Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Editorials

October 24th, 2009, 14:01 GMT · By

7 Things About Windows 7 You Shouldn’t Believe

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows 7
Enlarge picture
On October 22nd, 2009, Windows hit store shelves worldwide, and, unlike its predecessor, it was received with accolades. While stirring up user enthusiasm, Windows 7 also managed to generate a consistent number of headlines around the world. And, apparently, enthusiasm was contagious, while, at the same time, there were strong reactions to the latest Windows client release from Microsoft, and even whispers of criticism.

While surfing, I came across a variety of opinions on the new operating system designed to replace Windows Vista, some stronger than others, some blatantly incorrect and then others just uninformed or unwise. I selected a collection of Windows 7 musings that I think end users should be taking with a grain of salt, and then went ahead and added my own ruminations. I will not link to the sources of the opinions included below, as I am not attempting to generate a debate, nor to criticize. I simply want to put my two cents in and nothing more.

1. Windows 7 is perfect - no it is not. Proof of Windows 7’s imperfection comes from the growing number of Knowledge Base articles with updates and hotfixes that Microsoft has been constantly stacking up even before General Availability this week, but after the OS was complete, namely after the July 22nd release to manufacturing deadline.

But I will say this, Windows 7 has indeed been perfected. The evolutionary rather than revolutionary path from Vista to Windows 7 certainly falls within perfectibility as an ongoing process, in the sense that perfection is an unachievable goal. Don’t expect a perfect operating system, but do expect less clutter, more clarity, a boost in performance, compatibility, stability, increased reliability, less RAM and hardware resource hunger, more battery time and less energy consumption, enhanced usability and personalization capabilities. By all means, expect a platform that will just work from Windows 7, but always leave a little room for that exception confirming the rule.

2. Windows 7 is just Vista with a new UI - this is at the opposite pole from “Windows 7 is perfect.” It is true that, where some see perfection, others see almost no added value at all. Yes, Vista was that much of a geek-heartbreak for quite a few, especially those still suffering from Longhorn melancholia. But Windows 6.1 brings more to the table than an overhauled UI.

There’s native multi-touch support, DirectX 11, BitLocker To Go, DirectAccess, BranchCache, Play To, Remote Media Streaming, HomeGroup, Internet Explorer 8, Libraries, Windows XP Mode, etc. Still, users must understand that Windows 7 is not a strong Windows client release measured in the quantity of new features introduced, but rather in the quality and cohesiveness of the entire operating system.

And only on top of the new features and the perfected OS sitting on the overhauled MinWin core does the shell come into play, with a revamped Windows Explorer, but also with UI advances as Aero Peek, Aero Snap, Jump Lists, and the whole Windows Taskbar, for that matter. So, just Vista with a new UI? I don’t think so. Not even at a superficial look.

3. Microsoft’s reputation rests on Windows 7 being a success - not actually true. It would be true if Microsoft was one trick pony, and if that pony were Windows, but this is no longer the case. The Redmond company started long ago to diversify its business to the point where, if Windows, for example, were to fail, and I mean fail completely, with the whole Windows Division being shut down, the company would be able to carry on.

And Microsoft’s reputation, while being intimately connected with Windows, would survive a Windows disaster, and would recover any damage suffered. Looking at Microsoft, the company has at its foundation a variety of pillars including Windows Live Division, Server and Tools, Online Services Division, Microsoft Business Division, and the Entertainment and Devices Division.

While Windows 7 will be a success, I have no doubts about this, as I have been running the OS as my main platform for the most of 2009, a potential failure would only create a dent in the company’s reputation, but certainly nothing that can’t be fixed with “a marketing patch.”

4. There’s no direct upgrade from Windows XP to Windows 7
- what Microsoft has said is that it does not support direct, in-place upgrades from XP to Windows 7. As far as I’m concerned, the hardware and software compatibility gap between the two platforms plus end users upgrading blindly with zero preparation is a dangerous combination. Microsoft did well by dodging a potential Wild West of XP to Windows 7 upgrades that would have only been detrimental to Vista’s successor.

Still, provided that you know where to look and how to access and leverage the resources Microsoft has made available, XP to Windows 7 upgrades could not be simpler. The best tool to get the job done, although upgrades are just one of the scenarios supported, is the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit 2010. While participating in a Windows 7 presentation from Microsoft earlier this year, I witnessed what MDT 2010 could do when it came to XP to Windows 7 upgrades. But trust me on this one, while it might not be for the average user, hardlink migration is the way to go when jumping from XP to Windows 7.

5. Wait before Windows 7 SP1 before you upgrade - this is not actually from the web, but rather a strongly rooted conception, especially with enterprise customers. Enterprises are notoriously sluggish when it comes to migrating their IT infrastructure to a new Windows release, a tactic designed to help them avoid the incompatibility issues associated with a not-yet-mature RTM operating system.

It is precisely these customers that should think of Windows 7 as having its first RTM at the start of 2007, when Vista was launched. Vista was the transition operating system that took in all the heavy fire for software and hardware compatibility problems, and allowed SP1 and by SP1 developers and manufacturers to tailor their products to the new OS. And Windows 7 just rips all the benefits, being ready for prime time as it’s just out of the gate.

6. Windows 7 is slower than Vista - Yes, I’m throwing this into the “shouldn’t believe” pile as well. I know that Windows 7 is faster than Vista because I used Vista for over two years, and Windows 7 since Beta Build 7000. The two platforms have been running in parallel on my machines, and even on the same computer. Windows 7 simply delivers more performance than Vista did when it was released in January 2007, because I’m comparing the two operating systems at RTM-level and not after the service packs were added to XP’s successor, vastly improving all aspects of the OS, including performance. And it’s not just about speed, from startup to shutdown and sleep, from task and hardware resource management to increased battery life and lower power consumption, Windows 7 is simply better.

7. Linux and Mac OS X are better options over Windows - I don’t expect members of the open source community or Apple fanboys to convert to Windows 7, and I do support choice, this is why I’m not going to give a verdict in the perpetual Linux vs. OS X vs. Windows operating system measuring contest. I will say that there are scenarios in which I run Linux, such as for web servers, where the open source OS is always my first choice. For an average user that wants to upgrade to a new platform that simply works or buy a new machine, I will recommend Windows 7 in a heartbeat, and would hesitate to point them to other platforms. For enthusiasts and geeks, people that build their own computers, Windows 7 is also the best choice, go with the Ultimate SKU for that matter. Gamers that want to take advantage of the new DirectX 11 games and hardware will undoubtedly also choose Windows 7. And, once Apple introduces Windows 7 support in Boot Camp so that users can run the latest iteration of the Windows client, I will have no problems recommending Mac machines.

8. Windows 7 is the best Windows ever - actually, believe this. I only said seven things about Windows 7 you shouldn’t believe. This is number eight. By all means, start believing.

The Microsoft Deployment Toolkit 2010 5.0 is available for download here.

Microsoft Windows 7 90-Day Eval VHD is available for download here.

Another Windows 7 RTM Enterprise 90-Day Evaluation is available for download here.

Windows 7 RTM Starter Edition, 100-Screenshot Gallery

Windows 7 RTM Home Basic 110-Screenshot Gallery

Windows 7 RTM Home Premium 120-Screenshot Gallery

Windows 7 RTM Professional 110-Screenshot Gallery

Windows 7 RTM Enterprise 100-Screenshot Gallery

FILED UNDER:
Windows 7
RTM
Microsoft

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

31,204 hits · 12 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Windows 7 Gets Thumbs-Up from Linux Creator

Microsoft Reports $12.92 Billion Revenue for First Quarter

Windows Server 2008 R2 Needs Windows 7 to Shine

Windows 7 RTM Compatibility Center Now Live

Watch the Windows 7 Launch in New York

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Best on 24 Oct 2009, 13:52 UTC reply to this comment

I kind of just love how you advertise your ===== but remember that grown ups aren't kids. All the same it was nice meeting you on this site. I wish as well to know if you can help me out with this little prob. I use Pentium III and I believe it can't operate with Windows 7 and Vista as well as some other advanced versions of Microsoft Operating Softwares. If there is any truth in this please do me a favor and send some few answers to my email add below disguisegh4u@yahoo.com and I'll appreciate it most. Also pls make it clear for me on some kind of advanced progs of microsoft that I can use as far as mu Pentium III is concerned. Thanks a lot for having time to read my msg. See ya. Bye.............................


Comment #2 by: Trent on 24 Oct 2009, 15:21 UTC reply to this comment

"For enthusiasts and geeks, people that build their own computers, Windows 7 is also the best choice, go with the Ultimate SKU for that matter."

Windows 7 Ultimate at Amazon is $320. That's almost the cost of the hardware for a new computer. I could put FIVE Linux distros on each of TWO new computers for the cost of ONE Wiindows 7 machine. People who build their own computers do NOT get the volume discounts that Microsoft affords to OEMs.

As an aside, I've had a great deal of hardware trouble with Windows 7 on home-built computers. I have not been able to get sound on a number of new motherboards with the Win 7 RC, and it seems to have trouble with a lot of usb hub cards. I cannot explain why, but I have yet to have any driver problems whatsoever on the same hardware with Ubuntu or Fedora. Microsoft seems still to be having a number of driver issues with Vista/Win 7.

Windows 7 is a great choice for people who buy their computers off the shelf, with all the hardware and drivers pre-configured. But it is, IMHO, an expensive and incompatible choice for people who like to build their own computers.

Comment #2.1 by: Kenn on 16 Nov 2009, 19:42 GMT

I dont know how you build your pc's, but as an IT guy and avid gamer I just put togther a box using a new asus board, i7 core pentium, sli'd two asus nvidia cards together and dropped 8 gigs of ram on it (not to mention pcpac power supply and flashy light gizmos) and 7 preformed flawlessly for all equuipment.

I adopted 7 on the beta release in january and havent looked back. I will admit, as a microsoft partner I got a copy of windows 7 enterprise to test on my home box, so that cost wasnt included in the final build. But for gamers like me who spend over 2500 on a computer every 2-3 years, windows 7 preforms perfectly.


Comment #3 by: Gaurav on 24 Oct 2009, 15:43 UTC reply to this comment

Correct. Windows 7 is awesome. Using it from past few months and its amazingly impressive. Fast, Sleak, ... Windows 7 rocks


Comment #4 by: anonymous on 24 Oct 2009, 15:59 UTC reply to this comment

this review comes across like a fanboy article. you need to highlight more weaknesses when reviewing, providing the whole picture, instead of tossing in the occaisional comment highlighting a mildly undesireable quirk to reinforce the positive aspects you've already covered. i doubt any new operating system has so few faults, and while windows 7 may represent a step in the right direction, your article only serves to make me skeptical, rather than a convert. you sound like you've been paid off or something.


Comment #5 by: on 24 Oct 2009, 17:10 UTC reply to this comment

This is the best OS MS ever built!!!


Comment #6 by: Dalmo on 25 Oct 2009, 01:55 UTC reply to this comment

Awakening article in a way or other with many good points.

I can't second all the author's points for I am not an expert but think the author is on target with many of them. One for sure, Windows7 seems to getting better than Mac OS X but can't compare with LINUX right now .

I have one MAC and so have my friends, but I definitely going to shift to LINUX even if it is worse than Wiindows.

It's not that I am turning away from Windows7 it's I am turning away from Microsoft.
I think open source is the future and it's hard for me to tolerate a software giant's hegemony and being naked to their monopoly. But it stands to other software too, such as ADOBE, etc.

And there are always alternatives. That is my point.


Comment #7 by: Rahul on 25 Oct 2009, 05:38 UTC reply to this comment

Well this post is nice, and I believe that Windows 7 is going to be the best ever Operating System.
Open source is good only for purposes like "The Web Server", but for home general use, the windows environment is best

Comment #7.1 by: Tropcon. on 09 Aug 2011, 01:56 GMT

I couldn't help but smile when I read this comment. I stopped using Windows about five years ago, in favor of Ubuntu Linux. I've also gotten about 7 of my friends hooked on it (over half of them almost totally computer illiterate.) In the time since I made the switch, I have learned far more about how to effectively use and customize my Linux operating system than I ever learned about using Windows.
I don't want to go on a tirade, but I love seeing my Pentium 4 Linux machines running faster than Windows 7 on a Core 2.
I have nothing against people using Windows. The point of a computer is to be useful and easy to work with. If windows fulfills these requirements for you, than by all means use it (if you're prepared to deal with viruses.)
Point being, I think the statement in previous post is wrong. I am a total Open Source fan, and there's no going back.


Comment #8 by: tester on 25 Oct 2009, 13:56 UTC reply to this comment

Well, I have to addmit that windows 7 works as good as was windows3.1, in the good way. It is really fast, until now quite stable; it recognise allmost without problems all new hardware. Even thoug i´m a linux user I will recommand windows (7) for the first time in my life.


Comment #9 by: Sahan Lakshitha on 26 Oct 2009, 06:17 UTC reply to this comment

Yep, it's all true. Vista sucked in the beginning but after the release of service packs vista survived. So it's better to keep still windows 7 sp1 comes. Windows 7 has all the features like GOOD PERFORMANCE, HIGH SPEED only within 1st week (My experience), after the first week it's remind me the vista's old days.

Anyway my PC with vista sp1 serving be better,

Have to mention, some people get most out of windows 7 other than any other versions of windows, might be a hardware compatibly huh ?


Comment #10 by: tux on 02 Nov 2009, 12:58 UTC reply to this comment

"would hesitate to point them to other platforms." What would be problem with the other platforms? Well, there are no problems, it's just hes opinion.

But what else can you expect from a reporter who writes articles only about Windows, Bing, Visual Studio, .Net and so on.

He knows Windows 7 is the best OS(from MS OS it is) but he never had a look at a Mac or Linux. He is a reporter and if he would have spend 2 hours with a Mac or Linux he would have had an article about it, but he doesn't have one.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM