Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > CPU

May 31st, 2011, 20:01 GMT · By

AMD Bulldozer CPUs Too Slow to Compete with Core i7 Chips

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


AMD Zambezi 8-core processor die
Enlarge picture
AMD's recently announced delay of the first CPUs built on the high-performance Bulldozer architecture is due to the low clock speeds achieved by these chips, which makes them lag behind Intel's high-end Core i7 processors, according to sources familiar with the company's progress.

The processors are now fully-functional and work without any flaws, but they currently can't operate at high frequencies and cannot achieve the performance levels that AMD anticipated, stated one anonymous source cited by Xbit Labs.

In order to improve the performance of the chips, AMD needs to design a new stepping, that will be referred to as B2.

This will feature the same TDP as the current processors, but is expected to achieve higher clock speeds.

The new stepping should arrive in September, which means that AMD won't start shipping Bulldozer processor until the fourth quarter of 2011, or even early 2012.

Right now, the B0 and B1 revision CPUs built by AMD can function at about 2.5GHz (3.5GHz in Turbo mode) and thus they cannot deliver competitive performance.

The first reports regarding Bulldozer's delay appeared about a week ago, when it was uncovered that motherboard makers had to rely on Bulldozer engineering samples and on older Thuban processors in order to test their AM3+ products, as no retail samples were available from AMD.

These rumors have been confirmed yesterday by the AnandTech publication, which has stated that AMD's Zambezi FX chips will launch in July.

At this year's Computex, AMD was expected to launch four FX-series processors based on the Bulldozer architecture, two featuring eight processing cores while the other two packed six and respectively four CPU cores.

All four chips were targeting the high-end desktop space and were supposed to feature an unlocked multiplier, support for AMD's Turbo Core 2.0 technology and an integrated dual-channel DDR3-1866MHz controller.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

4,321 hits · 9 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


AMD Bulldozer Delay Confirmed, Launch Pushed Back to July

Recently Uncovered AMD Bulldozer Slide Reveals 4 New CPU Models

[UPDATE] AMD Bulldozer Retail Availability Postponed to Q3 2011 – Report

Intel to Debut Two New Sandy Bridge Pentium CPUs in 2H 2011

Leaked Intel Roadmap Confirms Ivy Bridge Q2 2012 Launch

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: ephud on 31 May 2011, 22:26 UTC reply to this comment

AMD's recently announced delay?

I can find no such recent announcement from AMD on my newsfeeds.


Comment #2 by: ephud on 01 Jun 2011, 00:47 UTC reply to this comment

AMD's recently announced delay ?

I haven't seen any announcement from AMD.


Comment #3 by: Kitsune on 01 Jun 2011, 01:36 UTC reply to this comment

sigh* delay once more... no ope for AMD for me... :(


Comment #4 by: Nate on 01 Jun 2011, 02:38 UTC reply to this comment

This sounds like a total disaster for AMD.


Comment #5 by: Ra on 01 Jun 2011, 06:41 UTC reply to this comment

Sad, but it'll worth the wait. AMD needs a competitive well tested processor to compete with i7.


Comment #6 by: Jpo on 01 Jun 2011, 12:28 UTC reply to this comment

* ! Another delay? AMD sucks, who will wait for them until September? And for what? It seems that their Bulldozers can have 100 cores and still are worse than Intel i7...

Too bad though, we do need competition.

Comment #6.1 by: colanusus on 01 Jun 2011, 13:47 GMT

Unfortunately this fight is definitely lost by AMD; to delay it for such long time and not to come at least with some samples…… to show everybody that it is at least possible to compete with Intel, and to ask 1-2 months until retail final specs availability; or even if they can not compete 100% to show lower prices; anyway to show something after all these delays; I waited for an alternative but I will go with Intel (either 2600k now or Sandy E or Ivy if I will decide to wait until autumn or next year); so sad that AMD can not deliver on their promises.


Comment #7 by: colanusus on 01 Jun 2011, 13:48 UTC reply to this comment

Unfortunately this fight is definitely lost by AMD; to delay it for such long time and not to come at least with some samples…… to show everybody that it is at least possible to compete with Intel, and to ask 1-2 months until retail final specs availability; or even if they can not compete 100% to show lower prices; anyway to show something after all these delays; I waited for an alternative but I will go with Intel (either 2600k now or Sandy E or Ivy if I will decide to wait until autumn or next year); so sad that AMD can not deliver on their promises.


Comment #8 by: TEXASCITIZEN on 01 Jun 2011, 21:19 UTC reply to this comment

AMD has been working on Bulldozer for 5-7 years and they don't know until a week before public release that it is too slow to beat Intel chips that have been selling to the public for 5-6 months?? That would not seem to speak too highly of either Bulldozer or AMD. If all that has to be done to get more speed is to step up the Ghz while keeping TDP the same & it only take a month or two, why doesn't Intel just improve SB that way? The unanswered bottom line is still, "Is Bulldozer going to be a DOG or not?" That is a question on which AMD does not seem to be willing or able shed any reliable light.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM