Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

January 16th, 2009, 14:04 GMT · By

95 Percent of Online Music Downloads Are Illegal

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Recording studios are at the heart of music production
Enlarge picture
According to new statistics from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), approximately 95 percent of all music downloads on the Internet are currently illegal, in that they infringe on copyright and cut the flow of cash to companies and artists. As a result, revenues have dropped globally by some 7 percent last year alone. Peer-to-peer (P2P) site representatives say that trying to hold on to obsolete copyright laws in the modern setup of the Internet proves that the companies have no real understanding of how the system works.

"There is a momentous debate going on about the environment on which our business, and all the people working in it, depends. Governments are beginning to accept that, in the debate over 'free content' and engaging ISPs [Internet Service Providers] in protecting intellectual property rights, doing nothing is not an option if there is to be a future for commercial digital content," says IFPI chairman and chief executive, John Kennedy.

According to the estimates of the organization, some 40 billion music files were illegally shared in 2008, while only 1.4 billion were downloaded legally. They say that the digital music business has expanded last year by more than 25 percent, reaching an estimated value of around $3.7 billion. Because people share music illegally and don't pay for the albums and tracks they own, they cause massive dents in profits for companies, labels, and music artists, the IFPI, which represents 1,400 companies in 72 countries, says.

However, those who operate large P2P sites say that placing something online makes it free for all, and that, in digital times, posted materials are shared. They say that the copyright laws are obsolete, and that trying to stop downloads online is impossible, even if the ISPs were to collaborate with companies in pursuing those guilty of copyright infringements. The debate is similar to that between people advocating open-source software, and those claiming patents for their creations.

"This is an age of rampant sharing and remixing, and if you can make the connection between sharing and culture as Doctorow has, you will see this war between rightsholders and consumers will never end and the rightsholders will never win. The band Girl Talk and Lessig and James Boyle and Terry McBride of Nettwerk and isoHunt all echo a common point: Remixing and sharing is good for culture, suing consumers and technologists who enable sharing is destructive for everyone," says the administrator for IH, a major P2P tracker site.

"The Internet is a more efficient information machine than the printing press or VCR ever was, and also a whole different animal. It's time the content industries learn to put it to better use as well, by discarding past notions of how business is done based on an economy of scarcity," he concludes.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

8,638 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Warner Music Divorces from YouTube

Yahoo! Announces 150 New Music Stations

MySpace Moves to Television Sets

Yahoo! Mail Inbox Gets Smarter

Google Adds Magazines to Its Book Library

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Chris on 17 Jan 2009, 20:14 UTC reply to this comment

What's a shame is that this whole battle seems to be missing the point. As somehow who openly and actively engages in "illegal" downloading, I can attest to the point of view that this isn't about anything more than worth. Because I live in a country whos' economy has been mostly made up by the kinds of people who are the most aggressive in protecting these copyright laws, I cannot afford to spend much, if any money on the arts. I have food, utilities, a car, and even those things have been minimized as much as they can go. If the very financially stable (relative to its' majority of consumers) is this concerned about making sure that someone like me pays money I cannot afford to listen to something that should not be restricted to anyone, then they are not focusing on reality. Treating us like common thiefs is not a way to open lines of communication to perhaps work out a compromise rather than one entity forcing its' views and values on another.

Comment #1.1 by: kl on 05 Nov 2010, 12:35 GMT

i agree with you there
if you walk into a shop and there is a donut going for 50 p u might buy it if u like it
if the shop next door has unlimited donuts for free well what are you going to do??
also some people might pay for some music but if there is several albums going for free they might as well get the lot something they wouldnt pay for anyway
so when they say they are losing out on this many sales its complete *

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM