Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Reviews > Compared Reviews

June 24th, 2006, 10:03 GMT · By Codrut Nistor

7-Zip vs IZArc

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The story of data compression starts back in the late 1940s and early 1950s with the publication of first papers on information and rate-distortion theories by Claude Shannon. In the meantime, the theory became practice and the data compression can be found everywhere, from mobile telephony to electronic devices in your kitchen.

I won't leave the computers behind today, don't worry! Size does matter, speed matters too, and above all these, if you could have a great archiver for free, that would be the best deal available...everybody knows that. The problem appears when you have to choose from a few hundreds of applications available for this purpose.

Today I picked two of the best free archivers available and I will try to discover their strong points, as well as the weak ones. As usual, my advice is to get them both, install and test them to see if they suit your needs.

First competitor is 7-Zip, the excellent archiver that comes with its own file compression format and can also be used as a file manager, and the other is IZArc, an archiving tool that supports a lot of file formats. Let's see what we have here...


7-Zip 4.42

While reviewing 7-Zip I was amazed by its set of features, ease of use, speed, but before everything, by the awesome compression rate achieved when using its own compression algorithm (it can even beat UHA, and it's much faster than that!).

7-Zip can be used to replace the Windows Explorer with success, its File Manager with a two panel interface and standard keyboard shortcuts being a great addition to this software.

Our problem today is archiving, so I will get to that. The only (small) issue with 7-Zip is that it can't handle ACE archives, but it makes up for that with lots of useful features, speed and compression ratio. For example, when you create an archive with password you can also encrypt file names in order to preserve complete confidentiality.

When talking about compression ratio, I will remind you the test I performed with this archiver. First I compressed the folder using Total Commander's ZIP compressor set to use maximum compression, and the archive that resulted was 134MB. 7-Zip got down to 99MB but could've done better if I had more than 1GB of memory installed on the test computer. UHA's best shot achieved 96.7MB, but can't get better than that.

7-Zip doesn't sacrifice too much speed when using the Ultra compression setting, compared to WinRar or UHA, but instead uses a lot of memory, so if you want to use it to obtain the smallest archives possible, then I suggest you to have 1.5-2GB of memory on your computer in order for it to run without problems (as you are probably used to by now when it comes to the requirements of a program, largest value is better...).

Needless to say that 7-Zip has full drag & drop support, can integrate perfectly with the Windows Shell and also has a very useful and powerful command line version. It is simply the best free archiver when we talk about compression settings and can fight WinRar or WinAce without any trouble on this field.

7-Zip is a program that can dig the graves for WinZip, WinRar or WinAce but that won't happen, of course...at least for now. I am not saying that it's much better than them, but it has
the best strong points for an archiver: high speed and best compression ratio...and the strongest point for any good software out there: it's free!

These being said, I am moving on to IZArc now, but I can't say I expect it to beat 7-Zip, it's just different. Let's see how different IZArc is!


See 7-Zip at work:

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image



IZArc 3.5 Beta3

I never used IZArc before, but my first encounter with it was a pleasant one. Its default interface reminds me of WinZip, especially the toolbar icons. It doesn't have the power of a great compression ratio like 7-Zip, but has the power that comes from its features and ease of use. For people who don't want complete control over all archiving parameters, this can be the right choice, considering the fact that it can handle even 7-Zip's archive file format, 7z.

So, what's special with IZArc?

First of all, it has an excellent file format support, being able to handle the most known archive types, including 7z and ACE and beating 7-Zip at this chapter.

Its interface has a fresh look and the toolbar icons can be changed as you wish. There are 15 available skins for the toolbar and you can create your own custom ones fairly easy.

A special feature of IZArc is that it can open and convert CD/DVD images like ISO, BIN, MDF, NRG and more.

IZArc can also integrate with the Windows Shell and fully supports drag & drop operations. Archives can be repaired, sent through email, converted or scanned for viruses using an external virus scanner.

The compression level can be set to Super Fast, Fast, Normal or Maximal but you can't set the dictionary size. The archiving method can also be selected manually.

Passwords can be added to archives, but file names from the archive can't be encrypted. A feature that may prove useful for many users is the UnSFX, a function that reverts self extracting archives to normal ones.

Wait, there's even more! IZArc can encrypt files using 256-bit encryption, create or merge multi-volume archive sets, decrypt IZE files...and the list goes on.

As I said, IZArc is not better or worse than 7-Zip, but just different. I can only advise you to get it, install it and draw your own conclusion, but until then, allow me to draw my conclusions.


Watch IZArc showing its goodies:

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image

Review image



Conclusions

This is another head to head test that doesn't have concludent results. Why?

I think that 7-Zip is the best archiver when talking about compression ratio and speed, and its File Manager is a great feature. Unfortunately, it doesn't support many archive formats, its interface is a bit outdated and can eat very large amounts of your system's memory when using the Ultra compression setting with highest dictionary sizes.

On the other hand, IZArc is an all-around performer: it can handle a lot of archive formats and even CD/DVD images, has a nice skinnable interface and a lot of other useful features. Its main drawback is that the compression settings are not as customizable as 7-Zip's ones and it can't be used as a file manager if needed.

Today we had two great archivers running for the crown, but I guess we should have two prizes today. 7-Zip has the power and speed, while IZArc has the looks and the features. Since they are both completely free, the choice is yours, but I think that best choice is to get them both and, of course, use each one as needed. Good luck!

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

47,624 hits · 7 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Amitt on 22 Feb 2009, 20:51 UTC reply to this comment

Well i used this two archivers...
I'll noticed thar IZArc is a bit slower... but i use it because the tons of formats it can handle.
I prefer 7zip. As you said speed and ratio...


Comment #2 by: TheManWithThePlan on 12 Mar 2009, 00:33 UTC reply to this comment

7-zip keeps getting better. It has drag and drop support and can deal with ISO files. I read that it can even open DMG (HFS) archives. I'm pretty sure those are those Mac OS .dmg files! 7-zip has multiple processor / thread / core support now too.

Personally, I find that 7-zip is superior, and for better looks and some (not all) interface stuff, I use PeaZip (which is a 7-zip front end). PeaZip is getting better too.

I still use 7-zip by itself at times, and I do like it's shell integration. PeaZip I use for SendTo commands, but I still like the ease of use of the 7-zip browser. I like that I can use 7-zip to browse EXE files to see if they have any compressed data to extract (open as archive). That sure beats running any and every random unknown installer and setup program! Nice to avoid the risk.

Personally, I find that 16 MB dictionary size is usually just fine on common computers, including some old ones with only 256 MB of RAM.

I vaguely remember some facts about ZIP files usually being limited in the number of files per folder or files per archive or archive size limit. I suspect that 7-zip doesn't have those limitations. Also, I'm under the impression that 7zip has more error-correction / validation options. PeaZip seems to have a lot of them too.

Hopefully more people will start using 7-zip. And on the Mac, 7zX is nice enough.


Comment #3 by: Jon on 29 Jul 2009, 19:41 UTC reply to this comment

Well, IZArc is not near as fast as 7zip, but I use both:
I use 7Zip for all formats that it can handle >But if it cannot open the archive I try opening it in IZArc too, as IZArc can open some archives that are claimed to be broken.
On the other hand, I use IZArc for all formats that 7Zip can't handle, and I use it for the features that 7Zip leaves out, but my favorite is not changed, 7Zip DOES keep getting better, as TheManWithThePlan, and soon it will hopefully be able to open all formats that IZArc can.
But to TheManWithThePlan, 7Zip already has THOUSANDS (Probably millions) of people using it, and I think it still beats IZArc's popularity.


Comment #4 by: lewis on 11 Sep 2009, 22:23 UTC reply to this comment

7Zip = Free + Open Source (LGPL) We can see the code, it will be free always

Izar = Free + Propietary We cannot see how it is done inside, it might stop being free someday as this soft is propietary

You are missing the most important point ,-)


Comment #5 by: Azo on 17 Feb 2010, 01:51 UTC reply to this comment

Dude, you gotta try 7-Zip 9.10 beta (22/12/2009) against IZArc 4.1 (04/12/2009).


Comment #6 by: supernerd on 06 Oct 2010, 13:22 UTC reply to this comment

I think for slower systems, izarc is a bit better cause it does not waste that much RAM.

Comment #6.1 by: Fusioncat on 18 Feb 2011, 08:26 GMT

Both are great software. Note that 7-zip can open archives with chinese file name.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM