Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets

April 24th, 2012, 09:20 GMT · By

28 nm SOI Manufacturing Tech Is Here to Stay, Soon Will Show 50% to 550% Improvements

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Comparison between Intel's Tri-gate transistors and FD-SOI
Enlarge picture
French company Soitec is a manufacturer and developer of Silicon On Insulator wafers that is headquartered in Bernin, France.

SOI technology is well known to the computer enthusiasts all over the world, as this is the technology AMD used to manufacture its CPUs since the 2003 K8 architecture. The initiator of SOI was in fact IBM, and they’ve had a close collaboration with AMD on SOI.

The difference between the SOI 28nm wafers and the bulk 28 nm manufacturing process is the fact that SOI offers less leakage current, less power consumption and, consequently, less heat dissipation.

It may be a little more expensive, but when you want your CPUs to work at 4 GHz instead of 2 GHz, you’ll probably look at anything but the bulk 28 nm manufacturing process.

A clear proof of what SOI can do for chip manufacturing is the fact that, because of the higher quality of the 28 nm manufacturing process at GlobalFoundries (GF) that uses SOI,  AMD and Qualcomm gave up on TSMC and went to GF for manufacturing their new designs in 28 nm.

The current SOI process used by AMD is actually called PD SOI. That’s short for Partially Depleted SOI.

Comparison between Intel's Tri-gate transistors and FD-SOI
Enlarge picture
The difference is the fact that FD-SOI has an ultra-thin Buried Oxide over the base silicon, while PD-SOI actually is thicker having a “Body” over the Buried Oxide.

It doesn’t really matter how it looks, but Soitec’s compatriot, STMicro says that from their own study of the FD-SOI technology, the advantage FD-SOI has over their own 28 nm bulk process is 61 percent higher at 1V (volt) and gets even more interesting at lower VDD (Voltage Drain Drain), showing a 550 percent improvement at 0.6V.

Intel’s Tri-gate 3D transistor concept is based on PhD Chenming Calvin Hu’s ideas. Dr. Hu is TSMC distinguished professor of microelectronics at the University of California, Berkeley, but between 2001 and 2004, he was the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of TSMC.

Comparison between Intel's Tri-gate transistors and FD-SOI
Enlarge picture
Soitec’s FD-SOI is the French company’s answer to Intel’s finFETs.

Sure Intel has huge FABs and lots of R&D money but Soitec’s customers are, among others, AMD, Freescale Semiconductor, Mitsubishi Electric, OKI, IBM Microelectronics, Philips Semiconductors, Sony and Toshiba.

Therefore, when all these companies are going SOI, and some of them are already using Soitec’s FD-SOI wafers, like STMicro and IBM, you’ll wonder if Intel’s 14nm process isn’t too far away for the American/Israeli company to be competitive.
FILED UNDER:
SOI
FD SOI
soitec
ibm
amd


3,809 hits · 8 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


ATIC and State of Saxony to Jointly Research 3D Chip Packaging

Qualcomm Moves Production to GlobalFoundries

Nvidia Looking for a Source of 450mm Wafers

AMD Racing Against Google to Buy MIPS

AMD Ready to Launch New Opteron Processor Models

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: hello on 25 Apr 2012, 00:32 UTC reply to this comment

I think that this article is complete nonsense and I don't understand how Soitec allows this kind of stuff on their site . Has anybody from Soitec read it ? I very much doubt about it .

Comment #1.1 by: mazda on 27 Apr 2012, 03:17 GMT

you're right this article is full of wrong statements . As an example take this one :
"A clear proof of what SOI can do for chip manufacturing is the fact that, because of the higher quality of the 28 nm manufacturing process at GlobalFoundries (GF) that uses SOI, AMD and Qualcomm gave up on TSMC and went to GF for manufacturing their new designs in 28 nm."
and compare with this declaration of a manager from Qualcomm :
"Although the manufacturing yields are progressing per expectation, there's a shortage of 28-nanometer capacity," Jacobs said. He added that Qualcomm could not secure enough 28-nm capacity to meet the increasing demand for its 28-nm parts and that the constraints to supply are expected to limit Qualcomm's revenue potential this year.

Jacobs acknowledged that Qualcomm was engaging with "several alternative sources" for 28-nm capacity. Jacobs did not identify the alternative sources, but possibilities would presumably include Globalfoundries Inc., United Microelectronics Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Jacobs said Qualcomm would increase its operating expenses to facilitate additional 28-nm supply.

Jacobs said Qualcomm would also continue to use TSMC as a foundry for 28-nm devices...."

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4371286/Qualcomm-engages-other-foundries -amid-28-nm-capacity-shortage

Comment #1.2 by: Constantin Murariu on 27 Apr 2012, 10:05 GMT

UMC is not in full 28 nm production and only samples products. Their 28 nm is not as refined as TSMC's or GlobalFoundires'. Qualcomm is searching for more production capacity and only GlobalFoundires has any to spare. Samsung's entire capacity is busy churning out its own chips and the chips to satisfy Apple's need for volume. So UMC doesn't have the capacity nor the refined tech nor do they have full production. Samsung is busy doing something else. The only guys left are ATIC with their foundry.

Comment #1.3 by: mazda on 27 Apr 2012, 18:31 GMT

i'll be a bit more precise to show what the differences are :
1) AMD is still withe TSMC and is quite happy of their collaboration :

" AMD: We See No Problems with 28nm Chip Supply.

AMD Claims Its Shipments of 28nm GPUs in Q1 Met Supply
[04/19/2012 03:23 PM]
by Anton Shilov " at http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/graphics/display/20120419152303_AMD_We_See_No_Problems_with_28nm_Supply.html

2) Qualcomm did not leave TSMC they remain their client ( see text above )
3) Qualcomm dis not say they are going to GF , it's just one of the foundries they are looking at
4) If they choose GF it's not because of better quality ( attached to the fact that GF is manufactuting SOI ??? ) , it's just because they can't get enough production from TSMC

I'm sorry , but there is obvious differences between the text ant the reality .

And what is the meaning of " It doesn’t really matter how it looks, but Soitec’s compatriot, STMicro says that from their own study of the FD-SOI technology, the advantage FD-SOI has over their own 28 nm bulk process is 61 percent higher at 1V .." . And what advantage are they talking about ? And what about the astonishing +550% ? It's quite amazing , no ?


Comment #2 by: Constantin Murariu on 29 Apr 2012, 18:32 UTC reply to this comment

Qualcomm's CEO will never directly say where they are going to buy more production capacity. They are looking for a good process at a foundry with capacity to spare. It's an analyst's job to deduce what's their next move and offer an opinion. You're arguing he never said it directly. I know he didn't. It would be strange for him to say it while they're still negotiating and probably are in talks with different foundries. We believe GlobalFoundries will be their main choice. AMD still uses TSMC for GPUs and some of the Brazos APUs but you're quoting the wrong article. To give you an example I'll direct you towards two other of Anton's articles:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120419172156_AMD_Begins_Volume_Manufacturing_of_A_Series_Trinity_APUs.html :

"According to unofficial information, Globalfoundries, AMD's production partner, began volume manufacturing of Trinity in mid-March, 2012."

and

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120419194944_AMD_Expects_to_Start_Small_Volume_Production_of_28nm_APUs_Late_This_Year.html:

"All three Fusion accelerated processing units are set to be made using 28nm process technology, but AMD does not disclose which chips will be made by Globalfoundries and which by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. It is possible that some APUs will come from both foundries to ensure maximum volumes."

That is because AMD is actually departing from TSMC's 28 nm process and going for Globalfoundries’ better technology. Also, Globalfoundries is manufacturing Trinity APUs right now while TSMC only has Brazos 2.0 to build and Llano APUs. As for the 550% improvements, there will be a follow-up article with more details later this week, but, if you're so interested in the semiconductor field, you can search for STMicro's research yourself. My contact at STMicro told me that the info is publicly available in STMicro's whitepapers.

Comment #2.1 by: murariu fan on 01 May 2012, 12:45 GMT

Please, have you read this before writing or not ?

http://www.hard
ware.fr/news/12180/soi-28nm-amd.html

Publié le 09/03/2012 à 11:11 par Marc Prieur (26) Réactions Share on facebookShare on google_plusoneElectronicsWeekly rapporte des propos de Thomas Seifert, directeur financier d'AMD, indiquant que tous les produits d'AMD en 28nm utiliseront un process de type bulk. Il indique que les avantages liés au bulk en termes de flexibilité au niveau des fondeurs (seuls GloFo et IBM utilisant le SOI, et pas TSMC, et AMD a annoncé avoir levé l'exclusivité qu'il avait avec GloFo pour les APU 28nm) et d'outil de design sont plus importants que l'augmentation de performance du transistor lié au SOI (cf. cette actualité).
...
Pour le moment AMD prévoit de lancer 3 APU en 28nm en 2013 : Kaveri, sur le segment des A-Series actuellement occupé par Llano (en 32nm SOI) et Vishera (en 32nm SOI également), mais aussi Kabini et Tamesh, des évolutions des Bobcat 40nm. On ne sait encore rien sur d'éventuels processeurs Desktop ou serveurs basés sur l'architecture Steamroller, mais si ils sont en 28nm ils ne seront donc pas en SOI. Reste à savoir si il s'agit d'un abandon définitif de cette technologie ou si AMD et Global Foundries y reviendront pour des gravures de taille inférieure.


Comment #3 by: anonymus on 01 May 2012, 15:05 UTC reply to this comment

Basically mazda is upset because the author of the article offered a well documented opinion and that Qualcomm's CEO did not bluntly disclosed the company's plans :)

Good article with good insight!

@mazda : do some more research dude, even I was able to get STMicro's research whitepaper. Try Google? :)

Comment #3.1 by: mazda on 04 Jul 2012, 04:52 GMT

"a welle documented opinion" : LOL

"
Qualcomm signs UMC, Samsung for 28-nm chips, says report
Peter Clarke
7/3/2012 5:22 AM EDT

LONDON – Mobile processor supplier Qualcomm Inc. has signed up foundry United Microelectronics Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. as suppliers of 28-nm chips, according to a Taiwan Economic News report.

The move will help Qualcomm (San Diego, Calif.) cope with tight supply situation at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Hsinchu, Taiwan), Qualcomm's main foundry.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM