Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > CPU

November 29th, 2011, 08:22 GMT · By

[UPDATE]AMD Not Competing with Intel Anymore, Goes Mobile

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

AMD stops competing with Intel
Enlarge picture
In a move that could very well be interpreted as exchanging one problem for another, Advanced Micro Devices has decided to stop focusing so much on the PC business and get its act closer together on the mobile front.

The Bulldozer disaster, as it is known in some circles, must have persuaded AMD's leadership that the PC side of their business wasn't flying very well and far anymore.

Though everyone was expecting much from 8-core processors, the performance was, in the end, well lower than some of AMD's own previous-generation chips.

Whether because of this or something else, it was reported that Advanced Micro Devices has chosen to distance itself from its competition with Intel.

That is to say, it will focus less on processors for PCs and pay more attention to the mobile market.

As such, it will probably start to customize its Fusion platform in such a way as to create tablet and smartphone chips.

"We're at an inflection point," said AMD spokesman Mike Silverman, according to a Mercury News report. "We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mindset, because it won't be about that anymore."

If anything, 2011, with more than half a year of lacking an actual CEO, was a clear symptom that Advanced Micro Devices had to do something, and soon.

The company has a new leader now and, sure enough, the man took some fairly drastic measures, and that includes more than this latest change in direction, as well as a branded RAM project.

The workforce also suffered, especially the PR and marketing departments (AMD axed large portions of each as part of its plan to cut total worldwide employee count by 10%).

The complicated thing about the focus on mobile is that ARM already has that well enough in hand, and NVIDIA just launched the Kal-El too. AMD may just be exchanging one headache for another with this.

UPDATE November 30, 2011: AMD said it remained committed to x86, but that doesn't technically invalidate the above. Read more here.

FILED UNDER:
AMD
CPU
mobile
tablet
smartphone


62,947 hits · 25 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


AMD 28nm Radeon HD 7000 GPUs to Be Announced on December 5 - Report

28nm NVIDIA Kepler GPUs Have Support for DirectX 11.1

AMD RAM Exists Now, Patriot Memory and VisionTek Make It

28nm NVIDIA GPU Roadmap Revealed

No More Samsung Netbooks from 2012 Onwards

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Darek on 29 Nov 2011, 08:58 UTC reply to this comment

worst news of the year , no more competition for intel of any kind.....

Comment #1.1 by: Maui on 29 Nov 2011, 17:11 GMT

Keep your ideology aside and think how can make money here. Intel now gets a free pass to improve thier ASP and their EPS. Time to buy INTC?


Comment #2 by: Nate on 29 Nov 2011, 09:41 UTC reply to this comment

This sounds like the kind of shift in direction that could put them out of business in the long run.


Comment #3 by: :D on 29 Nov 2011, 11:51 UTC reply to this comment

http://amdisfinished.com/


Comment #4 by: GettCouped on 29 Nov 2011, 12:49 UTC reply to this comment

The fusion chips have been very successful for AMD. This may be the right move, even though it makes me sad. Maybe it's a sign of and AMD ARM collaboration.


Comment #5 by: anonymous on 29 Nov 2011, 15:06 UTC reply to this comment

Terrible news, Intel now has a monopoly..


Comment #6 by: Dr. Master on 29 Nov 2011, 16:15 UTC reply to this comment

Yikes!!!


Comment #7 by: Derek on 29 Nov 2011, 17:06 UTC reply to this comment

Wild exaggeration of what was quoted.


Comment #8 by: suljo on 29 Nov 2011, 20:31 UTC reply to this comment

Intel 4 ever !


Comment #9 by: herpdareprerp on 29 Nov 2011, 20:39 UTC reply to this comment

how about you focus on stomping nvidia's * even harder and focus on the gpu market


Comment #10 by: mr. beta on 29 Nov 2011, 20:48 UTC reply to this comment

DEAR GOD NO! WHO ELSE IS THERE TO COMPETE THEN!?!? WHAT ABOUT THEIR GPU'S!? FFFUUUUU


Comment #11 by: pc guy on 29 Nov 2011, 22:54 UTC reply to this comment

$500 low end cpus anyone?????


Comment #12 by: cejir on 29 Nov 2011, 22:58 UTC reply to this comment

T_T nooooooooohhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!


Comment #13 by: abc on 29 Nov 2011, 23:32 UTC reply to this comment

Good time to own intel stock


Comment #14 by: Whattt? on 30 Nov 2011, 00:23 UTC reply to this comment

is this story real?


Comment #15 by: WTH? on 30 Nov 2011, 02:13 UTC reply to this comment

If it does happen that AMD doesn't make PC CPU's anymore means that Intel and do as they wish. Overpriced CPU's. Junk coming out each year and get away with it because they are the only ones.

Will ARM become mainstream in desktops and laptops?
Who else has rights to X86 and will be a Intel competitor?


Comment #16 by: ILLUMINATII on 30 Nov 2011, 03:20 UTC reply to this comment

IT'S ABOUT TIME, THE PEOPLE AT GAMETRAILERS WERE CIRCLE JERKING OVER AMD. NOW WHO'S RIGHT?


Comment #17 by: amax on 30 Nov 2011, 10:17 UTC reply to this comment

this is not a reliable source!


Comment #18 by: haha2 on 30 Nov 2011, 12:21 UTC reply to this comment

WTF!!


Comment #19 by: abd on 30 Nov 2011, 12:43 UTC reply to this comment

so disappoint with AMD...


Comment #20 by: QQmoar on 30 Nov 2011, 17:16 UTC reply to this comment

I have a 5 years old pc using amd and still alive.. comparing it to the last intel that I have. AMD rocks and its cheap! too bad its latest cpu's were buggy as * that I had to switch to sandy bridge - I wish they don't stop manufacturing cpus.


Comment #21 by: poom on 30 Nov 2011, 18:44 UTC reply to this comment

i think i like AMD pc equipment and i think its a bad decision


Comment #22 by: monkeymenace on 30 Nov 2011, 22:17 UTC reply to this comment

Such * ... I mean its on softpedia for gods sake! Hardly creditable journalism. Course they will continue in the PC market... a butcher doesn't just one day think... nah... I think I'm gonna stop with the meat and sell fruit instead..


Comment #23 by: AusNorman on 05 Dec 2011, 07:46 UTC reply to this comment

Cant say what has already been said b4.... but I love AMD and Intel, sad to see AMD go if this is true!


Comment #24 by: MC on 05 Dec 2011, 18:30 UTC reply to this comment

Bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD. Leave the desktop market to Intel, and we'll be back to paying $1,500 per chip. Then further development will stop (why develop anything new when you're the only game in town), then prices will rise AGAIN. AMD needs to stay in this market. I have no problems with Bulldozer or FM1. The real problem is the PR war that Intel wins with, for example, Best Buy ads that claim that "you need an Intel to do video editing". Intel gets caught, then they find another avenue to toss money into. It never ends.

If you're an Intel "fanboy" that constantly visits forums and sites with reviews just to jab at AMD, be careful what you wish for. An Intel monopoly is the LAST thing you want.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM