD has clearly won this one.


5,867 hits · 7 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


WD’s Hitachi GST Launches the CinemaStar Z5K500 Slim 2.5” HDD

Fusion-io Amazingly Turns MLC into SLC

Hard Hit by the Fake HDD Crisis, WD Buys TOSHIBA’s HDD Plant in Thailand

CellCare Technology Enables 1,300% Durability on MLC SSDs

HDD Market Status 2012 – Part 2: More Hybrid Drives Coming

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Tobiman on 17 May 2012, 05:13 UTC reply to this comment

That's a big win for AMD. It's about time.


Comment #2 by: dew111 on 17 May 2012, 17:42 UTC reply to this comment

Uhh, I think you mean 8 MB level 2 cache


Comment #3 by: Constantin Murariu on 18 May 2012, 08:29 UTC reply to this comment

Intel's i7-3920XM comes with 4 x 256 KB of L2 Cache and 8 MB of L3 Cache. So I believe I'm correct when stating that Intel's counterpart has 8 MB or Level 3 Cache.


Comment #4 by: Angel_Lily on 20 May 2012, 02:27 UTC reply to this comment

intel still with its architecture the graphics switching while amd has made a new architecture which combine the graphics. low prices for performance is all everyone needs not for more prices for more performance. way to go amd! rocks on for gamers!


Comment #5 by: DavidS on 24 May 2012, 05:52 UTC reply to this comment

Yes AMD has made a great chip the problem now is people dont seem to understand that GPUs dont just work on games thay can be used for a myriad of other programs as well the problem with that is the application has to be made to take advantage of the GPU


Comment #6 by: Doughboy(^_^) on 31 Jul 2012, 22:24 UTC reply to this comment

Typical AMD Fanboi responses. This is one single game, and you're not buying a laptop to play one game. If you look at more benchmarks, such as that done by AnandTech, you will see that they're pretty close to even overall, it's just that Trinity has a few select games that it excels at (Ivy Bridge also has a few games it excels at, such as Batman: Arkham City, but you definitely won't buy a computer just to play that one).

Comment #6.1 by: pdamdrcks on 21 Sep 2012, 21:37 GMT

The bench marks are just synthetic. Look at any day to day or any CPU intensive tasks, there would be no noticeable difference between the two(may be in pico or femto seconds) Just look at the value you get for your money. That is what matters. Picking an AMD would put your hard earned money to good use.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM